Detection and profiling of carbon via the [sup 13]C(P,γ)[sup 14]N resonant reaction

Author(s):  
Hassaram Bakhru ◽  
Arthur W. Haberl ◽  
W. G. Skala
Keyword(s):  
2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 1173-1175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shen Yi-Fan ◽  
Dai Kang ◽  
Mu Bao-Xia ◽  
Wang Shu-Ying ◽  
Cui Xiu-Hua

2009 ◽  
Vol 708 (1) ◽  
pp. 796-811 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. La Cognata ◽  
C. Spitaleri ◽  
A. Mukhamedzhanov ◽  
A. Banu ◽  
S. Cherubini ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
S. Kossionides ◽  
G. Kaliambakos ◽  
R. Vlastou ◽  
C. T. Papadopoulos

The concentration and depth profile of Cu and S in patinna samples have been determined by using Nuclear Reaction Analysis (NRA) and Rutherford Backscattering Spectroscopy (RBS). For the NRA the differential cross section was mesaured for the 1327 keV 7-ray deexciting the third excited state to the ground state of 6 3Cu through the reaction 63Cu(p,p'7), as well as, for the 2230 keV γ-ray deexciting the first excited state to the ground state through the resonant reaction 32S(p,p'7). The mesaurements of both excitation functions were performed in the energy range 3.0 - 3.7 MeV in 20 keV steps and at an angle of 125°.


Author(s):  
A. Santamarina ◽  
N. Hfaiedh ◽  
R. Letellier ◽  
V. Marotte ◽  
S. Misu ◽  
...  

This paper summarizes the developments implemented in the new APOLLO2.8 neutronics tool to meet the required target accuracy in LWR applications, particularly void effects and pin-by-pin power map in BWRs. The Method Of Characteristics was developed to allow efficient LWR assembly calculations in 2D-exact heterogeneous geometry; resonant reaction calculation was improved by the optimized SHEM-281 group mesh, which avoids resonance self-shielding approximation below 23eV, and the new space-dependent method for resonant mixture that accounts for resonance overlapping. Furthermore, a new library CEA2005, processed from JEFF3.1 evaluations involving feedback from Critical Experiments and LWR P.I.E, is used. The specific “2005–2007 BWR Plan” settled to demonstrate the validation/qualification of this neutronics tool is described. Some results from the validation process are presented: the comparison of APOLLO2.8 results to reference Monte Carlo TRIPOLI4 results on specific BWR benchmarks emphasizes the ability of the deterministic tool to calculate BWR assembly multiplication factor within 200 pcm accuracy for void fraction varying from 0 to 100%. The qualification process against the BASALA mock-up experiment stresses APOLLO2.8/CEA2005 performances: pin-by-pin power is always predicted within 2% accuracy, reactivity worth of B4C or Hf cruciform control blade, as well as Gd pins, is predicted within 1.2% accuracy.


2015 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. 99-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Gerke ◽  
Hans–Werner Becker ◽  
Detlef Rogalla ◽  
Giso Hahn ◽  
Reinhart Job ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 529-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Ferro ◽  
A. Lavagno ◽  
P. Quarati

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document