Graduate training in community psychology.

1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-179
Author(s):  
Herbert Lipton
Author(s):  
K. Hazel ◽  
T. Pilaczynski ◽  
C. O'Donnell ◽  
G. Meissen ◽  
T. Sasao

1993 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 141-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Glenwick ◽  
Nancy A. Busch-Rossnagel

A graduate practicum combining community psychology and applied developmental psychology perspectives is described. Through classroom and practicum components, we attempted to provide clinical/ community and developmental psychology students with an appreciation of the importance of incorporating and integrating community constructs (e.g., primary prevention and competence building) and developmental constructs (e.g., life-span orientation and developmental processes), as well as constructs common to both (e.g., systems-based analyses), in designing applied interventions. Evaluation data indicated the course was generally successful in increasing the value of conceptual frameworks, knowledge bases, and professional skills of community and applied developmental psychology for both clinical/community and developmental psychology students. Implications for graduate training and the promotion of integrationism in psychology are considered.


1977 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret L. Meyer ◽  
Meg Gerrard

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-26
Author(s):  
Helen M. Sharp ◽  
Mary O'Gara

The Council for Clinical Certification in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology (CCFC) sets accreditation standards and these standards list broad domains of knowledge with specific coverage of “the appropriate etiologies, characteristics, anatomical/physiological, acoustic, psychological, developmental, and linguistic and cultural correlates” and assessment, intervention, and methods of prevention for each domain” (CCFC, 2013, “Standard IV-C”). One domain in the 2014 standards is “voice and resonance.” Studies of graduate training programs suggest that fewer programs require coursework in cleft palate, the course in which resonance was traditionally taught. The purpose of this paper is to propose a standardized learning outcomes specific to resonance that would achieve the minimum knowledge required for all entry-level professionals in speech-language pathology. Graduate programs and faculty should retain flexibility and creativity in how these learning outcomes are achieved. Shared learning objectives across programs would serve programs, faculty, students, accreditation site visitors, and the public in assuring that a consistent, minimum core knowledge is achieved across graduate training programs. Proficiency in the management of individuals with resonance disorders would require additional knowledge and skills.


1979 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 554-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Lounsbury ◽  
Michael P. Cook ◽  
Dianne S. Leader ◽  
Ghassan Rubeiz ◽  
Elizabeth P. Meares

1972 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-14
Author(s):  
ALVIN R. MAHRER
Keyword(s):  

1972 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 181-182
Author(s):  
DAVID L. SINGER

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document