Air blasts as substitutes for electric shock in discrimination learning of white rats.

1940 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. Bayroff
1963 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheldon J. Lachman ◽  
Donald H. Taylor

Under relational conditions with electric shock punishment for incorrect responses, all 9 rats learned to choose the dimmer of two stimuli; no Ss in a parallel group of rats ( N = 6) given equivalent training under absolute conditions reached the learning criterion. Results are interpreted as supporting the Gestalt theory of discrimination learning rather than the theory of Spence.


1964 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Shepherd

Instrumental-avoidance conditioning and classical conditioning as utilized in electrodermal audiometry were compared within a group of 18 normal hearing subjects, a second group of 18 subjects with sensori-neural hearing losses and a third group of 18 subjects suspected of having nonorganic hearing losses. Statistically significant differences and consistent trends suggest that instrumental-avoidance conditioning provided stronger conditioning, greater resistance to adaptation, and better discrimination learning than did classical conditioning within all three groups of subjects. Between-groups comparisons suggest that nonvolunteer subjects are more responsive than volunteer subjects during EDA when electric shock is utilized as the unconditioned stimulus.


1931 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Knight Dunlap ◽  
Evelyn Gentry ◽  
Thornton W. Zeigler
Keyword(s):  

Diabetes ◽  
1967 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 325-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. F. Ehrentheil ◽  
L. J. Reyna ◽  
C. J. Adams ◽  
T. J. Giovanniello ◽  
E. T. Chen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document