scholarly journals Bond Strengths of One-Step Self-Etch Adhesives to Laser-Irradiated and Bur-Cut Dentin After Water Storage and Thermocycling

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 214-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gulsah E Akin ◽  
Seyda Herguner-Siso ◽  
Mutlu Ozcan ◽  
Ozden Ozel-Bektas ◽  
Hakan Akin
Keyword(s):  
Water Storage ◽  
One Step ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Self Etch

scholarly journals Durability of Enamel Bonding Using One-step Self-etch Systems on Ground and Unground Enamel

10.2341/08-58 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Reis ◽  
S. K. Moura ◽  
A. Pellizzaro ◽  
K. Dal-Bianco ◽  
A. M. Andrade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
One Step ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance The improvement of resin-enamel bond strengths after using Si-C paper and diamond burs for enamel preparation is material dependent. No degradation of enamel bond strength could be observed for any one-step self-etch adhesive system after 12 months of water storage.

Effect of Cyclic Loading on the Microtensile Bond Strengths of Total-etch and Self-etch Adhesives

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Toledano ◽  
R. Osorio ◽  
A. Albaladejo ◽  
F. S. Aguilera ◽  
F. R. Tay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
One Step ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Etching System ◽  
Better Than

Clinical Relevance Resin-dentin bonds, which may have an influence on the long-term success of restorations, are prone to deterioration after cyclic loading. The tested one-step self-etching system (Etch&Prime 3.0) provided the least reliable dentin adhesion. After acid etching of dentin, alcohol/based adhesives performed better than those containing acetone as solvent.

Effect of Water Storage on Bond Strength of Self-etching Adhesives to Dentin

2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 46-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubens Nazareno Garcia ◽  
Mario Fernando de Goes ◽  
Marcelo Giannini
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Internal Diameter ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Effect Of Water ◽  
One Step ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
One Year

Abstract Aim The objective of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of self-etching adhesive systems one week and one year after storage in water. Methods and Materials Fragments from the buccal surfaces of 45 bovine teeth were prepared (12 mm in length X 5 mm in width X 1.0 mm in thickness). Dentin surfaces were wet-abraded with 600-grit SiC paper to create a standardized smear layer. Samples were randomly assigned to 18 experimental groups (n=5), according to nine adhesive systems tested (Single Bond; Adper Prompt L-Pop; iBond; One-Up Bond F; Xeno III; Clearfil SE Bond; Optibond Solo Plus SE; Tyrian SPE/One-Step Plus; and UniFil Bond) and two waterstorage times (one week and one year). Adhesives were applied according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Z250 composite was applied into the molds to fill up the internal diameter volume of a Tygon tubing mold (1.0 mm high / 0.7 mm internal diameter). Micro-shear bond strengths were determined using an apparatus attached to an Instron Universal Testing Machine (0.5 mm/min). Data were statistically analyzed using a twoway analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey's test (5%). Results One year after water storage the dentin bond strength of all adhesive systems reduced significantly, except for One-Up Bond F. Conclusion Water-storage time decreased the bond strength for most dentin bonding agents tested. Citation Garcia RN, de Goes MF, Giannini M. Effect of Water Storage on Bond Strength of Self-etching Adhesives to Dentin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 November; (8)7:046-053.

scholarly journals Effect of 3-year water storage on the performance of one-step self-etch adhesives applied actively on dentine

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 578-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Dourado Loguercio ◽  
Rodrigo Stanislawczuk ◽  
Alexandra Mena-Serrano ◽  
Alessandra Reis
Keyword(s):  
Water Storage ◽  
One Step ◽  
Self Etch

scholarly journals Bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives and their predecessors to ground versus unground enamel

2012 ◽  
Vol 06 (03) ◽  
pp. 280-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ruya Yazici ◽  
Zeren Yildirim ◽  
Atila Ertan ◽  
Gül Ozgunaltay ◽  
Berrin Dayangac ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Bonding Performance ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
One Step ◽  
Bonferroni Test ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Self Etch

ABSTRACTObjectives: The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of several self-etch adhesives to their two-step predecessors to ground and unground enamel.Methods: Seventy-five extracted, non-carious human third molar teeth were selected for this study. The buccal surfaces of each tooth were mechanically ground to obtain flat enamel surfaces (ground enamel), while the lingual surfaces were left intact (unground enamel). The teeth were randomly divided into five groups according to the adhesive systems (n=15): one-step self-etch adhesive - Clearfil S3 Bond, its two-step predecessor - Clearfil SE Bond, one-step self-etch adhesive - AdheSE One, and its two-step predecessor - AdheSE, and a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive - Adper Single Bond 2(control). After application of the adhesives to the buccal and lingual enamel surfaces of each tooth, a cylindrical capsule filled with a hybrid composite resin (TPH) was seated against the surfaces. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours, followed by thermocycling (5°C-55°C/500 cycles). They were subjected to shear bond strength test in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/minute. The data were compared using a two-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni test at P<.05Results: All adhesives exhibited statistically similar bond strengths to ground and unground enamel except for the etch-and-rinse adhesive that showed significantly higher bond strengths than the self-etch adhesives (P<.05). No significant differences in bond strength values were observed between ground and unground enamel for any of the adhesives tested (P=.17).Conclusions:Similar bond strengths to ground and unground enamel were achieved with one-step self-etch adhesives and their predecessors. Enamel preparation did not influence the bonding performance of the adhesives tested. (Eur J Dent 2012;6:280-286)

Effects of Additional Acid Etching on the Dentin Bond Strengths of One-Step Self-Etch Adhesives Applied to Primary Teeth

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuhyun Kim ◽  
Shin Kim ◽  
Taesung Jeong ◽  
Sung-Ae Son ◽  
Jiyeon Kim
Keyword(s):  
Primary Teeth ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
One Step ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Self Etch

scholarly journals Initial and long-term bond strengths of one-step self-etch adhesives with silane coupling agent to enamel-dentin-composite in combined situation

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 663-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teerapong MAMANEE ◽  
Masahiro TAKAHASHI ◽  
Masatoshi NAKAJIMA ◽  
Richard M. FOXTON ◽  
Junji TAGAMI
Keyword(s):  
Coupling Agent ◽  
Silane Coupling Agent ◽  
Silane Coupling ◽  
One Step ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Self Etch

scholarly journals Marginal Sealing Durability of Two Contemporary Self-Etch Adhesives

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Khoroushi ◽  
Mahsa Mansoori
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Dye Penetration ◽  
Marginal Integrity ◽  
One Step ◽  
Composite Resin Restorations ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Resin Restorations

Introduction. Sealing abilities of two self-etch adhesives were evaluated after two aging processes: storage in water and thermocycling. Materials and Methods. Cl V cavities were prepared on the buccal and lingual aspects of 48 human premolars, with cervical margins 1 mm below the CEJ. Clearfil Protect Bond (CPB) and BeautiBond (BB) (two-step and one-step self-etch adhesives, resp.) were applied, each to half of the cavities and restored with composite resin. Each group was randomly subdivided into 4 subgroups (n=12) and evaluated for dye penetration after 24 hours, after 3000 thermocycling rounds, after a 6-month water storage, and after 3000 thermocycling rounds plus 6-month water storage, respectively. Data was analyzed using SPSS 11.5 and Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (α=0.05). Results. There were no significant differences in enamel and dentin microleakage between the adhesives (P=0.683; P=0.154). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in enamel microleakage of each one of CPB and BB (P=0.061 and P=0.318, resp.). However, significant decrease was observed in subgroups 3 and 4 (P=0.001) for CPB dentinal margins. Conclusion. In this study, limited aging procedures had no influence on marginal integrity of composite resin restorations bonded with self-etch adhesives of CPB and BB. Furthermore, CPB dentinal sealing improved after aging.

Prolonged Curing Time Reduces the Effects of Simulated Pulpal Pressure on the Bond Strength of One-step Self-etch Adhesives

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 545-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
VP Feitosa ◽  
TF Watson ◽  
RP Vitti ◽  
A Bacchi ◽  
L Correr-Sobrinho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Mode ◽  
Pressure Control ◽  
Cohesive Failure ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Light Curing ◽  
One Step ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Self Etch

SUMMARY The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of extended light-curing procedures on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of one-step self-etch adhesives (1-SEAs) submitted to simulated pulpal pressure. Coronal deep-dentin specimens were bonded using Clearfil S3 Bond (S3), Adper Easy Bond (EB), or G-Bond Plus (GB) following the manufacturers' recommendations and light-cured for 10 seconds or 40 seconds. The dentin-bonded specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours without pulpal pressure (control) or submitted to 20 cm H2O simulated pulpal pressure for 24 hours. The specimens were cut into matchsticks and subjected to μTBS testing. The data were statistically analyzed using the three-way analysis of variance and Tukey's tests (p&lt;0.05). Debonded sticks were investigated through scanning electron microscopy. EB obtained higher bond strengths than GB and S3. However, prolonged light activation (40 seconds) provided higher μTBS for all adhesives when submitted to pulpal pressure. Conversely, pulpal pressure caused a drop in μTBS in EB and S3 when light-cured for 10 seconds. A mixed failure mode was mainly attained for the control groups, whereas the specimens submitted to pulpal pressure failed in the adhesive mode. The μTBS of GB was not affected by pulpal pressure when light-cured for 10 seconds. Adhesive was the most prevalent failure mode, except when light-cured for 40 seconds, which showed predominantly cohesive failure. Extended curing times improved the resistance of 1-SEAs to simulated pulpal pressure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document