Avoiding the potential pitfalls of using negative priming tasks in developmental studies: Assessing inhibitory control in children, adolescents, and adults.

2009 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 272-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Verena E. Pritchard ◽  
Ewald Neumann
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 314-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandrine Rossi ◽  
Julie Vidal ◽  
Marie Letang ◽  
Olivier Houdé ◽  
Grégoire Borst

For children, adolescents and educated adults, comparing fractions with common numerators (e.g., 4/5 vs. 4/9) is more challenging than comparing fractions with common denominators (e.g., 3/4 vs. 6/4) or fractions with no common components (e.g., 5/7 vs. 6/2). Errors are related to the tendency to rely on the “greater the whole number, the greater the fraction” strategy, according to which 4/9 seems larger than 4/5 because 9 is larger than 5. We aimed to determine whether the ability of adolescents and educated adults to compare fractions with common numerators was rooted in part in their ability to inhibit the use of this misleading strategy by adapting the negative priming paradigm. We found that participants were slower to compare the magnitude of two fractions with common denominators after they compared the magnitude of two fractions with common numerators than after they decided which of two fractions possessed a denominator larger than the numerator. The negative priming effects reported suggest that inhibitory control is needed at all ages to avoid errors when comparing fractions with common numerators.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. e0257753
Author(s):  
Lison Bouhours ◽  
Anaëlle Camarda ◽  
Monique Ernst ◽  
Anaïs Osmont ◽  
Grégoire Borst ◽  
...  

The aim of the present study is to examine whether in Hot, i.e., affectively charged contexts, or cool, i.e., affectively neutral contexts, inhibitory control capacity increases or decreases under social evaluation in adolescents and adults. In two experiments, adolescents and young adults completed two Stroop-like tasks under either a social evaluation condition or an alone condition. The social evaluation condition comprised the presence of a peer (Experiment 1) or an expert (Experiment 2) playing the role of an evaluator, while under the alone condition, the task was performed alone. In the Cool Stroop task, participants had to refrain from reading color names to identify the ink color in which the words were printed. In the Hot Stroop task, participants had to determine the emotional expression conveyed by faces from the NimStim database while ignoring the emotion word displayed beneath. The results were similar in both experiments. In adolescents, social evaluation by a peer (Experiment 1) or by an expert (Experience 2) facilitated Hot but not cool inhibitory control. In adults, social evaluation had no effect on Hot or cool inhibitory control. The present findings expand our understanding of the favorable influence of socioemotional context on Hot inhibitory control during adolescence in healthy individuals.


2016 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 1825-1840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ania Aïte ◽  
Alain Berthoz ◽  
Julie Vidal ◽  
Margot Roëll ◽  
Mohamed Zaoui ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 40-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amélie Lubin ◽  
Sandrine Rossi ◽  
Céline Lanoë ◽  
Julie Vidal ◽  
Olivier Houdé ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 1377-1388 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Marsh ◽  
C. Philip Beaman ◽  
Robert W. Hughes ◽  
Dylan M. Jones

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathieu Cassotti

The aim of the present study is to examine whether in hot, i.e., affectively charged contexts, or cool, i.e., affectively neutral contexts, inhibitory control capacity increases or decreases under social evaluation in adolescents and adults. In two experiments, adolescents and young adults completed two Stroop-like tasks under either a social evaluation condition or a control condition. The social evaluation condition comprised the presence of a peer (Experiment 1) or an adult (Experiment 2) playing the role of an evaluator, while under the control condition, the task was performed alone. In the Cool Stroop task, participants had to refrain from reading color names to identify the ink color in which the words were printed. In the Hot Stroop task, participants had to determine the emotional expression conveyed by faces from the NimStim database while ignoring the emotion word displayed beneath. The results were similar in both experiments. In adolescents, social evaluation by a peer (Experiment 1) or by an adult (Experience 2) facilitated hot but not cool inhibitory control in adolescents. In adults, social evaluation had no effect on hot or cool inhibitory control. The present findings expand our understanding of the favorable influence of socioemotional context on hot inhibitory control during adolescence in healthy individuals.


2013 ◽  
Vol 105 (3) ◽  
pp. 701-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amélie Lubin ◽  
Julie Vidal ◽  
Céline Lanoë ◽  
Olivier Houdé ◽  
Grégoire Borst

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 18-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Céline Lanoë ◽  
Julie Vidal ◽  
Amélie Lubin ◽  
Olivier Houdé ◽  
Grégoire Borst

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document