scholarly journals Relationships of diabetes self‐care behaviours to glycaemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes and comorbid heart failure

Nursing Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 1453-1467
Author(s):  
Fekadu Aga ◽  
Sandra B. Dunbar ◽  
Tedla Kebede ◽  
Melinda Kay Higgins ◽  
Rebecca Gary
Author(s):  
Nnena Osuji ◽  
Oluwaseun Ojo ◽  
Sunday Malomo ◽  
Adegbola Ige ◽  
Ademola Egunjobi ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (10) ◽  
pp. A886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chim C. Lang ◽  
Daniel Levin ◽  
Mohapradeep Mohan ◽  
Helen Parry ◽  
Douglas Elder ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fekadu Aga ◽  
Sandra B Dunbar ◽  
Tedla Kebede ◽  
Melinda K Higgins ◽  
Rebecca A Gary

Introduction: Multi-morbidity is increasingly recognized to negatively influence self-care behaviors such as dietary adherence in persons living with serious or life-threatening chronic conditions such as type 2 diabetes (T2D) and heart failure (HF). Aim: The aim of this study was to describe demographic, clinical, and psychosocialcorrelates of dietary self-care behaviors in adult patients with T2D and comorbid HF. Methods: The parent study for this secondary analysis was a randomized trial that tested a 6-month integrated self-care intervention for 180 participants with comorbid HF and T2D. Cross-sectional, baseline data was used for the predictive model which included demographic (age, sex, marital status, and education) psychosocial (depression [PhQ-9], self-efficacy [PDSMS], and diabetes knowledge [MDKT]); and clinical variables (years diagnosed with T2D and HF, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and implanted cardiac device). The general and specific diet components of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) were used to measure dietary self-care behaviors. Correlational bivariate and stepwise linear regression analyses were performed to examine correlates of dietary self-care behaviors. Results: Participants mean age was 58 ±11 years and the majority were male (n = 118, 66%) and African American (n = 119, 66%). Charlson comorbidity >2 ( p <0.05) and implanted device ( p <0.05) predicted lower SDSCA general diet score. Diabetes self-efficacy ( p <0.01) predicted higher SDSCA specific diet score while implanted cardiac device ( p <0.05) predicted lower score, collectively explaining 18.2% of the variance in diabetes-specific dietary self-care behavior. Conclusion: Findings suggest that multimorbidity may increase risk for lower diabetes dietary self-care behaviors, particularly those with more advanced HF requiring an implanted device. Future research should focus on how to promote effective self-care behaviors in persons living with multimorbidity as a strategy to improve clinical outcomes and enhance quality of life.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (17) ◽  
pp. 3237-3244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebekah J Walker ◽  
Joni Strom Williams ◽  
Leonard E Egede

AbstractObjectiveFood insecurity is reported in approximately 28 % of individuals with diabetes in the USA and is associated with poor glycaemic and lipid control. The present study aimed to understand the direct and indirect pathways through which food insecurity impacts glycaemic control in individuals with diabetes.Design/Setting/SubjectsAdults (n 615) with type 2 diabetes completed validated questionnaires after recruitment from two primary care clinics. Structural equation modelling was used to investigate mechanisms through which food insecurity influences diabetes self-care behaviours and glycaemic control, including investigation into possible direct and indirect effects of perceived stress and social support.ResultsThe final model showed that higher food insecurity was directly significantly related to increased stress (r=0·14, P<0·001) and increased glycosylated Hb (r=0·66, P=0·03). Higher stress was significantly related to poorer self-care (r=−0·54, P<0·001) and lower social support (r=−0·41, P<0·001). There was no significant direct association between food insecurity and self-care, or between perceived stress and glycaemic control.ConclusionsFood insecurity had both a direct effect on glycaemic control and an indirect effect on self-care through stress. The indirect pathway suggests that efforts to address stress may influence the ability of individuals to perform diabetes self-care behaviours. The direct effect on glycaemic control suggests that pathways independent of self-care behaviours may also be necessary to improve diabetes outcomes. Results from the study suggest a multipronged approach is necessary to address food insecurity in individuals with diabetes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 399-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eberhard Standl

Heart failure (HF) is one of the most common comorbidities of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and poor glycaemic control can worsen the HF outcomes and increase the risk of hospitalisations. With the entry of several antihyperglycaemic agents for the management of T2DM over the last decade, there has been an increasing concern regarding the cardiovascular (CV) safety profile of these agents. In view of this, FDA mandated the demonstration of cardiovascular risk-benefit profile of these agents through specifically designed CV outcome trials. Although we have several findings from these trials, none of them included HF as a primary endpoint indicating the need of trials focusing on HF. Here, we briefly discuss the results of the CV outcome trials in the context of HF.


2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (05) ◽  
pp. 99-111
Author(s):  
Meerigama Arachchige Rasoda Saumika ◽  
Thamara Dilhani Amarasekara ◽  
Rasika Jayasekara

Medicina ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Muhammad Atif ◽  
Quratulain Saleem ◽  
Saima Asghar ◽  
Iram Malik ◽  
Nafees Ahmad

Objectives: This study aimed to explore the relationship between glycaemic control and factors that may influence this among elderly type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in Lahore, Pakistan. Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted at the Jinnah and Sir Ganga Ram Hospitals, Lahore using convenience sampling techniques between 1 December 2015 and 28 February 2016. The sample consisted of elderly (>65 years) T2DM patients. Glycaemic values and patient characteristics were obtained from medical charts. Consenting patients were interviewed to complete the Barthel Index, Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, Clinical Frailty Scale, Iowa Pain Thermometer Scale, Geriatric Depression Scale, Montreal Cognitive Assessment tool, Mini Nutritional Assessment Scale—Short Form and Self Care Inventory—Revised Version. Multiple logistic regression analysis was carried out to determine the predictors of poor glycaemic control. Results: A total of 490 patients were approached and 400 agreed to participate. Overall, nearly one-third (32.2%, n = 129) of patients had glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) at the target level. Fasting and random plasma glucose levels were within the target range to much the same extent; (36.8%, n = 147) and (27%, n = 108), respectively. HbA1c levels were also higher in patients with co-morbidities (67.4%, n = 229) with diabetes-related complications (73.5%, n = 227). Significant predictors of impaired glycaemic control (HbA1c) included poor diabetes self-care (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95, 0.98), not being prescribed oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHA) (AOR 6.22; 95% CI 2.09, 18.46), regular hypoglycaemic attacks (AOR 2.53; 95% CI 1.34, 4.81) and falling tendency (AOR 0.19; 95% CI 0.10, 0.36). Conclusions: Poor glycaemic control prevailed among the majority of elderly Pakistani diabetic patients in this study. Triggering factors of poor glycaemic control should be taken into consideration by the healthcare professionals in targeting multifaceted interventions to achieve good glycaemic control.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document