Cytological features of BCOR‐CCNB3 sarcoma: Comparison with Ewing sarcoma and synovial sarcoma

Cytopathology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiori Watabe ◽  
Yoshinao Kikuchi ◽  
Junji Mukaiyama ◽  
Tomomi Kato ◽  
Kenji Sato ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Peter Wu ◽  
Benjamin T. Cooper ◽  
Fang Bu ◽  
Christopher J. Bowman ◽  
J. Keith Killian ◽  
...  

Purpose Pediatric sarcomas provide a unique diagnostic challenge. There is considerable morphologic overlap between entities, increasing the importance of molecular studies in the diagnosis, treatment, and identification of therapeutic targets. We developed and validated a genome-wide DNA methylation–based classifier to differentiate between osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and synovial sarcoma. Methods DNA methylation status of 482,421 CpG sites in 10 Ewing sarcoma, 11 synovial sarcoma, and 15 osteosarcoma samples were determined using the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 array. We developed a random forest classifier trained from the 400 most differentially methylated CpG sites within the training set of 36 sarcoma samples. This classifier was validated on data drawn from The Cancer Genome Atlas synovial sarcoma, TARGET-Osteosarcoma, and a recently published series of Ewing sarcoma. Results Methylation profiling revealed three distinct patterns, each enriched with a single sarcoma subtype. Within the validation cohorts, all samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas were accurately classified as synovial sarcoma (10 of 10; sensitivity and specificity, 100%), all but one sample from TARGET-Osteosarcoma were classified as osteosarcoma (85 of 86; sensitivity, 98%; specificity, 100%), and 14 of 15 Ewing sarcoma samples were classified correctly (sensitivity, 93%; specificity, 100%). The single misclassified osteosarcoma sample demonstrated high EWSR1 and ETV1 expression on RNA sequencing, although no fusion was found on manual curation of the transcript sequence. Two additional clinical samples that were difficult to classify by morphology and molecular methods were classified as osteosarcoma; one had been suspected of being a synovial sarcoma and the other of being Ewing sarcoma on initial diagnosis. Conclusion Osteosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, and Ewing sarcoma have distinct epigenetic profiles. Our validated methylation-based classifier can be used to provide diagnostic assistance when histologic and standard techniques are inconclusive.


2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 174-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Rooper ◽  
Rajni Sharma ◽  
Christopher D. Gocke ◽  
Deborah A. Belchis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Lucy M. Han ◽  
Christopher J. VandenBussche ◽  
Mads Abildtrup ◽  
Ashish Chandra ◽  
Poonam Vohra

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Small round cell tumors (SRCTs) are a broad category of diverse malignant tumors composed of monotonous undifferentiated cells. Involvement of serous fluids by SRCT is rare; however, the identification of exfoliated malignant cells is a crucial component of management and has significant implications for treatment and prognosis. The most common effusion tumors with SRCT morphology include Ewing sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNC), and desmoplastic SRCT, and the cytomorphologic distinction between these tumors is challenging. The purpose of this article is to describe the morphologic features of the most common SRCT in fluids and propose helpful ancillary testing. <b><i>Summary:</i></b> Effusion SRCTs display similar primitive and undifferentiated morphologic features although each has subtle variations. Ewing sarcoma is a mesenchymal neoplasm and harbors characteristic translocations t(11;22) (<i>EWSR1-FLI1</i>) or t(21;22) (<i>EWSR1-ERG</i>). In fluids, Ewing sarcoma shows poorly differentiated cells of variable size with round to oval nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and scant cytoplasm. In contrast, synovial sarcoma typically involves extremities and expresses a fusion transcript in t(X;18) (<i>SS18-SSX</i>). This soft tissue neoplasm demonstrates uniform cells with irregular nuclear contours, characteristic nuclear folding, and scant cytoplasm. RMS is a neoplasm arising from skeletal muscle, and the alveolar subtype demonstrates a translocation in t(2;13) (<i>PAX3-FOXO1</i>). The malignant cells show a spectrum of small round cells and pleomorphic large cells with rhabdoid morphology. RMS cells characteristically express myogenin and MyoD1, markers of skeletal muscle differentiation. Although SCNC is not a classic SRCT, the morphology is similar. SCNC demonstrates tight clusters of malignant cells with nuclear molding and salt-and-pepper chromatin. This tumor classically has neuroendocrine differentiation and is positive for synaptophysin and chromogranin on immunohistochemistry. And last, desmoplastic SRCT typically presents as an intra-abdominal mass in young men and characteristically harbors the translocation t(11;22) (p13;q12) (<i>EWSR1-WT1</i>). Cytomorphologically, the tumor shows small monomorphic cells occasionally arranged as rosette-like structures. <b><i>Key Message:</i></b> The diagnosis of SRCT can be made in effusion samples and is best achieved with a combination of morphologic features, clinical history, and ancillary testing.


2016 ◽  
Vol 212 (7) ◽  
pp. 658-664
Author(s):  
Jasper Bruyneel ◽  
Jo Van Dorpe ◽  
Marleen Praet ◽  
Bart Matthys ◽  
Nadine Van Roy ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10040-10040
Author(s):  
Byung-Kiu Park ◽  
Hee Young Ju ◽  
Meerim Park ◽  
Hyeon Jin Park

10040 Background: No standard salvage regimen is available for recurrent or refractory sarcoma. Only a few studies using vincristine (V), irinotecan (I), and temozolomide (T) for rhabdomyosarcoma or Ewing sarcoma have been conducted mostly in pediatric age. We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of VIT regimen for several relapsed or refractory sarcomas in children and young adults. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the relapsed or refractory sarcoma patients who were treated at the Center for Pediatric Cancer of the National Cancer Center, Korea between 2012 and 2018. VIT regimen given every 3 week schedule was as follows; V, 1.5mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, I, 50mg/m2 i.v. on days 1-5, and T, 100mg/m2 p.o. on days 1-5. Cefixime prophylaxis at 4mg/kg/day p.o. was administered to reduce irinotecan-induced diarrhea. Results: Total 26 patients (12 males) were treated with VIT during the study period. Patients were diagnosed with rhabdomyosarcoma ( n= 8), osteosarcoma ( n= 7), Ewing sarcoma ( n= 3), synovial sarcoma ( n= 3), alveolar soft part sarcoma ( n= 2), and mixed rhabdomyosarcoma and liposarcoma, hemangiopericytoma and desmoplastic small round cell tumor, one for each. Median age at the start of VIT was 18.5 years (range 2.0-39.9). VIT was delivered as the 2nd to 7th line of treatment, with the 4th line most common (9/26, 34.6%). Number of administered courses were 1-18, with two courses most common (6/26, 23.1%). Of the 25 evaluable patients, we had 2 partial response (PR), 13 stable disease (SD), and 11 progressive disease (PD) with an overall control rate (CR + PR + SD) of 60.0% as assessed by RECIST 1.1. According to diagnoses, we observed 4SD and 4PD for rhabdomyosarcoma; 1PR, 2SD and 4PD for osteosarcoma; 1PR, 1SD and 1 non-evaluable for Ewing sarcoma; 2SD and 1PD for synovial sarcoma; 2SD for alveolar soft part sarcoma. With a median follow-up of 24 months, 5 patients were alive without disease; 9 were alive with disease; 12 died of PD. Progression-free survival rate at one year was 33.8%, and overall survival rate was 79.3% at one year and 45.5% at 2 years. Of the 26 patients, two patients had grade 4 neutropenia; two had grade 3 colitis and another two had grade 3 neutropenic fever; 8 had grade 2 diarrhea. Grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity or treatment-related mortality was not observed. Conclusions: VIT was effective especially for disease control and relatively safe in our cohort of sarcoma patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Vincenza Rita Lo Vasco ◽  
Martina Leopizzi ◽  
Anna Scotto d’Abusco ◽  
Carlo Della Rocca

Background: Bone hardness and strength depends on mineralization, which involves a complex process in which calcium phosphate, produced by bone-forming cells, was shed around the fibrous matrix. This process is strictly regulated, and a number of signal transduction systems were interested in calcium metabolism, such as the phosphoinositide (PI) pathway and related phospholipase C (PLC) enzymes. Objectives: Our aim was to search for common patterns of expression in osteoblasts, as well as in ES and SS. Methods: We analysed the PLC enzymes in human osteoblasts and osteosarcoma cell lines MG-63 and SaOS-2. We compared the obtained results to the expression of PLCs in samples of patients affected with Ewing sarcoma (ES) and synovial sarcoma (SS). Results: In osteoblasts, MG-63 cells and SaOS-2 significant differences were identified in the expression of PLC δ4 and PLC η subfamily isoforms. Differences were also identified regarding the expression of PLCs in ES and SS. Most ES and SS did not express PLCB1, which was expressed in most osteoblasts, MG-63 and SaOS-2 cells. Conversely, PLCB2, unexpressed in the cell lines, was expressed in some ES and SS. However, PLCH1 was expressed in SaOS-2 and inconstantly expressed in osteoblasts, while it was expressed in ES and unexpressed in SS. The most relevant difference observed in ES compared to SS regarded PLC ε and PLC η isoforms. Conclusion: MG-63 and SaOS-2 osteosarcoma cell lines might represent an inappropriate experimental model for studies about the analysis of signal transduction in osteoblasts


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document