Purification of Raw Cane Sugar by Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration Process Using Linear Alkylbenzene Sulphonate

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. e12953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vahid Hakimzadeh ◽  
S.M. Mousavi ◽  
M. Elahi ◽  
S.M.A. Razavi
Keyword(s):  
Cane Sugar ◽  
Linear Alkylbenzene ◽  
Linear Alkylbenzene Sulphonate ◽  
Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration ◽  
Ultrafiltration Process

Recovery of Anionic Surfactant Through Acidification/Ultrafiltration in a Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration Process for Cobalt Removal

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 493-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Tortora ◽  
Valentina Innocenzi ◽  
Ida De Michelis ◽  
Francesco Vegliò ◽  
Giuseppe Mazziotti di Celso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anionic Surfactant ◽  
Cobalt Removal ◽  
Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration ◽  
Ultrafiltration Process

Effect of linear alkylbenzene sulphonate (LAS) on non-specific defence mechanisms in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tülay Bakırel ◽  
Oya Keleş ◽  
Süheyla Karataş ◽  
Mukaddes Özcan ◽  
Gülhan Türkmen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rainbow Trout ◽  
Oncorhynchus Mykiss ◽  
Defence Mechanisms ◽  
Linear Alkylbenzene ◽  
Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus Mykiss ◽  
Linear Alkylbenzene Sulphonate

Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration process for the treatment of olive mill wastewater

2011 ◽  
Vol 45 (15) ◽  
pp. 4522-4530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdelilah El-Abbassi ◽  
Mohamed Khayet ◽  
Abdellatif Hafidi
Keyword(s):  
Olive Mill Wastewater ◽  
Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration ◽  
Ultrafiltration Process ◽  
Olive Mill

Comparison of polymeric and ceramic membranes performance in the process of micellar enhanced ultrafiltration of cadmium(II) ions from aqueous solutions

2013 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Staszak ◽  
Zofia Karaś ◽  
Karolina Jaworska
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fouling ◽  
Permeability Coefficient ◽  
Ceramic Membrane ◽  
Polymer Membranes ◽  
Ceramic Membranes ◽  
Micellar Systems ◽  
Efficiency And Effectiveness ◽  
Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration ◽  
Hydrodynamic Permeability ◽  
Ultrafiltration Process

AbstractA comparison of polymeric and ceramic membranes in the ultrafiltration process was studied and presented. This study was conducted on the separation of cadmium(II) ions, with particular reference to parameters such as hydrodynamic permeability coefficient, membrane fouling, amount of surfactant in the permeate, efficiency, and effectiveness of the process. The effect of ionic (SDS) and non-ionic (Rofam 10) surfactants or their mixture was investigated. The hydrodynamic permeability coefficient of the ceramic membrane was found to be much lower in comparison to those of the polymeric ones (1.69 × 10−7 m3 h−1 m−2 Pa−1, 5.66 × 10−7 m3 h−1 m−2 Pa−1, and 9.26 × 10−7 m3 h−1 m−2 Pa−1 for ceramic, CA, and PVDF, respectively). However, filtration of the surfactants solutions did not cause permanent blocking of pores and the surface of the ceramic membrane in contrast to the polymeric ones. No significant differences in surfactants permeation through the membranes tested were observed. Concentration of the surfactant in the permeate was lower than 1 CMC for the Rofam 10 solution and exceeded the CMC by about 40 % for the SDS solution. Better separation properties of polymer membranes for the separation of cadmium(II) ions from micellar systems were identified.

Iso‐Branching of linear alkylbenzene sulphonate (LAS). Biodegradation study of two model compounds

1996 ◽  
Vol 54 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 167-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Cavalli ◽  
G. Cassani ◽  
M. Lazzarin ◽  
C. Maraschin ◽  
G. Nucci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Model Compounds ◽  
Linear Alkylbenzene ◽  
Biodegradation Study ◽  
Linear Alkylbenzene Sulphonate
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document