Larval Development of the Native Elm Bark Beetle, Hylurgopinus rufipes (Eich.), in Massachusetts*

1939 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. B. Beckeb
Author(s):  

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Hylurgopinus rufipes (Eichh.) (Hylastes rufipes[Hylurgopinus rufipes] Eichh.) (Col., Scolytidae) (Native Elm Bark Beetle). Host Plants: Ulmus spp. (A vector of Dutch Elm Disease) Information is given on the geographical distribution in NORTH AMERICA, Canada, U.S.A.


1981 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. M. Gardiner

AbstractDaily trapping of native elm bark beetles, Hylurgopinus rufipes (Eichh.), in central Ontario showed that the population is divided into fairly discrete overwintering adult and larval groups. Group proportions depend on the stage of development of the local beetle infestation and disease infection. Both beetles and disease are spread by mass movement of beetles, in late summer and fall, in search of living elm trees in which to feed and overwinter.


1979 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 353-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Takai ◽  
E. S. Kondo ◽  
J. B. Thomas

Adults of the North American native elm bark beetle, Hylurgopinus rufipes, naturally infested with Dutch elm disease fungus, Ceratocystis ulmi, were caged on trunks of white elms (Ulmus americana) so that infection could be studied. In surveys made in 1971, expression of external symptoms of Dutch elm disease was observed on elms which had been caged with beetles during the period May 26 to July 9, 1971. Vascular discoloration (internal symptom expression), fungus spread, fungus contamination of beetles, and transmission of fungus to the host by beetles were pronounced on elms caged with beetles from June 3 to July 2. Ceratocystis ulmi was recovered from leaves of trees caged during the period May 26 to July 2. Until May 31, 1972, dieback and death resulting from infection were restricted to trees caged with beetles during June. Corresponding development of vascular discoloration and fungus spread in the host also occurred, mostly during the caging period in June. There was no appreciable change in beetle activity in xylem tissue during the period of experiment. These results suggest that the period of highest susceptibility of white elm to Dutch elm disease in 1971 in central Ontario was June 3 to July 2.Inoculation through feeding by caged beetles carrying C. ulmi is probably the method that most closely approximates natural infection.


2008 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-122
Author(s):  
Irene Pines ◽  
Richard Westwood

Six mark-recapture experiments were conducted in Manitoba, Canada, to determine the effectiveness of fluorescent powder to mark emerging native elm bark beetle adults, Hylurgopinus rufipes (Eichoff) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), the vector of Dutch elm disease, Ophiostoma novo-ulmi (Brazier), after departure from overwintering sites in spring and emergence from broodwood in summer. Native elm bark beetles marked themselves on emergence from overwintering sites and summer trap logs. The spring and summer periods of flight activity for unmarked and marked beetles were similar. Marked beetles were captured over 1 month after peak emergence in the spring and 2 months after emergence from trap logs in the summer. Marked beetles were captured up to 1 km (0.6 mi) from release sites. Where integrated Dutch elm disease management activities are implemented in buffer zones to minimize the number of elm bark beetles entering community urban forests, buffer zones should be a minimum of 1 km (0.6 mi) in width.


1981 ◽  
Vol 113 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Buth ◽  
R. A. Ellis

The first outbreak of Dutch elm disease in Manitoba was recorded in 1975 in Brandon, Selkirk, and Winnipeg (Hildahl 1977). The primary vector of the disease in Canada is the native elm bark beetle, Hylurgopinus rufipes (Eichh.). The smaller European elm bark beetle, Scolytus multistriatus (Marsh.), is considered the primary vector in most of the United States. In Canada, the latter species occurs throughout most of southern Ontario, parts of south-central Quebec, and has been recorded in New Bmnswick (Sterner et al. 1976).


1961 ◽  
Vol 93 (5) ◽  
pp. 403-405
Author(s):  
W. Y. Watson ◽  
W. L. Sippell

Although many possible vectors of the Dutch elm disease, Ceratocystis ulmi (Buism.) C. Moreau, have been listed by Collins et al. (1936) and others, only two, Scolytus multistriatus (Marsh.), the European elm bark beetle, and Hylurgopinus rufipes (Eichh.), the native elm bark beetle, are known to transmit the disease with any regularity. In this capacity alone thcse two species of beetles are important pests of elm. The persistent spread of the Dutch elm disease in southern Ontario (Hord and Quirke, 1955) made it imperative that adequate surveys be maintained to indicate yearly changes in the occurrence of the introduced vector, and to ascertain more precisely the distribution of the native vector relative to the distribution of elm in Ontario. Consequently the Forest Insect Survey of the Forest Insect Laboratory, Sault Ste. Marie, intensified its elm bark beetle program in 1956, and from then to 1959, 138 positive samples of these two scolytid beetles have been received. An analvsis of these records and their relationihip to the current incidence of the Dutch elm disease in Ontario are presented in this paper.


1988 ◽  
Vol 120 (12) ◽  
pp. 1041-1050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul D. Swedenborg ◽  
Richard L. Jones ◽  
Mark E. Ascerno ◽  
Val R. Landwehr

AbstractField tests, using bolts of American elm trees either uninfested or infested with laboratory-reared or feral Hylurgopinus rufipes (Eichhoff), the native elm bark beetle, were conducted to evaluate colonization behavior of the beetle. The data confirm that (1) colonization of elm by H. rufipes can be accounted for by host attractants alone; (2) overwintered adult H. rufipes are attracted to broodwood (moribund or recently cut elm) in the spring, but summer-emergent adults are attracted to healthy elm; and (3) H. rufipes attacks broodwood primarily during evening beetle flights, and females initiate the gallery. A beetle-produced sex pheromone may be involved in the male–female pairing on broodwood.


1989 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul D. Swedenborg ◽  
Richard L. Jones ◽  
Lee C. Ryker

AbstractMale native elm bark beetles, Hylurgopinus rufipes (Eichhoff), had distinctive simple multipulse stress and rivalry chirps, and a bimodally patterned premating stridulation at the gallery site. Males were strongly arrested at attractive female galleries. Not all female galleries were attractive to males. For a short period after the arrival of the first (resident) male, conspecific males often contested the resident male. Stridulation by females was not detected.


1984 ◽  
Vol 116 (9) ◽  
pp. 1251-1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L. Hanula ◽  
C. Wayne Berisford

AbstractThe smaller European elm bark beetle, Scolytus multistriatus (Marsham), had three distinct periods of adult flight annually in Georgia. Adults of the associated native elm bark beetle, Hylurgopinus rufipes Eichhoff, were trapped on elm logs during only one period in the spring, but some adults were reared from infested bolts in the fall. Seasonal abundance of the S. multistriatus parasite Spathius benefactor Matthews (Braconidae) showed little temporal relationship to its host. However, Entedon leucogramma Ratzeburg (Eulophidae) emergence was highly synchronized with S. multistriatus emergence. Scolytus multistriatus overwintered as fully developed larvae as in other parts of its range.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document