Pluripotency transcription factors at the focus: the phase separation paradigm in stem cells

Author(s):  
Camila Oses ◽  
Martin Stortz ◽  
Paula Verneri ◽  
Alejandra Guberman ◽  
Valeria Levi

The transcription factors (TFs) OCT4, SOX2 and NANOG are key players of the gene regulatory network of pluripotent stem cells. Evidence accumulated in recent years shows that even small imbalances in the expression levels or relative concentrations of these TFs affect both, the maintenance of pluripotency and cell fate decisions. In addition, many components of the transcriptional machinery including RNA polymerases, cofactors and TFs such as those required for pluripotency, do not distribute homogeneously in the nucleus but concentrate in multiple foci influencing the delivery of these molecules to their DNA-targets. How cells control strict levels of available pluripotency TFs in this heterogeneous space and the biological role of these foci remain elusive. In recent years, a wealth of evidence led to propose that many of the nuclear compartments are formed through a liquid–liquid phase separation process. This new paradigm early penetrated the stem cells field since many key players of the pluripotency circuitry seem to phase-separate. Overall, the formation of liquid compartments may modulate the kinetics of biochemical reactions and consequently regulate many nuclear processes. Here, we review the state-of-the-art knowledge of compartmentalization in the cell nucleus and the relevance of this process for transcriptional regulation, particularly in pluripotent stem cells. We also highlight the recent advances and new ideas in the field showing how compartmentalization may affect pluripotency preservation and cell fate decisions.

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuyuki Ohbo ◽  
Shin-ichi Tomizawa

AbstractStem cells are identified classically by an in vivo transplantation assay plus additional characterization, such as marker analysis, linage-tracing and in vitro/ex vivo differentiation assays. Stem cell lines have been derived, in vitro, from adult tissues, the inner cell mass (ICM), epiblast, and male germ stem cells, providing intriguing insight into stem cell biology, plasticity, heterogeneity, metastable state, and the pivotal point at which stem cells irreversibly differentiate to non-stem cells. During the past decade, strategies for manipulating cell fate have revolutionized our understanding about the basic concept of cell differentiation: stem cell lines can be established by introducing transcription factors, as with the case for iPSCs, revealing some of the molecular interplay of key factors during the course of phenotypic changes. In addition to de-differentiation approaches for establishing stem cells, another method has been developed whereby induced expression of certain transcription factors and/or micro RNAs artificially converts differentiated cells from one committed lineage to another; notably, these cells need not transit through a stem/progenitor state. The molecular cues guiding such cell fate conversion and reprogramming remain largely unknown. As differentiation and de-differentiation are directly linked to epigenetic changes, we overview cell fate decisions, and associated gene and epigenetic regulations.


2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenzhi Chng ◽  
Adrian Teo ◽  
Roger A. Pedersen ◽  
Ludovic Vallier

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph Stadhouders ◽  
Enrique Vidal ◽  
François Serra ◽  
Bruno Di Stefano ◽  
François Le Dily ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTChromosomal architecture is known to influence gene expression, yet its role in controlling cell fate remains poorly understood. Reprogramming of somatic cells into pluripotent stem cells by the transcription factors (TFs) Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and Myc offers an opportunity to address this question but is severely limited by the low proportion of responding cells. We recently developed a highly efficient reprogramming protocol that synchronously converts somatic into pluripotent stem cells. Here, we employ this system to integrate time-resolved changes in genome topology with gene expression, TF binding and chromatin state dynamics. This revealed that TFs drive topological genome reorganization at multiple architectural levels, which often precedes changes in gene expression. Removal of locus-specific topological barriers can explain why pluripotency genes are activated sequentially, instead of simultaneously, during reprogramming. Taken together, our study implicates genome topology as an instructive force for implementing transcriptional programs and cell fate in mammals.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 906-918
Author(s):  
Hadi Rajabi ◽  
Somayeh Aslani ◽  
Alireza Abhari ◽  
Davoud Sanajou

Stem cells are undifferentiated cells and have a great potential in multilineage differentiation. These cells are classified into adult stem cells like Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) and Embryonic Stem Cells (ESCs). Stem cells also have potential therapeutic utility due to their pluripotency, self-renewal, and differentiation ability. These properties make them a suitable choice for regenerative medicine. Stem cells differentiation toward functional cells is governed by different signaling pathways and transcription factors. Recent studies have demonstrated the key role of microRNAs in the pathogenesis of various diseases, cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, aging, cell fate decisions. Several types of stem cells have different and unique miRNA expression profiles. Our review summarizes novel regulatory roles of miRNAs in the process of stem cell differentiation especially adult stem cells into a variety of functional cells through signaling pathways and transcription factors modulation. Understanding the mechanistic roles of miRNAs might be helpful in elaborating clinical therapies using stem cells and developing novel biomarkers for the early and effective diagnosis of pathologic conditions.


2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (22) ◽  
pp. 2687-2699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Essam M. Abdelalim ◽  
Mohamed M. Emara ◽  
Prasanna R. Kolatkar

eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Dong ◽  
Mariana Beltcheva ◽  
Paul Gontarz ◽  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Pooja Popli ◽  
...  

Naïve human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) provide a unique experimental platform of cell fate decisions during pre-implantation development, but their lineage potential remains incompletely characterized. As naïve hPSCs share transcriptional and epigenomic signatures with trophoblast cells, it has been proposed that the naïve state may have enhanced predisposition for differentiation along this extraembryonic lineage. Here we examined the trophoblast potential of isogenic naïve and primed hPSCs. We found that naïve hPSCs can directly give rise to human trophoblast stem cells (hTSCs) and undergo further differentiation into both extravillous and syncytiotrophoblast. In contrast, primed hPSCs do not support hTSC derivation, but give rise to non-self-renewing cytotrophoblasts in response to BMP4. Global transcriptome and chromatin accessibility analyses indicate that hTSCs derived from naïve hPSCs are similar to blastocyst-derived hTSCs and acquire features of post-implantation trophectoderm. The derivation of hTSCs from naïve hPSCs will enable elucidation of early mechanisms that govern normal human trophoblast development and associated pathologies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinchao Gu ◽  
Brett Cromer ◽  
Huseyin Sumer

: Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) are powerful tools for studying developmental biology and neuronal diseases. Conventional differentiation protocols require several intermediate states and different culture conditions, inefficiently generating mixed subtypes of neuronal cells with immature characteristics. Direct programming of PSCs by forced expression of neuronal transcription factors has shown rapid cell fate determination with high purity as it can bypass sequential developmental steps that traditional culture requires. In this review, we focus on neuronal differentiation from PSCs to specific subtypes by various transcription factors. Furthermore, the potential applications and limitations of this novel technology are discussed.


F1000Research ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anestis Tsakiridis ◽  
Valerie Wilson

Retrospective clonal analysis in the mouse has demonstrated that the posterior spinal cord neurectoderm and paraxial mesoderm share a common bipotent progenitor. These neuromesodermal progenitors (NMPs) are the source of new axial structures during embryonic rostrocaudal axis elongation and are marked by the simultaneous co-expression of the transcription factors T(Brachyury) (T(Bra)) and Sox2. NMP-like cells have recently been derived from pluripotent stem cells in vitro following combined stimulation of Wnt and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling. Under these conditions the majority of cultures consist of T(Bra)/Sox2 co-expressing cells after 48-72 hours of differentiation. Although the capacity of these cells to generate posterior neural and paraxial mesoderm derivatives has been demonstrated at the population level, it is unknown whether a single in vitro-derived NMP can give rise to both neural and mesodermal cells. Here we demonstrate that T(Bra) positive cells obtained from mouse epiblast stem cells (EpiSCs) after culture in NMP-inducing conditions can generate both neural and mesodermal clones. This finding suggests that, similar to their embryonic counterparts, in vitro-derived NMPs are truly bipotent and can thus be exploited as a model for studying the molecular basis of developmental cell fate decisions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (39) ◽  
pp. 13419-13431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xing Liu ◽  
Xu Liu ◽  
Haowei Wang ◽  
Zhen Dou ◽  
Ke Ruan ◽  
...  

Liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) of biomolecules drives the formation of subcellular compartments with distinct physicochemical properties. These compartments, free of lipid bilayers and therefore called membraneless organelles, include nucleoli, centrosomes, heterochromatin, and centromeres. These have emerged as a new paradigm to account for subcellular organization and cell fate decisions. Here we summarize recent studies linking LLPS to mitotic spindle, heterochromatin, and centromere assembly and their plasticity controls in the context of the cell division cycle, highlighting a functional role for phase behavior and material properties of proteins assembled onto heterochromatin, centromeres, and central spindles via LLPS. The techniques and tools for visualizing and harnessing membraneless organelle dynamics and plasticity in mitosis are also discussed, as is the potential for these discoveries to promote new research directions for investigating chromosome dynamics, plasticity, and interchromosome interactions in the decision-making process during mitosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document