THE FORTESCUE FIELD - NEW OIL IN THE GIPPSLAND BASIN

1980 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
R.C.N. Thornton ◽  
B.J. Burns ◽  
A.K. Khurana ◽  
A.J. Rigg

The Fortescue-1 well drilled in the Gippsland Basin in June 1978 was a dry hole. However, results of detailed stratigraphic analysis together with seismic data provided sufficient information to predict the possible occurrence of a stratigraphic trap on the flank of the giant Halibut structure.Three months later the West Halibut-1 well encountered oil in the Latrobe Group 16 m below that depth carried as the original oil-water contact for the Halibut field. Following wireline testing in both the water and oil-bearing sandstone units, two separate pressure systems were recognised in the well. Three additional wells, Fortescue-2, 3 and 4, were drilled to define further the limits of the field, the complex stratigraphy and the hydrocarbon contacts.Integration of detailed well log correlations, stratigraphic interpretations and seismic data indicated that the Fortescue reservoirs were a discrete set of units stratigraphically younger and separated from those of Halibut and Cobia Fields. Analysis of pressures confirmed the presence of two separate pressure systems, proving none of the Fortescue reservoirs were being produced from the Halibut platform. Geochemical analysis of oils from both accumulations supported the above results, with indications that no mixing of oils had occurred.Because the Fortescue Field is interpreted as a hydrocarbon accumulation which is completely separated from both Halibut and Cobia Fields, and was not discovered prior to September 17, 1975, it qualified as "new oil" under the Federal Government's existing crude oil pricing policy. In late 1979, the Federal Government notified Esso/BHP that oil produced from the Fortescue Field would be classified as “new oil”.

1978 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
R. B. Mariow

The Golden Beach closed anticlinal structure lies five kilometres offshore in the Gippsland Basin. Golden Beach 1A was drilled in 1967 near the crest of the structure and intersected a gas column of 19 m (63 feet) at the top of the Latrobe Group (Late Eocene) where most of the hydrocarbon accumulations in the Gippsland Basin have been found. The gas-water contact lies at a depth of 652 m (2139 feet) below sea level.On seismic data recorded over the structure, a high amplitude flat-lying event was interpreted as a bright 'flat spot' at the gas-water contact. Reprocessing of the seismic data enhanced the bright spot effect and enabled the areal extent of the gas zone to be mapped. The presence of the gas also leads to a polarity reversal of the top of the Latrobe Group seismic reflector over the gas accumulation.Seismic data from other structures containing hydrocarbons in the Gippsland Basin support the concept that bright spots and flat spots are more likely to be associated with gas than with oil accumulations, and that the observed bright spot effect decreases with increasing depth.


1985 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Luiz Romanelli Rosa ◽  
Luis Ramos Arso ◽  
Ronaldo Jaegher

1993 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
Peter A. Arditto

Structural traps at the top 'Barrow Group' are the most successful oil exploration targets in the Barrow/Exmouth Sub-basins. However, a reinterpretation of recent exploration activities undertaken by BHP Petroleum Pty Ltd, combined with regional investigations on the Exmouth Plateau, has cast doubt on the validity of accepted stratigraphic nomenclature for the Neocomian succession. A more geologically rational subdivision of the upper part of the Neocomian succession into two discrete sequence stratigraphic units is proposed.Key seismic data from the Exmouth Plateau, tied into wells with good age control, have enabled precise recognition of the Intra-Valanginian Unconformity within the currently-defined Barrow Group. The Barrow Group (sensu stricto) is redefined in this paper as the Barrow Megasequence (restricted to a Berriasian age succession), comprising a rapid progradational phase, which was abruptly terminated by the Intra-Valanginian event.Local erosion of the Barrow Megasequence along the Novara Arch through an Early Valanginian uplift, during the ensuing Valanginian regional transgression, contributed to the development of a parasitic clastic wedge, previously referred to as the Upper Barrow Delta on the Exmouth Plateau and here named the Zeepaard Sequence, with a nominated section in Zeepaard-1. The Zeepaard sequence is terminated by a Top Valanginian unconformity, upon which a final deltaic clastic pulse was deposited as the Birdrong Sequence. Each successive clastic wedge had a more limited development, with the basinward progradation terminating well short of the underlying stratigraphic unit. The Birdrong Sequence was terminated by an Intra-Hauterivian unconformity upon which the highly glauconitic, thin, Mardie Greensand Member of the Muderong Sequence was developed.The Zeepaard Sequence and overlying Birdrong Sequence can be characterised using both seismic and well log character. Well data in particular has enabled detailed stratigraphic mapping of the Birdrong Sequence which is thin and generally not seismically resolvable across the Barrow Sub-basin. This paper presents a detailed sequence stratigraphic analysis of the Birdrong Sequence using well log data.


Geophysics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 836-844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Landrø

Explicit expressions for computing saturation‐ and pressure‐related changes from time‐lapse seismic data have been derived and tested on a real time‐lapse seismic data set. Necessary input is near‐and far‐offset stacks for the baseline seismic survey and the repeat survey. The method has been tested successfully in a segment where pressure measurements in two wells verify a pore‐pressure increase of 5 to 6 MPa between the baseline survey and the monitor survey. Estimated pressure changes using the proposed relationships fit very well with observations. Between the baseline and monitor seismic surveys, 27% of the estimated recoverable hydrocarbon reserves were produced from this segment. The estimated saturation changes also agree well with observed changes, apart from some areas in the water zone that are mapped as being exposed to saturation changes (which is unlikely). Saturation changes in other segments close to the original oil‐water contact and the top reservoir interface are also estimated and confirmed by observations in various wells.


Minerals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 293
Author(s):  
Wei Tian ◽  
Xiaomin Li ◽  
Lei Wang

Disparities between fold amplitude (A) and intrusion thickness (Hsill) are critical in identifying elastic or inelastic deformation in a forced fold. However, accurate measurements of these two parameters are challenging because of the limit in separability and detectability of the seismic data. We combined wireline data and 3-D seismic data from the TZ-47 exploring area in the Tarim Basin, Northwest China, to accurately constrain the fold amplitude and total thickness of sills that induced roof uplift in the terrain. Results from the measurement show that the forced fold amplitude is 155.0 m. After decompaction, the original forced fold amplitude in the area penetrated by the well T47 ranged from 159.9 to 225.8 m, which overlaps the total thickness of the stack of sills recovered by seismic method (171.4 m) and well log method (181.0 m). Therefore, the fold amplitude at T47 area is likely to be elastic. In contrast, the outer area of the TZ-47 forced fold is characterized by shear-style deformation, indicating inelastic deformation at the marginal area. It is suggested that interbedded limestone layers would play an important role in strengthening the roof layers, preventing inelastic deformation during the emplacement of intrusive magma.


Polymers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hajo Yagoub ◽  
Liping Zhu ◽  
Mahmoud H. M. A. Shibraen ◽  
Ali A. Altam ◽  
Dafaalla M. D. Babiker ◽  
...  

The complex aerogel generated from nano-polysaccharides, chitin nanocrystals (ChiNC) and TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers (TCNF), and its derivative cationic guar gum (CGG) is successfully prepared via a facile freeze-drying method with glutaraldehyde (GA) as cross-linkers. The complexation of ChiNC, TCNF, and CGG is shown to be helpful in creating a porous structure in the three-dimensional aerogel, which creates within the aerogel with large pore volume and excellent compressive properties. The ChiNC/TCNF/CGG aerogel is then modified with methyltrichlorosilane (MTCS) to obtain superhydrophobicity/superoleophilicity and used for oil–water separation. The successful modification is demonstrated through FTIR, XPS, and surface wettability studies. A water contact angle of 155° on the aerogel surface and 150° on the surface of the inside part of aerogel are obtained for the MTCS-modified ChiNC/TCNF/CGG aerogel, resulting in its effective absorption of corn oil and organic solvents (toluene, n-hexane, and trichloromethane) from both beneath and at the surface of water with excellent absorption capacity (i.e., 21.9 g/g for trichloromethane). More importantly, the modified aerogel can be used to continuously separate oil from water with the assistance of a vacuum setup and maintains a high absorption capacity after being used for 10 cycles. The as-prepared superhydrophobic/superoleophilic ChiNC/TCNF/CGG aerogel can be used as a promising absorbent material for the removal of oil from aqueous media.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhongping Qian ◽  
Xiang‐Yang Li ◽  
Mark Chapman ◽  
Yonggang Zhang ◽  
Yanguang Wang

2000 ◽  
Vol 3 (05) ◽  
pp. 401-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Nishikiori ◽  
Y. Hayashida

Summary This paper describes the multidisciplinary approach taken to investigate and model complex water influx into a water-driven sandstone reservoir, taking into account vertical water flux from the lower sand as a suspected supplemental source. The Khafji oil field is located offshore in the Arabian Gulf. Two Middle Cretaceous sandstone reservoirs are investigated to understand water movement during production. Both reservoirs are supported by a huge aquifer and had the same original oil-water contact. The reservoirs are separated by a thick and continuous shale so that the upper sand is categorized as edge water drive and the lower sand as bottomwater drive. Water production was observed at the central up structure wells of the upper sand much earlier than expected. This makes the modeling of water influx complicated because it is difficult to explain this phenomenon only by edge water influx. In this study, a technical study was performed to investigate water influx into the upper sand. A comprehensive review of pressure and production history indicated anomalous higher-pressure areas in the upper sand. Moreover, anomalous temperature profiles were observed in some wells in the same area. At the same time, watered zones were trailed through thermal-neutron decay time(TDT) where a thick water column was observed in the central area of the reservoir. In addition, a three-dimensional (3D) seismic survey has been conducted recently, revealing faults passing through the two reservoirs. Therefore, as a result of data review and subsequent investigation, conductive faults from the lower sand were suspected as supplemental fluid conduits. A pressure transient test was then designed and implemented, which suggested possible leakage from the nearby fault. Interference of the two reservoirs and an estimate of supplemental volume of water influx was made by material balance. Finally, an improved full-scale numerical reservoir model was constructed to model complex water movement, which includes suspected supplemental water from the lower sand. Employment of two kinds of water influx—one a conventional edge water and another a supplemental water invasion from the aquifer of the lowers and through conductive faults—achieved a water breakthrough match. Introduction The Khafji oil field is located in the Arabian Gulf about 40 km offshore Al-Khafji as shown by Fig. 1. The length and width of the field are about 20 and 8 km, respectively. The upper sandstone reservoir, the subject of this study, lies at a depth of about 5,000 ft subsea and was discovered in1960. The average thickness of the reservoir is about 190 ft. The reservoir is of Middle Cretaceous geologic age. Underlying the upper sandstone reservoir is another sandstone reservoir at a depth of about 5,400 ft. It has an average gross thickness of about 650 ft and is separated from the upper sand by a thick shale bed of about 200 ft. Both reservoirs had the same original oil-water contact level as shown by the subsurface reservoir profile in Fig. 2. Both sandstone reservoirs are categorized as strong waterdrive that can maintain reservoir pressure well above the bubblepoint. On the other hand, water production cannot be avoided because of an unfavorable water-to-oil mobility ratio of 2 to 4 and high formation permeability in conjunction with a strong waterdrive mechanism. In a typical edge water drive reservoir, water production normally begins from the peripheral wells located near the oil-water contact and water encroaches as oil production proceeds. However, some production wells located in the central up structure area of the upper sand started to produce formation water before the wells located in the flank area near the water level. In 1996, we started an integrated geological and reservoir study to maximize oil recovery, to enhance reservoir management, and to optimize the production scheme for both sandstone reservoirs. This paper describes a part of the integrated study, which focused on the modeling of water movement in the upper sand. The contents of the study described in this paper are outlined as:diagnosis and description of the reservoir by fully utilizing available data, which include comprehensive review of production history, TDT logs, formation temperatures, pressures, and 3D seismic; introduction of fluid conductive faults as a suspected supplemental water source in the central upstructure area; design and implementation of a pressure transient test to investigate communication between the reservoirs and conductivity of faults; running of material balance for the two reservoirs simultaneously to assess their interference; and construction of an improved full-scale reservoir simulation model and precise modeling of complex water movement. Brief Geological Description of the Upper Sand The structure of the upper sand is anticline with the major axis running northeast to southwest. The structure dip is gentle (Fig. 3) at about3° on the northwestern flank and 2° on the southeastern flank. The upper sand is composed mainly of sandstone-dominated sandstone and shale sequences. It is interpreted that the depositional environment is complex, consisting of shoreface and tide-influenced fluvial channels.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document