Neighborhood Effects on Economic Self‐Sufficiency: A Reconsideration of the Moving to Opportunity Experiment

2008 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Clampet‐Lundquist ◽  
Douglas S. Massey
Author(s):  
Dionissi Aliprantis ◽  
Daniel Kolliner

Researchers suspect that some of the disparities that exist in such outcomes as health, employment, and education might be attributable to inequality of opportunity as determined by neighborhood environments. We study census data to identify neighborhood characteristics in addition to poverty that might help to explain these disparities. We focus on the Moving to Opportunity housing-relocation experiment and show that because program participants typically moved from one predominately black neighborhood to another, their new low-poverty neighborhoods may have provided little to no change in neighborhood quality. These circumstances are helpful in understanding how results from the Moving to Opportunity program should inform views of neighborhood effects.


2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 633-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dionissi Aliprantis ◽  
Francisca G.-C. Richter

This paper estimates neighborhood effects on adult labor market outcomes using the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) housing mobility experiment. We propose and implement a new strategy for identifying transition-specific effects that exploits identification of the unobserved component of a neighborhood choice model. Estimated local average treatment effects (LATEs) are large, result from moves between the first and second deciles of the national distribution of neighborhood quality, and pertain to a subpopulation of nine percent of program participants.


2013 ◽  
Vol 103 (3) ◽  
pp. 226-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Ludwig ◽  
Greg J Duncan ◽  
Lisa A Gennetian ◽  
Lawrence F Katz ◽  
Ronald C Kessler ◽  
...  

We examine long-term neighborhood effects on low-income families using data from the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) randomized housing-mobility experiment. This experiment offered to some public-housing families but not to others the chance to move to less-disadvantaged neighborhoods. We show that ten to 15 years after baseline, MTO: (i) improves adult physical and mental health; (ii) has no detectable effect on economic outcomes or youth schooling or physical health; and (iii) has mixed results by gender on other youth outcomes, with girls doing better on some measures and boys doing worse. Despite the somewhat mixed pattern of impacts on traditional behavioral outcomes, MTO moves substantially improve adult subjective well-being.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document