Motor Impairment following Blockade of the Infraorbital Nerve: Implications for the Use of Anesthetization Techniques in Speech Research

1976 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
James H. Abbs ◽  
John W. Folkins ◽  
Murali Sivarajan

Infraorbital nerve blocks were performed bilaterally in three subjects as a partial test of the hypothesis that some portion of the motor innervation to die facial muscles is provided in the trigeminal nerve. To ascertain the influence of this anesthetic procedure, the magnitude and rate of upper lip displacement (for speech and nonspeech tasks), the magnitude and rate of upper lip depression force, and diadochokinetic rate were transduced and recorded, both pre- and postanesthesia. All measures, along with bilateral muscle action potentials from orbicularis oris superior obtained for all force and displacement tasks, were reduced in magnitude as a function of the anesthetic condition. These findings, along with results from previous speech anesthetic studies, were interpreted to suggest that anesthesia of the infraorbital nerve produces measurable, if not substantial motor weakness in the supraoral musculature. The implications for previous studies, where anesthesia techniques have been employed, are discussed.

2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 1232-1235 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.L. Morren ◽  
S. Walter ◽  
H. Lindehammar ◽  
O. Hallböök ◽  
R. Sjödahl

2009 ◽  
Vol 250 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Selvan ◽  
Srinivasa Babu ◽  
M J. Paul ◽  
Deepak Abraham ◽  
Prasanna Samuel ◽  
...  

1960 ◽  
Vol 106 (442) ◽  
pp. 281-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Martin

Any particular system which is being conditioned is likely to maintain a certain level of background activity throughout the experimental procedure; either of a discontinuous nature, as, for example, with eyeblink, heart rate and respiratory cycle, or continuously, as in the case of basal skin resistance and muscle tonus. This background activity or level of arousal does not remain constant but usually varies in time, presumably as a result of underlying neural excitation or inhibition. It may increase throughout an experiment if the subject becomes highly motivated, as with the gradients of muscle action potentials observed by Bartoshuk (1955), or decrease, if the subject becomes more relaxed and familiar with the set-up, as Duffy and Lacey (1946) found with level of skin conductance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document