Individual Differences in the Context-Dependent Recruitment of Cognitive Control: Evidence From Action Versus State Orientation

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rico Fischer ◽  
Franziska Plessow ◽  
Gesine Dreisbach ◽  
Thomas Goschke
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Cognitive Control ◽  
State Orientation ◽  
Context Dependent

Individual Differences in the Context-Dependent Recruitment of Cognitive Control: Evidence From Action Versus State Orientation

2014 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 575-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rico Fischer ◽  
Franziska Plessow ◽  
Gesine Dreisbach ◽  
Thomas Goschke
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Cognitive Control ◽  
State Orientation ◽  
Context Dependent

scholarly journals Right Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex Mediates Individual Differences in Conflict-driven Cognitive Control

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 3903-3913 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Egner
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Resolution ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Cognitive Control ◽  
Inferior Frontal Gyrus ◽  
Group Analysis ◽  
Individual Variability ◽  
Primary Role ◽  
Conflict Adaptation ◽  
Traditional Group ◽  
Behavioral Expression

Conflict adaptation—a conflict-triggered improvement in the resolution of conflicting stimulus or response representations—has become a widely used probe of cognitive control processes in both healthy and clinical populations. Previous fMRI studies have localized activation foci associated with conflict resolution to dorsolateral PFC (dlPFC). The traditional group analysis approach employed in these studies highlights regions that are, on average, activated during conflict resolution, but does not necessarily reveal areas mediating individual differences in conflict resolution, because between-subject variance is treated as noise. Here, we employed a complementary approach to elucidate the neural bases of variability in the proficiency of conflict-driven cognitive control. We analyzed two independent fMRI data sets of face–word Stroop tasks by using individual variability in the behavioral expression of conflict adaptation as the metric against which brain activation was regressed while controlling for individual differences in mean RT and Stroop interference. Across the two experiments, a replicable neural substrate of individual variation in conflict adaptation was found in ventrolateral PFC (vlPFC), specifically, in the right inferior frontal gyrus, pars orbitalis (BA 47). Unbiased regression estimates showed that variability in activity in this region accounted for ∼40% of the variance in behavioral expression of conflict adaptation across subjects, thus documenting a heretofore unsuspected key role for vlPFC in mediating conflict-driven adjustments in cognitive control. We speculate that vlPFC plays a primary role in conflict control that is supplemented by dlPFC recruitment under conditions of suboptimal performance.

scholarly journals Cognitive control over memory – individual differences in memory performance for emotional and neutral material

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Wierzba ◽  
M. Riegel ◽  
M. Wypych ◽  
K. Jednoróg ◽  
A. Grabowska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Cognitive Control ◽  
Memory Performance ◽  
Neutral Material

Contextuele Afhankelijkheid Bij Beginnende Schrijvers

1988 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 7-19
Author(s):  
M.W. Aalderink
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Cognitive Development ◽  
Young Children ◽  
Empirical Data ◽  
Oral Language ◽  
Theoretical Level ◽  
Contextual Dependency ◽  
Context Dependent ◽  
Beginning Writers

Compared with speaking, writing can be considered to be relatively context independent with regards to both process and product. Young children appear to have problems creating, without interactional support, a discourse that can function as a meaningful whole for a non-present reader. As a result their writing can be contextual dependent in some sense. In this article contextual dependency is discussed on a theoretical level and by illustrating it by means of an example of a seven year old writer. Possible relations between contextual dependency and both cognitive development and individual differences in oral language are considered, and some empirical data are presented that show how frequent and in which ways the texts of beginning writers can be context dependent. From this study it can be concluded that the textuality of young childrens' written products should be defined from the perspective of the child and considering the context in which they were written.

scholarly journals Individual differences in the bilingual brain: The role of language background and DRD2 genotype in verbal and non-verbal cognitive control

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 112-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly A. Vaughn ◽  
Aurora I. Ramos Nuñez ◽  
Maya R. Greene ◽  
Brandin A. Munson ◽  
Elena L. Grigorenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Cognitive Control ◽  
Language Background

scholarly journals Adaptive Engagement of Cognitive Control in Context-Dependent Decision Making

2016 ◽  
pp. bhv333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael L. Waskom ◽  
Michael C. Frank ◽  
Anthony D. Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Cognitive Control ◽  
Context Dependent

scholarly journals The social effects of anger in international negotiations: The role of self-regulation and bargaining power

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Steffen Bertram
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
International Negotiations ◽  
International Negotiation ◽  
Action Orientation ◽  
Personality Differences ◽  
State Orientation ◽  
Personality Difference ◽  
Foreign Counterpart ◽  
The Impact

<p>This thesis addresses recent calls to investigate the influence of individual differences in a negotiation context. Specifically, I investigate the impact of the personality difference, action orientation versus state orientation, on concessionary behaviour in international negotiations.  This personality difference was chosen because it measures a negotiator’s capacity to self-regulate (control their behaviour) in a cognitively demanding situation like an international negotiation. I propose that action oriented negotiators will display superior self-regulation ability, compared to state oriented negotiators. Specifically, action oriented negotiators will be able to adapt their response and concede less than state oriented negotiators, when a foreign counterpart displays anger.  In two online studies, I measure how action oriented and state oriented negotiators respond to a display of anger from a foreign counterpart in an international negotiation. The first study of 159 negotiators showed that action oriented individuals conceded fewer points than state oriented individuals, regardless of whether the counterpart displayed anger. The second study of 260 negotiators showed that action oriented individuals can adapt their behaviour according to their level of power in an international negotiation when facing an angry counterpart.  As far as I am aware, this research is one of the first to propose and test the salience of action orientation versus state orientation on displays of anger in international negotiations. My findings highlight the value of incorporating individual differences in negotiation studies and I propose their inclusion into the dominant theoretical framework of how negotiators respond to anger. In addition to extending the model, I discuss how understanding these personality differences can be useful for multinational companies and their international negotiators.</p>

Individual Differences in the Neural Dynamics of Response Inhibition

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (12) ◽  
pp. 1976-1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Fiona Molloy ◽  
Giwon Bahg ◽  
Zhong-Lin Lu ◽  
Brandon M. Turner
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Cognitive Control ◽  
Response Inhibition ◽  
Bayesian Models ◽  
Accurate Estimation ◽  
Hierarchical Bayesian ◽  
Hierarchical Bayesian Models ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Aggregate Information

Response inhibition is a widely studied aspect of cognitive control that is particularly interesting because of its applications to clinical populations. Although individual differences are integral to cognitive control, so too is our ability to aggregate information across a group of individuals, so that we can powerfully generalize and characterize the group's behavior. Hence, an examination of response inhibition would ideally involve an accurate estimation of both group- and individual-level effects. Hierarchical Bayesian analyses account for individual differences by simultaneously estimating group and individual factors and compensate for sparse data by pooling information across participants. Hierarchical Bayesian models are thus an ideal tool for studying response inhibition, especially when analyzing neural data. We construct hierarchical Bayesian models of the fMRI neural time series, models assuming hierarchies across conditions, participants, and ROIs. Here, we demonstrate the advantages of our models over a conventional generalized linear model in accurately separating signal from noise. We then apply our models to go/no-go and stop signal data from 11 participants. We find strong evidence for individual differences in neural responses to going, not going, and stopping and in functional connectivity across the two tasks and demonstrate how hierarchical Bayesian models can effectively compensate for these individual differences while providing group-level summarizations. Finally, we validated the reliability of our findings using a larger go/no-go data set consisting of 179 participants. In conclusion, hierarchical Bayesian models not only account for individual differences but allow us to better understand the cognitive dynamics of response inhibition.

The Case of the Cognitive (Opti)miser: Electrophysiological Correlates of Working Memory Maintenance Predict Demand Avoidance

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 1550-1561
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Nador ◽  
Assaf Harel ◽  
Ion Juvina ◽  
Brandon Minnery
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Cognitive Control ◽  
Cognitive Task ◽  
Cognitive Effort ◽  
Task Demands ◽  
Match To Sample ◽  
Irrelevant Distractors ◽  
Filtering Efficiency ◽  
Task Irrelevant

People are often considered cognitive misers. When given a free choice between two tasks, people tend to choose tasks requiring less cognitive effort. Such demand avoidance (DA) is associated with cognitive control, but it is still not clear to what extent individual differences in cognitive control can account for variations in DA. We sought to elucidate the relation between cognitive control and cognitive effort preferences by investigating the extent to which sustained neural activity in a task requiring cognitive control is correlated with DA. We hypothesized that neural measures of efficient filtering will predict individual variations in demand preferences. To test this hypothesis, we had participants perform a delayed-match-to-sample paradigm with their ERPs recorded, as well as a separate behavioral demand-selection task. We focused on the ERP correlates of cognitive filtering efficiency (CFE)—the ability to ignore task-irrelevant distractors during working memory maintenance—as it manifests in a modulation of the contralateral delay activity, an ERP correlate of cognitive control. As predicted, we found a significant positive correlation between CFE and DA. Individuals with high CFE tended to be significantly more demand avoidant than their low-CFE counterparts. Low-CFE individuals, in comparison, did not form distinct cognitive effort preferences. Overall, our results suggest that cognitive control over the contents of visual working memory contribute to individual differences in the expression of cognitive effort preferences. This further implies that these observed preferences are the product of sensitivity to cognitive task demands.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document