Chapter 2. L2 developmental education and systemic theoretical instruction

2018 ◽  
pp. 29-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
James P. Lantolf ◽  
Mei-Hsing Tsai
Keyword(s):  
Developmental Education

The State of Developmental Education

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara L. Parker ◽  
Michelle Sterk Barrett ◽  
Leticia Tomas Bustillos
Keyword(s):  
Developmental Education ◽  
The State

scholarly journals Do Colleges Perform the Same Following Developmental Education Reform? The Case of Florida’s Senate Bill 1720

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinye Hu ◽  
Shouping Hu
Keyword(s):  
Education Reform ◽  
Developmental Education ◽  
White Students ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Institutional Characteristics ◽  
College Level ◽  
Passing Rates ◽  
College System ◽  
Institutional Differences ◽  
Florida College

AbstractDevelopmental education (DE) reform took place among the 28 Florida College System (FCS) institutions in 2014. In this study, we examine how cohort-based passing rates in college-level English and math courses changed at different colleges for pre- and post-policy period and explore what institutional characteristics were related with various institutional trajectories of cohort-based course passing rates in the post-policy period. Employing longitudinal data analysis, we found that colleges performed similarly regarding cohort-based passing rates in both college-level English and combined math courses before DE reform and had a similar elevation in the cohort-based English course passing rates when DE reform took place in 2014. However, colleges experienced different change patterns in the years following DE reform. Specifically, colleges located in rural areas and with more White students experienced relatively lower college-level English passing rates in the post-policy period than their counterparts. Different colleges had slight differences in the trajectory of college-level math passing rates by cohort after SB 1720 in 2014, but institutional characteristics in this study did not adequately capture inter-institutional differences.

Equity or Disparity: Do Performance Funding Policies Disadvantage 2-Year Minority-Serving Institutions?

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 288-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Y. Li ◽  
Denisa Gándara ◽  
Amanda Assalone
Keyword(s):  
Developmental Education ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Underrepresented Students ◽  
Performance Funding ◽  
State Funding ◽  
Retention Rates ◽  
Gateway Courses ◽  
Funding Policies ◽  
Funding Formulas ◽  
Minority Serving Institutions

Objective: We investigate whether performance funding—an increasingly prevalent state policy that allocates appropriations based on outcomes that prioritize retention and completion—places minority-serving institutions (MSIs) at a financial disadvantage due to these institutions serving a greater proportion of historically underrepresented students. Method: Using data from 2004-05 to 2014-15 within Texas and Washington, we compare state funding allocations to 2-year institutions designated as MSIs versus non-MSIs, before and after performance funding policies are implemented. We additionally compare funding allocations for each performance metric. Results: On average, MSIs in Texas and Washington are allocated the same or less in per-student state funding after performance funding compared to non-MSIs. MSIs in Texas are advantaged in performance metrics for transfers and for gateway courses in math (credit-bearing courses that serve as a “gateway” to continued study), and MSIs in Washington are advantaged in developmental education courses. However, MSIs are typically disadvantaged in metrics for degree completions. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that MSIs in Texas and Washington are not financially disadvantaged due to performance funding because the funding formulas in both states incentivize milestones in addition to outputs. We recommend that policy makers consider incorporating performance metrics for developmental education and gateway courses in addition to retention rates and degree completions, and tailor metrics to the student population of institutions to mitigate the potentially inequitable funding consequences of performance funding policies.

scholarly journals Effects of an attachment-based intervention on the cortisol production of infants and toddlers in foster care

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 845-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Dozier ◽  
Elizabeth Peloso ◽  
Erin Lewis ◽  
Jean-Philippe Laurenceau ◽  
Seymour Levine
Keyword(s):  
Foster Care ◽  
Developmental Education ◽  
Cognitive Skills ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Strange Situation ◽  
Initial Values ◽  
Children In Foster Care ◽  
Control Intervention ◽  
And Behavior

AbstractStudies with nonhuman primates and rodents, as well as with human children, have suggested that early separations from caregivers are often associated with changes in the functioning of the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis. On the basis of these findings, we designed a relational intervention that was intended to normalize HPA functioning among children in foster care. This paper presents findings from a randomized clinical trial that assessed the effectiveness of a relational intervention (Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up [ABC]) with regard to HPA functioning. The ABC intervention was intended to enhance children's ability to regulate physiology and behavior. The control intervention (Developmental Education for Families) was intended to enhance children's cognitive skills. A comparison group of children who had never been in foster care was also included. Children's cortisol production was assessed upon arrival at the lab, and 15 and 30 min following the Strange Situation. Random effects analyses of variance were performed to assess differences in initial values and change between children in the two intervention groups. Children in the ABC intervention and comparison group children showed lower initial values of cortisol than children in the treatment control group, considering arrival at lab as initial values (p < .05). Groups did not differ significantly in change over time. These results suggest that the ABC intervention is effective in helping children regulate biology in ways more characteristic of children who have not experienced early adversity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document