scholarly journals Predictors of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics choice options: A meta-analytic path analysis of the social–cognitive choice model by gender and race/ethnicity.

2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Lent ◽  
Hung-Bin Sheu ◽  
Matthew J. Miller ◽  
Megan E. Cusick ◽  
Lee T. Penn ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 680-696
Author(s):  
Hung-Bin Sheu ◽  
Robert W. Lent ◽  
Angela M. Lui ◽  
Xiao Ting Wang ◽  
Laura Phrasavath ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Lent ◽  
Matthew J. Miller ◽  
Paige E. Smith ◽  
Bevlee A. Watford ◽  
Robert H. Lim ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. 77-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Lent ◽  
Matthew J. Miller ◽  
Paige E. Smith ◽  
Bevlee A. Watford ◽  
Kayi Hui ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hung-Bin Sheu ◽  
Matthew J. Miller ◽  
Robert W. Lent ◽  
Steven D. Brown ◽  
Kelly Hennessy ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica R. Gladstone ◽  
Andrei Cimpian

AbstractIs exposing students to role models an effective tool for diversifying science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)? So far, the evidence for this claim is mixed. Here, we set out to identify systematic sources of variability in STEM role models’ effects on student motivation: If we determine which role models are effective for which students, we will be in a better position to maximize role models’ impact as a tool for diversifying STEM. A systematic narrative review of the literature (55 articles) investigated the effects of role models on students’ STEM motivation as a function of several key features of the role models (their perceived competence, their perceived similarity to students, and the perceived attainability of their success) and the students (their gender, race/ethnicity, age, and identification with STEM). We conclude with four concrete recommendations for ensuring that STEM role models are motivating for students of all backgrounds and demographics—an important step toward diversifying STEM.


2016 ◽  
Vol 94 ◽  
pp. 79-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Lent ◽  
Matthew J. Miller ◽  
Paige E. Smith ◽  
Bevlee A. Watford ◽  
Robert H. Lim ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Fort ◽  
Anca Murariu

The twofold aim of this study was first to extend results on the career choice model previously obtained with students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics and to gauge the relevance of including self-efficacy for coping with barriers in this model. The second aim was to examine whether examined paths varied according to gender. We investigated the paths between social support, barriers, barrier-coping efficacy, and goals in a sample of 215 students drawn from disciplines where men are underrepresented. In line with the hypothetical model, results revealed significant paths between social support, barriers, barrier-coping efficacy, and goals. Moreover, these paths did not vary according to gender. Results are discussed with reference to the literature and in terms of their practical implications.


2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 300-329
Author(s):  
Julia Mcquillan ◽  
Nestor Hernandez

Intersecting systems of inequality (i.e., gender and race/ethnicity) are remarkably resistant to change. Many universities, however, seek National Science Foundation Institutional Transformation awards to change processes, procedures, and cultures to make science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) departments more inclusive. In this article we describe a case study with observations for eight years of before (2000–2007), five during (2008–2013), and seven after (2014–2020) intensive efforts to increase women through reducing barriers and increasing access to women. Finally, we reflect on flawed assumptions built into the proposal, the slow and uneven change in the proportion of women over time, the strengths and weaknesses of numeric assessments, and the value of a longer view for seeing how seeds planted with promising practices initiated during the award may end with the funding but can reemerge and bear fruit when faculty who engage in equity work are in positions of authority later in their careers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document