What Is Goal Commitment? An Attitude Strength Perspective

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittany L. Shoots-Reinhard ◽  
Kentaro Fujita ◽  
Kenneth G. DeMarree
1994 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curtis P. Haugtvedt ◽  
Duane T. Wegener

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 709-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura E. Wallace ◽  
Kathleen M. Patton ◽  
Andrew Luttrell ◽  
Vanessa Sawicki ◽  
Leandre R. Fabrigar ◽  
...  

Previous work has reliably demonstrated that when people experience more subjective ambivalence about an attitude object, their attitudes have less impact on strength-related outcomes such as attitude-related thinking, judging, or behaving. However, previous research has not considered whether the amount of perceived knowledge a person has about the topic might moderate these effects. Across eight studies on different topics using a variety of outcome measures, the current research demonstrates that perceived knowledge can moderate the relation between ambivalence and the impact of attitudes on related thinking, judging, and behaving. Although the typical Attitude × Ambivalence effect emerged when participants had relatively high perceived knowledge, this interaction did not emerge when participants were lower in perceived knowledge. This work provides a more nuanced view of the effects of subjective ambivalence on attitude impact and highlights the importance of understanding the combined impact of attitude strength antecedents.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aviva Philipp-Muller ◽  
Laura E. Wallace ◽  
Vanessa Sawicki ◽  
Kathleen M. Patton ◽  
Duane T. Wegener

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Keith

Abstract. The positive effects of goal setting on motivation and performance are among the most established findings of industrial–organizational psychology. Accordingly, goal setting is a common management technique. Lately, however, potential negative effects of goal-setting, for example, on unethical behavior, are increasingly being discussed. This research replicates and extends a laboratory experiment conducted in the United States. In one of three goal conditions (do-your-best goals, consistently high goals, increasingly high goals), 101 participants worked on a search task in five rounds. Half of them (transparency yes/no) were informed at the outset about goal development. We did not find the expected effects on unethical behavior but medium-to-large effects on subjective variables: Perceived fairness of goals and goal commitment were least favorable in the increasing-goal condition, particularly in later goal rounds. Results indicate that when designing goal-setting interventions, organizations may consider potential undesirable long-term effects.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay K. Wood ◽  
Leandre R. Fabrigar ◽  
Steven M. Smith ◽  
Duane T. Wegener

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay K. Wood ◽  
Leandre R. Fabrigar ◽  
Laura D. Hewett ◽  
Duane T. Wegener

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document