Specific risk conditions: Contextual variables that influence risk and resilience.

2004 ◽  
pp. 53-76
Author(s):  
Susan Epps ◽  
Barbara J. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Risk And Resilience ◽  
Contextual Variables ◽  
Specific Risk

Perceptual Characteristics of Consonant Production in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 1411-1431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Bislick ◽  
William D. Hula
Keyword(s):  
Error Rate ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Group Differences ◽  
Diagnostic Process ◽  
Apraxia Of Speech ◽  
Contextual Variables ◽  
Error Type ◽  
Type Distribution ◽  
Phonetic Features ◽  
Syllable Position

Purpose This retrospective analysis examined group differences in error rate across 4 contextual variables (clusters vs. singletons, syllable position, number of syllables, and articulatory phonetic features) in adults with apraxia of speech (AOS) and adults with aphasia only. Group differences in the distribution of error type across contextual variables were also examined. Method Ten individuals with acquired AOS and aphasia and 11 individuals with aphasia participated in this study. In the context of a 2-group experimental design, the influence of 4 contextual variables on error rate and error type distribution was examined via repetition of 29 multisyllabic words. Error rates were analyzed using Bayesian methods, whereas distribution of error type was examined via descriptive statistics. Results There were 4 findings of robust differences between the 2 groups. These differences were found for syllable position, number of syllables, manner of articulation, and voicing. Group differences were less robust for clusters versus singletons and place of articulation. Results of error type distribution show a high proportion of distortion and substitution errors in speakers with AOS and a high proportion of substitution and omission errors in speakers with aphasia. Conclusion Findings add to the continued effort to improve the understanding and assessment of AOS and aphasia. Several contextual variables more consistently influenced breakdown in participants with AOS compared to participants with aphasia and should be considered during the diagnostic process. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9701690

953: Age-Specific Risk of Prostate Cancer if PSA is between the Median Value and Commonly Used Biopsy Thresholds

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 258-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shilajit D. Kundu ◽  
Kimberly A. Roehl ◽  
Jo Ann V. Antenor ◽  
William J. Catalona ◽  
Robert B. Nadler
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Risk

Risk and Resilience, British Style

1993 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-88
Author(s):  
Ann S. Masten
Keyword(s):  
Risk And Resilience

Risk and Resilience From Early Experiences to Longevity: Findings From the VA Normative Aging Study

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lewina O. Lee ◽  
Carolyn M. Aldwin ◽  
Laura D. Kubzansky ◽  
Daniel K. Mroczek ◽  
Avron Spiro Iii
Keyword(s):  
Risk And Resilience ◽  
Early Experiences ◽  
Normative Aging Study ◽  
Aging Study ◽  
Normative Aging

Trajectories of Psychological Risk and Resilience in World Trade Center Responders

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Feder ◽  
Robert Pietrzak ◽  
Ritika Singh ◽  
Clyde Schechter ◽  
Jill Barron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
World Trade ◽  
World Trade Center ◽  
Risk And Resilience ◽  
Trade Center ◽  
Psychological Risk

Risk and resilience in high-risk samples: How to promote positive outcomes for young children

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margo Candelaria ◽  
Kathy Katz ◽  
Anna Quigg ◽  
Sarah Oberlander ◽  
Margo Candelaria
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Young Children ◽  
Positive Outcomes ◽  
Risk And Resilience
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document