scholarly journals Global change, life‐history complexity and the potential for evolutionary rescue

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 1189-1201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dustin J. Marshall ◽  
Scott C. Burgess ◽  
Tim Connallon
Ecosphere ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e02274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan A. Walter ◽  
Anthony R. Ives ◽  
John F. Tooker ◽  
Derek M. Johnson

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 1266-1277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca M. Swab ◽  
Helen M. Regan ◽  
David A. Keith ◽  
Tracey J. Regan ◽  
Mark K. J. Ooi

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1672-1684 ◽  
Author(s):  
FRÉDÉRIC JIGUET ◽  
ANNE-SOPHIE GADOT ◽  
ROMAIN JULLIARD ◽  
STUART E. NEWSON ◽  
DENIS COUVET

2020 ◽  
pp. 285-288
Author(s):  
Kevin S. McCann ◽  
Gabriel Gellner

This chapter will reflect on the chapters in this book and suggest directions and gaps that theory will have to consider as we move forward. Our goal here is to motivate future work in light of the developments discussed in this book. We will emphasize the role of the empirical-theoretical connection that will be a thread across chapters. Clearly, eco-evolutionary theoretical developments are currently being developed, and we imagine and hope that future versions of theoretical ecology will reveal strong growth in this important area. Much work is being developed related to evolutionary response to global change (e.g., evolutionary rescue). Again, consistent with the themes being developed in this book, we would argue that this multi-disciplinarian approach to theory (evolution and ecology, agriculture and ecology, economics and ecology, society and ecology) have become part of the toolbox of modern ecology and modern theoretical ecology and likely will play a massive role in future theoretical development.


2012 ◽  
Vol 367 (1596) ◽  
pp. 1647-1664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandrine Meylan ◽  
Donald B. Miles ◽  
Jean Clobert

A challenge to ecologists and evolutionary biologists is predicting organismal responses to the anticipated changes to global ecosystems through climate change. Most evidence suggests that short-term global change may involve increasing occurrences of extreme events, therefore the immediate response of individuals will be determined by physiological capacities and life-history adaptations to cope with extreme environmental conditions. Here, we consider the role of hormones and maternal effects in determining the persistence of species in altered environments. Hormones, specifically steroids, are critical for patterning the behaviour and morphology of parents and their offspring. Hence, steroids have a pervasive influence on multiple aspects of the offspring phenotype over its lifespan. Stress hormones, e.g. glucocorticoids, modulate and perturb phenotypes both early in development and later into adulthood. Females exposed to abiotic stressors during reproduction may alter the phenotypes by manipulation of hormones to the embryos. Thus, hormone-mediated maternal effects, which generate phenotypic plasticity, may be one avenue for coping with global change. Variation in exposure to hormones during development influences both the propensity to disperse, which alters metapopulation dynamics, and population dynamics, by affecting either recruitment to the population or subsequent life-history characteristics of the offspring. We suggest that hormones may be an informative index to the potential for populations to adapt to changing environments.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Kotchoubey

Abstract Life History Theory (LHT) predicts a monotonous relationship between affluence and the rate of innovations and strong correlations within a cluster of behavioral features. Although both predictions can be true in specific cases, they are incorrect in general. Therefore, the author's explanations may be right, but they do not prove LHT and cannot be generalized to other apparently similar processes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document