The art and design of genetic screens: mammalian culture cells

2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Grimm
2002 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 356-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik M. Jorgensen ◽  
Susan E. Mango

2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 557-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin T. Kile ◽  
Douglas J. Hilton

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 192-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Héctor Candela ◽  
Sarah Hake

2003 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 419-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard A. Shuman ◽  
Thomas J. Silhavy

2001 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. 956-966 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Elizabeth Patton ◽  
Leonard I. Zon

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 554-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Boutros ◽  
Julie Ahringer

2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Pierce ◽  
Chunwei Wang ◽  
Matt Rebentisch ◽  
Mark Endo ◽  
Mark Stump ◽  
...  

Screens for cytostasis/cytoxicity have considerable value for the discovery of therapeutic agents and the investigation of the biology of apoptosis. For instance, genetic screens for proteins, protein fragments, peptides, RNAs, or chemicals that kill tissue culture cells may aid in identifying new cancer therapeutic targets. A microplate assay for cell death is needed to achieve throughputs sufficient to sift through thousands of agents from expression or chemical libraries. The authors describe a homogeneous assay for cell death in tissue culture cells compatible with 96- or 384-well plates. In combination with a previously described system for retroviral packaging and transduction, nearly 6000 expression library clones could be screened per week in a 96-well plate format. The screening system may also prove useful for chemical screens. ( Journal of Biomolecular Screening 2003:283-291)


2002 ◽  
Vol 3 (9) ◽  
pp. 683-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorna Casselton ◽  
Miriam Zolan

2001 ◽  
Vol 2 (9) ◽  
pp. 659-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan L. Forsburg

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document