The growing geriatric prison population: A dire public health consequence of mass incarceration

Author(s):  
Brie Williams ◽  
Michele DiTomas ◽  
Alison Pachynski
2021 ◽  
pp. 146247452110060
Author(s):  
Amy E Lerman ◽  
Alyssa C Mooney

Nationwide, prison populations have declined nearly 5% from their peak, and 16 states have seen double-digit declines. It is unclear, though, how decarceration has affected racial disparities. Using national data, we find substantial variation in state prison populations from 2005–2018, with increases in some states and declines in others. However, although declines in the overall state prison population were associated with declines for all groups, states with rising prison populations experienced slight upticks in prison rates among the white population, while rates among Black and Latinx populations declined. As a result, greater progress in overall decarceration within states did not translate to larger reductions in racial disparities. At the same time, we do not find evidence that a decline in prison populations is associated with a rise in jail incarceration for any racial/ethnic group. In additional exploratory analyses, we suggest that recent incarceration trends may be driven by changes in returns to prison for probation and parole violations, rather than commitments for new crimes. Our results make clear that while efforts to reverse mass incarceration have reduced the size of prison populations in some states, they have not yet made substantial progress in resolving the crisis of race in American criminal justice.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongbo Liu ◽  
Xiang Gao ◽  
Guoyong Wang ◽  
Jianjun Zhang ◽  
Jiajie Zhou ◽  
...  

The COVID-19 pandemic and the continued spreading of the SARS-CoV-2 variants have brought a grave public health consequence and severely devastated the global economy with recessions. Vaccination is considered as one of the most promising and efficient methods to end the COVID-19 pandemic and mitigate the disease conditions if infected. Although a few vaccines have been developed with an unprecedented speed, scientists around the world are continuing pursuing the best possible vaccines with innovations. Comparing to the expensive mRNA vaccines and attenuated/inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, recombinant protein vaccines have certain advantages, including their safety (non-virus components), potential stronger immunogenicity, broader protection, ease of scaling-up production, reduced cost, etc. In this study, we reported a novel COVID-19 vaccine generated with RBD-HR1/HR2 hexamer that was creatively fused with the RBD domain and heptad repeat 1 (HR1) or heptad repeat 2 (HR2) to form a dumbbell-shaped hexamer to target the spike S1 subunit. The novel hexamer COVID-19 vaccine induced high titers of neutralizing antibody in mouse studies (>100,000), and further experiments also showed that the vaccine also induced an alternative antibody to the HR1 region, which probably alleviated the drop of immunogenicity from the frequent mutations of SARS-CoV-2.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Tony N. Brown ◽  
Julian Culver ◽  
Asia Bento

<p> <strong>Objective: </strong>To build upon research that inves­tigates the health significance of familial and former incarceration with special emphasis on obesity risk among native-born Black (ie, African American) men.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the 2001-2003 National Survey of American Life (NSAL), focusing on native-born Black men (n=1140), the demographic group that bears the brunt of mass incarceration. The out­come of interest was obesity as measured by body mass index (BMI)&gt;30. Principal predic­tors were familial and former incarceration, and their statistical interaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In survey-adjusted binomial logistic regression models, familial incarceration ap­peared an unimportant predictor; whereas, former incarceration associated with a lower risk of obesity. However, former incarceration modifies the association between familial incarceration and obesity, such that native-born Black men experiencing both familial and former incarceration were significantly more likely to be obese.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Public health researchers should treat former incarceration with greater care in studies including native-born Black men because time spent incarcerated has lingering physical health significance.</p><p><em>Ethn Dis. </em>2018;28(2):69-74; doi:10.18865/ ed.28.2.69.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  

Abstract According to the latest data, in 2018 about 590,000 people were held in prison on any given day in the EU, and more than double in the entire region. People in prison face multiple and complex health care issues, including a higher prevalence of communicable diseases than the general population. These are likely to be the result of a combination of overlapping, and sometimes interlinked, risk factors for infection, ill-health, and incarceration, such as problem drug use. Incarceration may facilitate the offer of quality health care services to people who are otherwise hard to reach and provide an occasion to target socially deprived groups who often have low level of healthcare access when in the community. Delivering health protection and harm reduction programmes in prisons not only benefits the prison population but also has the potential to reduce the risk of transmission of some infectious diseases in the community, intervening earlier in the natural history of disease. They are also likely also to have a knock-on effect in supporting individuals’ reintegration into community life and future health - providing a ‘community dividend’ to health interventions in prisons. Yet, such health gains may be diminished by suboptimal integration with community services. Continuity of care, or throughcare, between prison and community services is a mainstay of any health care interventions delivered in detention, especially when tackling chronic conditions (e.g. HIV, mental illnesses) or problem drug use. The World Health Organization (WHO) has long supported the concept of prison health as an inseparable component of public health. This view is enshrined by the principle of Equivalence of Care between prison and community, endorsed by the United Nations in the Nelson Mandela Rules. During the 2019 WHO Prison Health Conference in Helsinki, it was acknowledged that prisons contribute to achieving the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals through improving health, reducing health inequalities and provide a fairer and safer society for all. However, a number of challenges hampers the successful implementation of such a concept, including the need for evidence-based decision making, inter-sectoral partnerships and adequate monitoring systems. This workshop will provide attendees with a comprehensive overview of prison health and the relevance of a multi-sectorial public health approach to frame and address it. The workshop will be structured around three main topics: governance of prison health and current models in Europe; health issues and disease burden in the prison population; current and future perspectives for evidence-based approaches to prison health. The discussion of two case studies, problem drug use and HCV micro-elimination, will create the context for an in-depth analysis of key challenges for prison health implementation, reflecting on aspects such as health needs, equity, multidisciplinarity, continuity of care, monitoring and community dividend. Key messages Provide a comprehensive picture of the main challenges of prison health in Europe, the public health issues affecting the prison population and how these relate to community public health systems. Reflect on how public health systems need to incorporate prison health into their strategies for reducing inequalities and improving health outcomes of vulnerable and socially deprived populations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 1120-1136
Author(s):  
B Jewell Bohlinger

Over the past 30 years the U.S. prison population has exploded. With the impact of climate change already here, we are also seeing new critiques of mass incarceration emerge, namely their environmental impact. In response to these burgeoning critiques as well as calls to action by the Justice Department to implement more sustainable and cost-effective strategies in prisons, the United States is experiencing a surge in prison sustainability programs throughout the country. Although sustainability is an important challenge facing the world, this paper argues that while “greening” programs seem like attempts to reform current methods of imprisonment, sustainability programming is an extension of the neoliberalization of incarceration in the United States. By emphasizing cost cutting while individualizing rehabilitation, prisons mobilize sustainability programming to produce “green prisoners” who are willing to take responsibility for their rehabilitation and diminish their economically burdensome behaviors (i.e. excessive wastefulness). Using semi-structure journals and interviews at three Oregon prisons, this paper investigates these ideas through the lens of the Sustainability in Prisons Project.


2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael T. Light ◽  
Joey Marshall

The justifications for the dramatic expansion of the prison population in recent decades have focused on public safety. Prior research on the efficacy of incarceration offers support for such claims, suggesting that increased incarceration saves lives by reducing the prevalence of homicide. We challenge this view by arguing that the effects of mass incarceration include collateral infant mortality consequences that call into question the number of lives saved through increased imprisonment. Using an instrumental variable estimation on state-level data from 1978 to 2010, this article simultaneously considers the effects of imprisonment on homicide and infant mortality to examine two of the countervailing mortality consequences of mass incarceration. Results suggest that while incarceration saves lives by lowering homicide rates, these gains are largely offset by the increases in infant mortality. Adjusted figures that count the number of increased infant deaths attributable to incarceration suggest that the mortality benefits of imprisonment over the past three decades are 82% lower than previously thought.


The Lancet ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 389 (10077) ◽  
pp. 1464-1474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Wildeman ◽  
Emily A Wang

1991 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Haycock

By contrast with the attention that jail suicide has received in the last decade, suicide among longer-term prisoners has occasioned little public concern and less scholarly interest. This article reviews recent empirical studies of prison suicides, whose results call into question the conventional belief that longer-term prisoners rarely kill themselves. These studies suggest that completed suicide in prison is a serious public health problem, and that for certain sub-groups, the risks of completed suicide approach, and perhaps exceed those of jail detainees. Recent research bears out the connection between outward-turned aggression and suicide, and raises doubts about conventional conceptions of the anti-social personality. The implications for future suicide rates of the “graying” of the prison population, and of the AIDS epidemic within prisons are discussed, as are the needs for future research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document