Upconversion Model for Directly Determining the Microscopic Energy-Transfer Parameters for β-NaYF4:Er3+

2020 ◽  
Vol 124 (46) ◽  
pp. 25509-25520
Author(s):  
Jiangfan Liu ◽  
Tairan Fu ◽  
Congling Shi
Keyword(s):  
Energy Transfer ◽  
Transfer Parameters ◽  
Microscopic Energy

scholarly journals Time-Resolved Measurements and Master Equation Modelling of the Unimolecular Decomposition of CH3OCH2

2020 ◽  
Vol 234 (7-9) ◽  
pp. 1233-1250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arrke J. Eskola ◽  
Mark A. Blitz ◽  
Michael J. Pilling ◽  
Paul W. Seakins ◽  
Robin J. Shannon
Keyword(s):  
Energy Transfer ◽  
Master Equation ◽  
Rate Coefficient ◽  
Zero Point ◽  
Buffer Gas ◽  
Unimolecular Decomposition ◽  
Time Resolved ◽  
Point Energy ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Transfer Parameters

AbstractThe rate coefficient for the unimolecular decomposition of CH3OCH2, k1, has been measured in time-resolved experiments by monitoring the HCHO product. CH3OCH2 was rapidly and cleanly generated by 248 nm excimer photolysis of oxalyl chloride, (ClCO)2, in an excess of CH3OCH3, and an excimer pumped dye laser tuned to 353.16 nm was used to probe HCHO via laser induced fluorescence. k1(T,p) was measured over the ranges: 573–673 K and 0.1–4.3 × 1018 molecule cm−3 with a helium bath gas. In addition, some experiments were carried out with nitrogen as the bath gas. Ab initio calculations on CH3OCH2 decomposition were carried out and a transition-state for decomposition to CH3 and H2CO was identified. This information was used in a master equation rate calculation, using the MESMER code, where the zero-point-energy corrected barrier to reaction, ΔE0,1, and the energy transfer parameters, ⟨ΔEdown⟩ × Tn, were the adjusted parameters to best fit the experimental data, with helium as the buffer gas. The data were combined with earlier measurements by Loucks and Laidler (Can J. Chem.1967, 45, 2767), with dimethyl ether as the third body, reinterpreted using current literature for the rate coefficient for recombination of CH3OCH2. This analysis returned ΔE0,1 = (112.3 ± 0.6) kJ mol−1, and leads to $k_{1}^{\infty}(T)=2.9\times{10^{12}}$ (T/300)2.5 exp(−106.8 kJ mol−1/RT). Using this model, limited experiments with nitrogen as the bath gas allowed N2 energy transfer parameters to be identified and then further MESMER simulations were carried out, where N2 was the buffer gas, to generate k1(T,p) over a wide range of conditions: 300–1000 K and N2 = 1012–1025 molecule cm−3. The resulting k1(T,p) has been parameterized using a Troe-expression, so that they can be readily be incorporated into combustion models. In addition, k1(T,p) has been parametrized using PLOG for the buffer gases, He, CH3OCH3 and N2.

Spectroscopic and energy-transfer parameters for Er^3+-doped and Er^3+, Pr^3+-codoped GeGaS glasses

2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 1982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Coleman ◽  
Paul Golding ◽  
Terence A. King ◽  
Stuart D. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Energy Transfer ◽  
Transfer Parameters

Microscopic energy transfer spectroscopy to determine mitochondrial malfunction in human myotubes

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Gschwend ◽  
Wolfgang S. L. Strauss ◽  
H. Brinkmeier ◽  
R. Ruedel ◽  
Rudolf W. Steiner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Transfer ◽  
Human Myotubes ◽  
Microscopic Energy

The calculation and interpretation of average collisional energy transfer parameters

1988 ◽  
Vol 152 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 377-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R. Whyte ◽  
Kieran F. Lim ◽  
Robert G. Gilbert ◽  
William L. Hase
Keyword(s):  
Energy Transfer ◽  
Collisional Energy ◽  
Transfer Parameters ◽  
Collisional Energy Transfer
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document