Recovery of Anionic Surfactant Through Acidification/Ultrafiltration in a Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration Process for Cobalt Removal

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 493-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Tortora ◽  
Valentina Innocenzi ◽  
Ida De Michelis ◽  
Francesco Vegliò ◽  
Giuseppe Mazziotti di Celso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anionic Surfactant ◽  
Cobalt Removal ◽  
Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration ◽  
Ultrafiltration Process

Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration process for the treatment of olive mill wastewater

2011 ◽  
Vol 45 (15) ◽  
pp. 4522-4530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdelilah El-Abbassi ◽  
Mohamed Khayet ◽  
Abdellatif Hafidi
Keyword(s):  
Olive Mill Wastewater ◽  
Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration ◽  
Ultrafiltration Process ◽  
Olive Mill

Comparison of polymeric and ceramic membranes performance in the process of micellar enhanced ultrafiltration of cadmium(II) ions from aqueous solutions

2013 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Staszak ◽  
Zofia Karaś ◽  
Karolina Jaworska
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fouling ◽  
Permeability Coefficient ◽  
Ceramic Membrane ◽  
Polymer Membranes ◽  
Ceramic Membranes ◽  
Micellar Systems ◽  
Efficiency And Effectiveness ◽  
Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration ◽  
Hydrodynamic Permeability ◽  
Ultrafiltration Process

AbstractA comparison of polymeric and ceramic membranes in the ultrafiltration process was studied and presented. This study was conducted on the separation of cadmium(II) ions, with particular reference to parameters such as hydrodynamic permeability coefficient, membrane fouling, amount of surfactant in the permeate, efficiency, and effectiveness of the process. The effect of ionic (SDS) and non-ionic (Rofam 10) surfactants or their mixture was investigated. The hydrodynamic permeability coefficient of the ceramic membrane was found to be much lower in comparison to those of the polymeric ones (1.69 × 10−7 m3 h−1 m−2 Pa−1, 5.66 × 10−7 m3 h−1 m−2 Pa−1, and 9.26 × 10−7 m3 h−1 m−2 Pa−1 for ceramic, CA, and PVDF, respectively). However, filtration of the surfactants solutions did not cause permanent blocking of pores and the surface of the ceramic membrane in contrast to the polymeric ones. No significant differences in surfactants permeation through the membranes tested were observed. Concentration of the surfactant in the permeate was lower than 1 CMC for the Rofam 10 solution and exceeded the CMC by about 40 % for the SDS solution. Better separation properties of polymer membranes for the separation of cadmium(II) ions from micellar systems were identified.

Simultaneous removal of phenols and Cr3+ using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration process

Desalination ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 191 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 111-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Witek ◽  
Andrzej Kołtuniewicz ◽  
Bartosz Kurczewski ◽  
Mariola Radziejowska ◽  
Marcin Hatalski
Keyword(s):  
Simultaneous Removal ◽  
Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration ◽  
Ultrafiltration Process

Assessment of the micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration process with a tight UF membrane for the removal of aniline from water

2013 ◽  
Vol 52 (31-33) ◽  
pp. 5748-5756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bahareh Tanhaei ◽  
Mahdi Pourafshari Chenar ◽  
Nasser Saghatoleslami ◽  
Mehrdad Hesampour ◽  
Mari Kallioinen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration ◽  
Ultrafiltration Process

Treatment of edible oil processing wastewater using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration process

2013 ◽  
Vol 52 (13-15) ◽  
pp. 2412-2418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shadi Sharifi ◽  
Hossein Alizadeh Golestani ◽  
Mahnaz Afifi ◽  
Shirin Kiani
Keyword(s):  
Edible Oil ◽  
Oil Processing ◽  
Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration ◽  
Ultrafiltration Process
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document