Patients’ individual differences in implicit and explicit expectations from the therapist as a function of attachment orientation.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigal Zilcha-Mano ◽  
Tohar Dolev-Amit ◽  
Hadar Fisher ◽  
Tsachi Ein-Dor ◽  
Bernhard Strauß
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Attachment Orientation ◽  
Implicit And Explicit

Memory Span and Individual Differences in Activation: Implicit and Explicit Measures

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsey Lilienthal ◽  
Elaine Tamez ◽  
Nathan Rose ◽  
Joel Myerson ◽  
Sandra Hale
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Memory Span ◽  
Implicit And Explicit ◽  
Explicit Measures

scholarly journals Holding Back the Tears: Individual Differences in Adult Crying Proneness Reflect Attachment Orientation and Attitudes to Crying

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abigail Millings ◽  
Erica G. Hepper ◽  
Claire M. Hart ◽  
Louise Swift ◽  
Angela C. Rowe
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Attachment Orientation ◽  
Holding Back

scholarly journals How and why do number-space associations co-vary in implicit and explicit magnitude processing tasks?

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie Georges ◽  
Danielle Hoffmann ◽  
Christine Schiltz
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Spatial Visualization ◽  
Cognitive Factors ◽  
Snarc Effect ◽  
Spatial Coding ◽  
Magnitude Processing ◽  
Arithmetic Performance ◽  
Positive Correlations ◽  
Implicit And Explicit ◽  
Or Task

Evidence for number-space associations in implicit and explicit magnitude processing tasks comes from the parity and magnitude SNARC effect respectively. Different spatial accounts were suggested to underlie these spatial-numerical associations (SNAs) with some inconsistencies in the literature. To determine whether the parity and magnitude SNAs arise from a single predominant account or task-dependent coding mechanisms, we adopted an individual differences approach to study their correlation and the extent of their association with arithmetic performance, spatial visualization ability and visualization profile. Additionally, we performed moderation analyses to determine whether the relation between these SNAs depended on individual differences in those cognitive factors. The parity and magnitude SNAs did not correlate and were differentially predicted by arithmetic performance and visualization profile respectively. These variables, however, also moderated the relation between the SNAs. While positive correlations were observed in object-visualizers with lower arithmetic performances, correlations were negative in spatial-visualizers with higher arithmetic performances. This suggests the predominance of a single account for both implicit and explicit SNAs in the two types of visualizers. However, the spatial nature of the account differs between object- and spatial-visualizers. No relation occurred in mixed-visualizers, indicating the activation of task-dependent coding mechanisms. Individual differences in arithmetic performance and visualization profile thus determined whether SNAs in implicit and explicit tasks co-varied and supposedly relied on similar or unrelated spatial coding mechanisms. This explains some inconsistencies in the literature regarding SNAs and highlights the usefulness of moderation analyses for understanding how the relation between different numerical concepts varies between individuals.

Unconscious Unease and Self-Handicapping: Behavioral Consequences of Individual Differences in Implicit and Explicit Self-Esteem

1999 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 535-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah R. Spalding ◽  
Curtis D. Hardin
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Social Behavior ◽  
Direct Evidence ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
The Self ◽  
Behavioral Consequences ◽  
Interview Performance ◽  
Implicit And Explicit

In contrast to measures of explicit self-esteem, which assess introspectively accessible self-evaluations, measures of implicit self-esteem assess the valence of unconscious, introspectively inaccessible associations to the self. This experiment is the first to document a relationship between individual differences in implicit self-esteem and social behavior: Participants completed either a self-relevant or a self-irrelevant interview, and were then rated by the interviewer on their anxiety. When the interview was self-relevant, apparent anxiety was greater for participants low in implicit self-esteem than for participants high in self-esteem; implicit self-esteem did not predict anxiety when the interview was self-irrelevant. Explicit self-esteem did not predict apparent anxiety in either interview, but did predict participants' explicit self-judgments of anxiety. Self-handicapping about interview performance was greater for participants low in both explicit and implicit self-esteem than for those high in these measures. The experiment provides direct evidence that effects of implicit and explicit self-esteem may be dissociated.

scholarly journals Attached to dating apps: Attachment orientations and preferences for dating apps

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristi Chin ◽  
Robin S. Edelstein ◽  
Philip A. Vernon
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Common Reason ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Online Behavior ◽  
Anxious Attachment ◽  
Attachment Orientations ◽  
Avoidant Attachment ◽  
Dating Apps ◽  
Attachment Orientation

Our study examines attachment-related differences in the use of dating applications (dating apps). We collected online survey data regarding people’s attachment orientation and dating app preferences. People with a more anxious attachment orientation were more likely to report using dating apps than people lower in anxious attachment; people with a more avoidant attachment orientation were less likely to report using dating apps than people lower in avoidant attachment. Participants who used dating apps cited Tinder, OkCupid, and Plenty of Fish as those most commonly used. The most common reason people reported for using apps was to meet others, and the most common reason people reported for not using apps was difficulty trusting people online. Our findings suggest that individual differences in attachment may be relevant for understanding online behavior, and that dating apps might be a fruitful avenue for future research on attachment-related differences.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document