Correlation of Interfacial Tension of Two-Phase Three-Component Systems

1957 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 1035-1042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelson F. Murphy ◽  
John E. Lastovica ◽  
James G. Fallis
1961 ◽  
Vol 1 (04) ◽  
pp. 259-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.W. Hough ◽  
G.L. Stegemeier

Abstract Empirical equations for surface tension of propane and normal butane as functions of reduced temperature are obtained from experimental data. Another correlation relating surface tension to enthalpy of vaporization is given for these two compounds. In addition, new parachor numbers are calculated for the normal paraffin hydrocarbons. These numbers are utilized for the calculation of interfacial tension of two-component systems as functions of pressure and temperature, using a modified form of Weinaug-Katz equation. The experimental data for two binary systems are approximated by the correlation. From these results it is found that the inter facial tension in the high-pressure region remains extremely low at large pressure decrements below the critical pressure. Thus, it appears that condensate systems may have flow characteristics almost like single-phase conditions even though the pressure is within the two-phase region. Experimental data have shown that interfacial tension divided by density difference approaches zero as the critical pressure is approached. A calculation of wetting-phase saturations indicates that the saturation gradient at the two-phase contact becomes increasingly abrupt as the critical pressure is approached. Discussion Prediction of the surface and interfacial tension of the light hydrocarbons and of two-component hydrocarbon mixtures at various temperatures and pressures may be made if other physical properties are known. Extensive experimental work on single-component and binary systems is the basis for the correlations outlined in this paper. Interfacial tension is defined as the specific surface-free energy between two phases of unlike fractional composition, while surface tension is defined as the specific surface-free energy between two phases of the same fractional composition. The usual definitions relating interfacial tension to a liquid-liquid interface and surface tension to a gas-liquid interface are not clearly defined when the critical region is included, and there is no sharp distinction between a gas and a liquid phase. Interfacial tension is probably the most important single force that makes one-half to one-third of the total oil actually in place in a reservoir rock unrecoverable by conventional gas-drive or waterflood methods. A rough estimate of this figure for the United States is 100 billion bbl. Interfacial tension presently is used by petroleum engineers in the estimation of saturation gradients at the gas-oil contact and at the oil-water contact. The data in this paper should prove useful for estimates of reserves involving gas-oil contacts. Relative permeability undoubtedly is influenced by interfacial tension, for sufficiently small values. These data should be useful in determining how small the values are. In addition, these data should eventually add to our fundamental knowledge of surfaces. At the critical point, all surface excesses approach zero and the thickness becomes very large. SINGLE-COMPONENT SYSTEMS It has been observed that the following relationships are good approximations to the physical properties of propane and n-butane. For propane, For n-butane, Guggenheim's values for these constants, not specifically for hydrocarbons, are SPEJ P. 259^


1992 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 1419-1423
Author(s):  
Jindřich Weiss

New data on critical holdups of dispersed phase were measured at which the phase inversion took place. The systems studied differed in the ratio of phase viscosities and interfacial tension. A weak dependence was found of critical holdups on the impeller revolutions and on the material contactor; on the contrary, a considerable effect of viscosity was found out as far as the viscosity of continuous phase exceeded that of dispersed phase.


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (38) ◽  
pp. 21305-21314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehsan Atefi ◽  
Ramila Joshi ◽  
Jay Adin Mann ◽  
Hossein Tavana

Lab on a Chip ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 2437-2444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byeong-Ui Moon ◽  
Steven G. Jones ◽  
Dae Kun Hwang ◽  
Scott S. H. Tsai

Simple microfluidic flow focusing generation of droplets from ultralow interfacial tension aqueous two phase systems (ATPS).


2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (05) ◽  
pp. 933-939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristian Jessen ◽  
Franklin M. Orr

Summary Measurements of the interfacial tension (IFT) of mixtures of a reservoir fluid and injection gas at various pressures have been proposed as an experimental method for predicting the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) in an experiment referred to as the vanishing-IFT (VIT) technique. In this paper, we analyze the accuracy and reliability of the VIT approach using phase equilibrium and slimtube experimental observations and equation-of-state (EOS) calculations of the behavior of VIT experiments for the same systems. We consider 13 gas/oil systems for which phase equilibrium and density data and slimtube measurements of the MMP are available. We show that tuned EOS characterizations using 15 components to represent the gas/oil systems yield calculations of phase compositions and densities and calculated MMPs that reproduce the experimental observations accurately. We assume that IFTs can be calculated with a parachor expression, and we simulate the behavior of a series of VIT experiments with different mixture compositions in the VIT cell. We show that compositions of mixtures created in the VIT cell are not, in general, critical mixtures and that calculated estimates of the MMP obtained by the VIT approach depend strongly on the composition of the mixture used in the experiment. We show also that those MMP estimates may or may not differ significantly from values obtained in slimtube displacements. Fortuitously chosen mixture compositions can result in VIT-experiment estimates that agree well with slimtube MMPs, while for other mixtures, the error of the estimates can be quite large. In particular, we show that errors in the VIT-technique estimate of the MMP are often large for gas/oil systems for which the first-contact miscibility pressure (FCMP) is much larger than the slimtube MMP. We conclude, therefore, that the VIT experiment is not a reliable single source of information regarding the development of multicontact miscibility in multicomponent gas/oil displacements. Introduction Many oil fields are now candidates for enhanced-oil-recovery processes such as tertiary gasfloods or miscible water-alternating-gas injection schemes. The MMP is an important parameter in the design and implementation of these displacement processes and, hence, it is equally important that the MMP be determined by a method that is both reliable and accurate. Several methods have been proposed for measurement of the MMP. The slimtube-displacement experiment is the most commonly used approach (Yellig and Metcalfe 1980; Holm and Josendal 1982; Orr et al. 1982). Because of the time-consuming process of performing multiple slimtube-displacement experiments, alternative experimental approaches have been proposed. Some investigators have suggested use of a rising-bubble experiment, in which observations of bubbles of injection gas rising through oil (Christiansen and Haines 1987; Eakin and Mitch 1988; Novosad et al. 1990; Sibbald et al. 1991; Mihcakan and Poettmann 1994), are a basis of a method for determining the MMP. Zhou and Orr (1988) concluded that the changes in bubble behavior observed in the rising-bubble experiment are caused primarily by changes in IFT as components in the bubble dissolve in the oil and components in the oil transfer to the bubble. They showed that rising-bubble experiments could be used to measure the MMP for vaporizing gas drives, but are less accurate for condensing gas drives, while a drop of oil falling through gas could be used to determine the MMP for condensing gas drives. Whether either a falling-drop or a rising-bubble experiment could be used to determine the MMP accurately in condensing/vaporizing gas drives such as those described by Zick (1986), Stalkup (1987), and Johns et al. (1993) has not been determined. Rao and coworkers proposed a different use of IFT observations to determine the MMP (Rao 1997, 1999; Rao and Lee 2002, 2003; Ayirala et al. 2003; Ayirala and Rao 2004, 2006a, 2006b; Sequeira 2006). They measured IFTs for pendant drops of oil suspended in a cell containing a two-phase mixture of the injection gas and the oil. In that approach, known as the VIT experiment, the IFT is measured at a sequence of pressures, and the MMP is taken to be the pressure at which the IFT plotted as a function of pressure extrapolates to zero IFT. Orr and Jessen (2007) presented an analysis of the VIT technique based on EOS calculations for well-characterized ternary and quaternary gas/oil systems and demonstrated that the VIT experiment may give estimates of the MMP that differ significantly from the MMP based on critical tie-lines for condensing, vaporizing, and condensing/vaporizing gas drives. In this paper, we extend the analysis of Orr and Jessen (2007) and calculate the IFT behavior that would be observed in the VIT experiment for gas displacements of multicomponent crude-oil systems. We assess the accuracy of MMP estimated by the VIT approach for 13 multicomponent gas/oil displacements for which experimental phase-equilibrium and slimtube data are available, and we demonstrate that for these multicomponent crude-oil systems, the VIT approach can give estimates of the MMP that are close to the actual MMP or that are significantly in error, depending on the compositions of mixtures created in the equilibrium cell.


RSC Advances ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (56) ◽  
pp. 32644-32655
Author(s):  
Shuli Wang ◽  
Boyang Ding ◽  
Yongchao Rao ◽  
Feng Chen

In view of the widespread existence of swirl flow in surfactant systems in oil drilling, gas gathering, and gathering pipelines, surfactants can affect interfacial tension and thus change the flow pattern.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document