Two Types of ${E}^{\prime}$ Centers as Gate Oxide Defects Responsible for Hole Trapping and Random Telegraph Signals in pMOSFETs

2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (10) ◽  
pp. 4527-4534 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.S.M. Shamsur Rouf ◽  
Zeynep Celik-Butler ◽  
Fan-Chi Hou ◽  
Shaoping Tang ◽  
Guru Mathur
1996 ◽  
Vol 35 (Part 1, No. 2B) ◽  
pp. 812-817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manabu Itsumi ◽  
Hideo Akiya ◽  
Takemi Ueki ◽  
Masato Tomita ◽  
Masataka Yamawaki

2016 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 52-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Kaczer ◽  
J. Franco ◽  
P. Weckx ◽  
Ph.J. Roussel ◽  
M. Simicic ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 924 ◽  
pp. 735-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selamnesh Nida ◽  
Thomas Ziemann ◽  
Bhagyalakshmi Kakarla ◽  
Ulrike Grossner

When power MOSFETs experience a voltage spike initiating avalanche generation, a large amount of power is dissipated at the device junction. This leads to self-heating and lowers the threshold voltage. Some sources indicate that unintended opening of the channel creates a positive feedback, thereby increasing heat generation and leading to thermal runaway. Therefore, keeping MOSFETs off by applying a negative gate bias should improve avalanche ruggedness. In this report, this claim is investigated by comparing single pulse avalanche ruggedness of commercial 1.2 kV, 80 mΩ planar and trench MOSFETs at -10 V and 0 V off-state gate bias. Both planar and trench devices show a small increase in their breakdown voltage with negative gate bias. However, there is no significant difference in avalanche withstanding energy. Even in investigated trench gate devices where the gate oxide is susceptible to interface as well as oxide defects, keeping the gate voltage at VGS = -10 V did not result in improvements in ruggedness.


Author(s):  
Hung-Sung Lin ◽  
Chun-Ming Chen

Abstract The importance of understanding mismatched behavior in SRAM devices has increased as the technology node has shrunk below 100nm. Using the nanoprobe technique [1-3], the MOS characteristics of failure bits in actual SRAM cells have been directly measured. After transistors that are failing were identified, the best approach for identifying nanoscale defects was determined. In this study, several types of nanoscale defects, such as offset spacer residue, salicide missing from the active area, doping missing from the channel, gate oxide defects, contact barrier layer residue, and severed poly-gate silicide were successfully discovered.


Author(s):  
Nathan Wang ◽  
Sabbas Daniel

Abstract This paper describes the FA technique to identify very tiny defects that cause gate oxide damage. These defects as examples include crystal originated pits, gate oxide pinhole and residual. The defects may have the same electrical signature; the same kind of in gate oxide will be seen when the sample is simply deprocessed with wet chemical and observed with SEM; but they are distinctly different mechanisms. Electrical test, emission microscope, FIB and SEM were used to localize the defect and TEM for the final analysis. The application of planeview, cross-sectional and three-dimensional TEM is discussed.


Author(s):  
M. Hellenbrand ◽  
E. Memisevic ◽  
J. Svensson ◽  
A. Krishnaraja ◽  
E. Lind ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document