Glycaemic control mediates the relationships of employment status and self‐stigma with self‐care behaviours in young adults with type 2 diabetes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
May‐Hung Lin ◽  
Horng‐Yih Ou ◽  
Ruey‐Hsia Wang ◽  
Ching‐Han Lin ◽  
Hsiu‐Yun Liao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Glycaemic Control ◽  
Employment Status ◽  
Self Care

scholarly journals Glycaemic Control and Practice of Self-Care Behaviors among People with Type 2 Diabetes in Nigeria

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nnena Osuji ◽  
Oluwaseun Ojo ◽  
Sunday Malomo ◽  
Adegbola Ige ◽  
Ademola Egunjobi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycaemic Control ◽  
Self Care

Adherence to medication, glycaemic control and hospital attendance in young adults with type 2 diabetes

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 728-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shalini Kunasegaran ◽  
Junaid Beig ◽  
Manish Khanolkar ◽  
Tim Cundy
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Glycaemic Control ◽  
Adherence To Medication

scholarly journals Relationships of diabetes self‐care behaviours to glycaemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes and comorbid heart failure

Nursing Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 1453-1467
Author(s):  
Fekadu Aga ◽  
Sandra B. Dunbar ◽  
Tedla Kebede ◽  
Melinda Kay Higgins ◽  
Rebecca Gary
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycaemic Control ◽  
Self Care

scholarly journals Pathways between food insecurity and glycaemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (17) ◽  
pp. 3237-3244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebekah J Walker ◽  
Joni Strom Williams ◽  
Leonard E Egede
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycaemic Control ◽  
Food Insecurity ◽  
Direct Effect ◽  
Perceived Stress ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Self Care ◽  
Indirect Pathway

AbstractObjectiveFood insecurity is reported in approximately 28 % of individuals with diabetes in the USA and is associated with poor glycaemic and lipid control. The present study aimed to understand the direct and indirect pathways through which food insecurity impacts glycaemic control in individuals with diabetes.Design/Setting/SubjectsAdults (n 615) with type 2 diabetes completed validated questionnaires after recruitment from two primary care clinics. Structural equation modelling was used to investigate mechanisms through which food insecurity influences diabetes self-care behaviours and glycaemic control, including investigation into possible direct and indirect effects of perceived stress and social support.ResultsThe final model showed that higher food insecurity was directly significantly related to increased stress (r=0·14, P<0·001) and increased glycosylated Hb (r=0·66, P=0·03). Higher stress was significantly related to poorer self-care (r=−0·54, P<0·001) and lower social support (r=−0·41, P<0·001). There was no significant direct association between food insecurity and self-care, or between perceived stress and glycaemic control.ConclusionsFood insecurity had both a direct effect on glycaemic control and an indirect effect on self-care through stress. The indirect pathway suggests that efforts to address stress may influence the ability of individuals to perform diabetes self-care behaviours. The direct effect on glycaemic control suggests that pathways independent of self-care behaviours may also be necessary to improve diabetes outcomes. Results from the study suggest a multipronged approach is necessary to address food insecurity in individuals with diabetes.

scholarly journals Diabetes Self-Care Activities and Glycaemic Control among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes in Sri Lanka: A Cross-Sectional Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (05) ◽  
pp. 99-111
Author(s):  
Meerigama Arachchige Rasoda Saumika ◽  
Thamara Dilhani Amarasekara ◽  
Rasika Jayasekara
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Sri Lanka ◽  
Glycaemic Control ◽  
Self Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional

scholarly journals Extent and Predictors of Poor Glycaemic Control among Elderly Pakistani Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Multi-Centre Cross-Sectional Study

Medicina ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Muhammad Atif ◽  
Quratulain Saleem ◽  
Saima Asghar ◽  
Iram Malik ◽  
Nafees Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycaemic Control ◽  
Self Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Poor Glycaemic Control

Objectives: This study aimed to explore the relationship between glycaemic control and factors that may influence this among elderly type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in Lahore, Pakistan. Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted at the Jinnah and Sir Ganga Ram Hospitals, Lahore using convenience sampling techniques between 1 December 2015 and 28 February 2016. The sample consisted of elderly (>65 years) T2DM patients. Glycaemic values and patient characteristics were obtained from medical charts. Consenting patients were interviewed to complete the Barthel Index, Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, Clinical Frailty Scale, Iowa Pain Thermometer Scale, Geriatric Depression Scale, Montreal Cognitive Assessment tool, Mini Nutritional Assessment Scale—Short Form and Self Care Inventory—Revised Version. Multiple logistic regression analysis was carried out to determine the predictors of poor glycaemic control. Results: A total of 490 patients were approached and 400 agreed to participate. Overall, nearly one-third (32.2%, n = 129) of patients had glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) at the target level. Fasting and random plasma glucose levels were within the target range to much the same extent; (36.8%, n = 147) and (27%, n = 108), respectively. HbA1c levels were also higher in patients with co-morbidities (67.4%, n = 229) with diabetes-related complications (73.5%, n = 227). Significant predictors of impaired glycaemic control (HbA1c) included poor diabetes self-care (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95, 0.98), not being prescribed oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHA) (AOR 6.22; 95% CI 2.09, 18.46), regular hypoglycaemic attacks (AOR 2.53; 95% CI 1.34, 4.81) and falling tendency (AOR 0.19; 95% CI 0.10, 0.36). Conclusions: Poor glycaemic control prevailed among the majority of elderly Pakistani diabetic patients in this study. Triggering factors of poor glycaemic control should be taken into consideration by the healthcare professionals in targeting multifaceted interventions to achieve good glycaemic control.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document