THE KINGFISH FIELD—OFFSHORE GIPPSLAND BASIN

1973 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Jorg Bein ◽  
Brian R. Griffith ◽  
Andrew K. Svalbe

The Kingfish field, currently Australia's largest producing oil field, lies 48 miles offshore southeastern Victoria in 250 ft of water. The field occurs within a large, essentially, east-west trending topographic high on the Latrobe unconformity surface sealed by fine grained clastics of the Upper Eocene Gurnard and Oligocene Lakes Entrance Formations. The reservoir itself is formed by Lower Eocene sediments of interdeltaic origin.The discovery well, Kingfish 1, was spudded on 6 April 1967. This well indicated the severity of a suspected seismic velocity gradient, a function of high velocity channel deposits in Miocene sediments overlying the crest of the Latrobe unconformity surface. Additional seismic coverage and two outpost wells provided sufficient structural and stratigraphic control to define a commercial oil field having a maximum of 270 ft of vertical relief over an area of some 28 sq mi at the oil-water contact of 7,566 ft subsea.Following completion of the 42 well development drilling program for the A and B platforms the Kingfish oil field was put on stream on 21 April 1971. Proved and probable reserves have been initially estimated at 1,060 MM STB. The field has flowed oil at rates in excess of 180,000 STB/D for a cumulative production to the end of 1972 of 83 MM STB.

1971 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 85 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. R. Griffith ◽  
E. A. Hodgson

The offshore Gippsland Basin, underlies the continental shelf and slope between eastern Victoria and Tasmania.The basin is filled with up to 25,000' of sediment, varying in age from Lower Cretaceous to Recent. The Lower Cretaceous section is represented by at least 10,000' of nonmarine greywackes of the Strzelecki Group. The overlying sediments of Upper Cretaceous to Eocene age comprise the interbedded sandstones, siltstones, shales and coals of the Latrobe Group, with a cumulative thickness of about 15,000'. Offshore, the Latrobe Group is overlain unconformably by up to 1500' of calcareous mudstones of the Lakes Entrance Formation and up to 5000' of Gippsland Limestone carbonates. Pliocene to Recent carbonates, reaching a maximum thickness of about 1000', complete the sedimentary section of the basin.Australia's first commercial offshore field, the Barracouta oil and gas field, was discovered in the Gippsland Basin in February 1965. Further exploratory drilling over the following two and a half years led to the discovery of the Marlin gas field and the Kingfish and Halibut oil fields.The principal hydrocarbon accumulations are reservoired by sediments of the Latrobe Group within closed structural highs on the Latrobe unconformity surface. Seal is provided by the mudstones and marls of the Lakes Entrance Formation and Gippsland Limestone.A field development programme was initiated immediately after Barracouta had been confirmed as a commercial gas reservoir. By the end of 1967, the Barracouta 'A' platform had been erected. Construction and positioning of the Marlin, Halibut and the two Kingfish platforms followed.To date development drilling has been completed on the Barracouta and Halibut fields, while development of the Marlin field has been temporarily suspended following completion of four wells. Development of the Kingfish oil field which commenced in March 1970, is still in a relatively early stage.The Barracouta field has been producing gas and oil since March and October, 1969 respectively. The Marlin gas field was put on stream in November, 1969 and the Halibut oil field in March 1970. As yet no wells drilled in the Kingfish oil field have been completed for production.The four fields provide a major source of hydrocarbons for the Australian market. By the end of September, 1970 cumulative production of sales quality gas from the Barracouta and Marlin fields was almost 23 BCF. Cumulative production of stabilised oil from Barracouta was 2 million barrels and over 26 million barrels from Halibut.


2000 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 293 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.R. Holdgate ◽  
M.W. Wallace ◽  
J. Daniels S.J. Gallagher ◽  
J.B. Keene ◽  
A.J. Smith

Seaspray Group carbonate sediments of Oligocene to Recent age overlie the main hydrocarbon producing Upper Cretaceous to Eocene Latrobe Group in the offshore Gippsland Basin. Their sonic complexity creates major difficulties for hydrocarbon exploration. Carbonate facies are divisible into three subgroups based on seismic character, sonic logs, velocity profiles, carbonate content, petrologic character and age. The oldest unit is the Angler Subgroup that consists of carbonate pelagic marls (CaC03 70%) with interbedded clastic-rich units.Zones of high velocity (>3,000m/s) are restricted to the deeply buried parts of the Albacore Subgroup, at TWT's greater than 0.8 seconds. The characteristics of this high velocity facies are: a composition of fine grained bioclast-rich packstones and wackestones with less than 10% silt sized quartz; the carbonate content exceeds 60%; the intervals are prone to cementation and are stylolitised; they are diachronous (i.e. cut across seismic boundaries); velocities progressively increase with depth; highest velocities occur where the unit is thickest towards the centre of the basin; velocity increases laterally with steepness of angle on downlap surfaces due to coarser grain sizes and inferred greater initial porosity; and velocities increase with stratigraphic age in the Albacore Subgroup. Regardless of burial depth the Angler and Hapuku Subgroups contain no significantly high velocity zones.An empirical relationship derived from this data set provides a basis for re-interpreting average velocity to the top of the Latrobe Group in areas underlying high velocity canyon-fill sediments.


2000 ◽  
Vol 3 (05) ◽  
pp. 401-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Nishikiori ◽  
Y. Hayashida

Summary This paper describes the multidisciplinary approach taken to investigate and model complex water influx into a water-driven sandstone reservoir, taking into account vertical water flux from the lower sand as a suspected supplemental source. The Khafji oil field is located offshore in the Arabian Gulf. Two Middle Cretaceous sandstone reservoirs are investigated to understand water movement during production. Both reservoirs are supported by a huge aquifer and had the same original oil-water contact. The reservoirs are separated by a thick and continuous shale so that the upper sand is categorized as edge water drive and the lower sand as bottomwater drive. Water production was observed at the central up structure wells of the upper sand much earlier than expected. This makes the modeling of water influx complicated because it is difficult to explain this phenomenon only by edge water influx. In this study, a technical study was performed to investigate water influx into the upper sand. A comprehensive review of pressure and production history indicated anomalous higher-pressure areas in the upper sand. Moreover, anomalous temperature profiles were observed in some wells in the same area. At the same time, watered zones were trailed through thermal-neutron decay time(TDT) where a thick water column was observed in the central area of the reservoir. In addition, a three-dimensional (3D) seismic survey has been conducted recently, revealing faults passing through the two reservoirs. Therefore, as a result of data review and subsequent investigation, conductive faults from the lower sand were suspected as supplemental fluid conduits. A pressure transient test was then designed and implemented, which suggested possible leakage from the nearby fault. Interference of the two reservoirs and an estimate of supplemental volume of water influx was made by material balance. Finally, an improved full-scale numerical reservoir model was constructed to model complex water movement, which includes suspected supplemental water from the lower sand. Employment of two kinds of water influx—one a conventional edge water and another a supplemental water invasion from the aquifer of the lowers and through conductive faults—achieved a water breakthrough match. Introduction The Khafji oil field is located in the Arabian Gulf about 40 km offshore Al-Khafji as shown by Fig. 1. The length and width of the field are about 20 and 8 km, respectively. The upper sandstone reservoir, the subject of this study, lies at a depth of about 5,000 ft subsea and was discovered in1960. The average thickness of the reservoir is about 190 ft. The reservoir is of Middle Cretaceous geologic age. Underlying the upper sandstone reservoir is another sandstone reservoir at a depth of about 5,400 ft. It has an average gross thickness of about 650 ft and is separated from the upper sand by a thick shale bed of about 200 ft. Both reservoirs had the same original oil-water contact level as shown by the subsurface reservoir profile in Fig. 2. Both sandstone reservoirs are categorized as strong waterdrive that can maintain reservoir pressure well above the bubblepoint. On the other hand, water production cannot be avoided because of an unfavorable water-to-oil mobility ratio of 2 to 4 and high formation permeability in conjunction with a strong waterdrive mechanism. In a typical edge water drive reservoir, water production normally begins from the peripheral wells located near the oil-water contact and water encroaches as oil production proceeds. However, some production wells located in the central up structure area of the upper sand started to produce formation water before the wells located in the flank area near the water level. In 1996, we started an integrated geological and reservoir study to maximize oil recovery, to enhance reservoir management, and to optimize the production scheme for both sandstone reservoirs. This paper describes a part of the integrated study, which focused on the modeling of water movement in the upper sand. The contents of the study described in this paper are outlined as:diagnosis and description of the reservoir by fully utilizing available data, which include comprehensive review of production history, TDT logs, formation temperatures, pressures, and 3D seismic; introduction of fluid conductive faults as a suspected supplemental water source in the central upstructure area; design and implementation of a pressure transient test to investigate communication between the reservoirs and conductivity of faults; running of material balance for the two reservoirs simultaneously to assess their interference; and construction of an improved full-scale reservoir simulation model and precise modeling of complex water movement. Brief Geological Description of the Upper Sand The structure of the upper sand is anticline with the major axis running northeast to southwest. The structure dip is gentle (Fig. 3) at about3° on the northwestern flank and 2° on the southeastern flank. The upper sand is composed mainly of sandstone-dominated sandstone and shale sequences. It is interpreted that the depositional environment is complex, consisting of shoreface and tide-influenced fluvial channels.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yousif M. Makeen ◽  
Xuanlong Shan ◽  
Mutari Lawal ◽  
Habeeb A. Ayinla ◽  
Siyuan Su ◽  
...  

AbstractThe Abu Gabra and Bentiu formations are widely distributed within the interior Muglad Basin. Recently, much attention has been paid to study, evaluate and characterize the Abu Gabra Formation as a proven reservoir in Muglad Basin. However, few studies have been documented on the Bentiu Formation which is the main oil/gas reservoir within the basin. Therefore, 33 core samples of the Great Moga and Keyi oilfields (NE Muglad Basin) were selected to characterize the Bentiu Formation reservoir using sedimentological and petrophysical analyses. The aim of the study is to de-risk exploration activities and improve success rate. Compositional and textural analyses revealed two main facies groups: coarse to-medium grained sandstone (braided channel deposits) and fine grained sandstone (floodplain and crevasse splay channel deposits). The coarse to-medium grained sandstone has porosity and permeability values within the range of 19.6% to 32.0% and 1825.6 mD to 8358.0 mD respectively. On the other hand, the fine grained clay-rich facies displays poor reservoir quality as indicated by porosity and permeability ranging from 1.0 to 6.0% and 2.5 to 10.0 mD respectively. A number of varied processes were identified controlling the reservoir quality of the studies samples. Porosity and permeability were enhanced by the dissolution of feldspars and micas, while presence of detrital clays, kaolinite precipitation, iron oxides precipitation, siderite, quartz overgrowths and pyrite cement played negative role on the reservoir quality. Intensity of the observed quartz overgrowth increases with burial depth. At great depths, a variability in grain contact types are recorded suggesting conditions of moderate to-high compactions. Furthermore, scanning electron microscopy revealed presence of micropores which have the tendency of affecting the fluid flow properties in the Bentiu Formation sandstone. These evidences indicate that the Bentiu Formation petroleum reservoir quality is primarily inhibited by grain size, total clay content, compaction and cementation. Thus, special attention should be paid to these inhibiting factors to reduce risk in petroleum exploration within the area.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-113
Author(s):  
Wisam I. Al-Rubaye ◽  
Dhiaa S. Ghanem ◽  
Hussein Mohammed Kh ◽  
Hayder Abdulzahra ◽  
Ali M. Saleem ◽  
...  

In petroleum industry, an accurate description and estimation of the Oil-Water Contact(OWC) is very important in quantifying the resources (i.e. original oil in place (OIIP)), andoptimizing production techniques, rates and overall management of the reservoir. Thus,OWC accurate estimation is crucial step for optimum reservoir characterization andexploration. This paper presents a comparison of three different methods (i.e. open holewell logging, MDT test and capillary pressure drainage data) to determine the oil watercontact of a carbonate reservoir (Main Mishrif) in an Iraqi oil field "BG”. A total of threewells from "BG" oil field were evaluated by using interactive petrophysics software "IPv3.6". The results show that using the well logging interpretations leads to predict OWCdepth of -3881 mssl. However, it shows variance in the estimated depth (WELL X; -3939,WELL Y; -3844, WELL Z; -3860) mssl, which is considered as an acceptable variationrange due to the fact that OWC height level in reality is not constant and its elevation isusually changed laterally due to the complicated heterogeneity nature of the reservoirs.Furthermore, the results indicate that the MDT test can predict a depth of OWC at -3889mssl, while the capillary drainage data results in a OWC depth of -3879 mssl. The properMDT data and SCAL data are necessary to reduce the uncertainty in the estimationprocess. Accordingly, the best approach for estimating OWC is the combination of MDTand capillary pressure due to the field data obtained are more reliable than open hole welllogs with many measurement uncertainties due to the fact of frequent borehole conditions.


1978 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
R. B. Mariow

The Golden Beach closed anticlinal structure lies five kilometres offshore in the Gippsland Basin. Golden Beach 1A was drilled in 1967 near the crest of the structure and intersected a gas column of 19 m (63 feet) at the top of the Latrobe Group (Late Eocene) where most of the hydrocarbon accumulations in the Gippsland Basin have been found. The gas-water contact lies at a depth of 652 m (2139 feet) below sea level.On seismic data recorded over the structure, a high amplitude flat-lying event was interpreted as a bright 'flat spot' at the gas-water contact. Reprocessing of the seismic data enhanced the bright spot effect and enabled the areal extent of the gas zone to be mapped. The presence of the gas also leads to a polarity reversal of the top of the Latrobe Group seismic reflector over the gas accumulation.Seismic data from other structures containing hydrocarbons in the Gippsland Basin support the concept that bright spots and flat spots are more likely to be associated with gas than with oil accumulations, and that the observed bright spot effect decreases with increasing depth.


1980 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
R.C.N. Thornton ◽  
B.J. Burns ◽  
A.K. Khurana ◽  
A.J. Rigg

The Fortescue-1 well drilled in the Gippsland Basin in June 1978 was a dry hole. However, results of detailed stratigraphic analysis together with seismic data provided sufficient information to predict the possible occurrence of a stratigraphic trap on the flank of the giant Halibut structure.Three months later the West Halibut-1 well encountered oil in the Latrobe Group 16 m below that depth carried as the original oil-water contact for the Halibut field. Following wireline testing in both the water and oil-bearing sandstone units, two separate pressure systems were recognised in the well. Three additional wells, Fortescue-2, 3 and 4, were drilled to define further the limits of the field, the complex stratigraphy and the hydrocarbon contacts.Integration of detailed well log correlations, stratigraphic interpretations and seismic data indicated that the Fortescue reservoirs were a discrete set of units stratigraphically younger and separated from those of Halibut and Cobia Fields. Analysis of pressures confirmed the presence of two separate pressure systems, proving none of the Fortescue reservoirs were being produced from the Halibut platform. Geochemical analysis of oils from both accumulations supported the above results, with indications that no mixing of oils had occurred.Because the Fortescue Field is interpreted as a hydrocarbon accumulation which is completely separated from both Halibut and Cobia Fields, and was not discovered prior to September 17, 1975, it qualified as "new oil" under the Federal Government's existing crude oil pricing policy. In late 1979, the Federal Government notified Esso/BHP that oil produced from the Fortescue Field would be classified as “new oil”.


2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 672
Author(s):  
Daniel León ◽  
John Scott ◽  
Steven Saul ◽  
Lina Hartanto ◽  
Shannon Gardner ◽  
...  

After successful design and implementation phases that included both subsurface and facilities components, an EOR polymer injection pilot has been operational for two years in Australia's largest onshore oil field at Barrow Island (816 MMstb OOIP). The pilot's main objective was to identify a suitable EOR technology for the complex, highly heterogeneous, very fine-grained, bioturbated argillaceous sandstone—high in glauconite, high porosity (∼23 %), low permeability (∼5 mD, with 50+ mD streaks)—reservoir that will ultimately increase the recovery of commercial resources past the estimated ultimate recovery factor with waterflooding (∼42 %). This was achieved using the in-depth flow diversion (IFD) methodology to access new unswept oil zones—both vertically and horizontally—by inducing growth in the fracture network. During the pilot operating phase, the main focus has been on surveillance and monitoring activities to assess the effectiveness of the process, including: injection pressure at the wellheads—indicating any increase in resistance to flow; pressure fall off tests at the injectors—to determine fracture growth, if any sampling and lab analysis at the producers—to identify polymer breakthrough; frequent production tests—quantifying reduction in water cut and oil production uplift; and, pressure build up surveys at the producers. These activities provided input data to the fit for purpose simulation model built in Reveal incorporating fractures and polymer as a fourth phase. With more than 96 % compliance to the surveillance plan, this paper will present the present findings and evaluation of the results, which may lead to the continuation of the pilot in other patterns of the reservoir and, possibly, to further expansion in the field.


1976 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 73 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. Partridge

In the non-marine to marginal marine environments of the Latrobe Group, distinct sedimentary sequences are recognised on seismic records and these sequences are often expressed in wells by palynological zones, changes in E-log character and lithology.The succession of sequences represents variations in sea level, many of which are interpreted aseustatic. Eustatic falls are represented by unconformities and channel formation along the seaward margin and by hiatuses (frequently with dolomite cementation of underlying sands) landward in deltaic and non-marine sections. Eustatic rises are represented by dinoflagellate ingressions over truncated surfaces at sequence boundaries, followed by outbuilding of deltaic environments at the stillstand towards the end of each cycle.During the Paleocene and Eocene very little sediment was deposited beyond the limits of the marginal marine environments except within channels where the Flounder and Turrum Formations are found. In this time interval they was an overall landward encroachment of successive sequences reflecting an overall sea level rise. The interaction of rising sea level and limited deposition beyond the marginal marine edge meant that successive sequences became more restricted seaward such that within the marine environment the area of non-deposition increased. The surface thus defined, modified locally by channel erosion, constitutes the unconformity at the top of the Latrobe Group. This unconformity surface was preserved when deposition of fine-grained open marine sediments of the Lakes Entrance Formation commenced in the Oligocene.In the Tasman Sea a succession of terrigenous silts and clays present in the Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) Site 283 can be correlated with periods when fine-grained sediments bypassed the Gippsland shelf. The stratigraphy of this site can be interpreted as a record of availability of sediment from the southeastern Australian continental shelf. The times of commencement and termination of stratigraphic units and disconformities at Site 283 correlate with timing of eustatic cycles. Thus the stratigraphy of Site 283 is a record, as is the Latrobe Group, of how eustacy interacts with basin morphology to modify distribution of sediments.


2005 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 581 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Bernecker ◽  
A.D. Partridge

In the Gippsland Basin, the seaward extent of paralic coal occurrences can be mapped in successive time slices through the Paleocene and Eocene to provide a series of straight to gently arcuate surrogate palaeoshorelines within the petroliferous Latrobe Group. Palaeogeographic reconstructions that incorporate this information provide a unique perspective on the changes affecting a siliciclastic depositional system on a passive continental margin where basin development has been primarily controlled by thermal sag. In contrast, the absence of calcareous marine fossils and lack of extensive, widespread and thick fine-grained sediments on the marine shelf and continental slope, beyond the seaward limits of coal accumulation, have contributed to the false impression that the Latrobe Group accumulated in a largely non-marine basin. Based on the proposed model for palaeoshoreline delineation, seismic data, sequence analysis, petrography and palynology can be integrated to subdivide the main depositional environments into distinct facies associations that can be used to predict the distribution of petroleum systems elements in the basin. The application of such palaeogeographic models to the older section of the Latrobe Group can improve the identification of these petroleum systems elements in as yet unexplored parts of the Gippsland Basin. Given the recent attention paid to the basin as a CO2 storage province, palaeogeographic interpretations may be able to assist with the selection of appropriate injection sites.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document