Co-evolution of firms and strategic alliances: Theory and empirical evidence

2009 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 620-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Wilson ◽  
N. Hynes
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Strategic Alliances

Flexible Integration, Scope Economies, and Strategic Alliances: Social and Spatial Mediations

1988 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Cooke
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Strategic Alliances ◽  
Work Practices ◽  
Spatial Integration ◽  
Scope Economies ◽  
Interfirm Relations ◽  
Flexible Integration ◽  
Flexible Accumulation

An outline of international productivity, competitiveness, and profitability indicators is given in support of the contention that capital has been reorganizing more or less successfully, albeit unevenly of late. There follows a discussion of the relative merits of two theories which seek to address what some have called the transition from Fordism to post-Fordism. It is argued that the notion of ‘flexible accumulation’, although superior in principle to that of ‘disorganized capitalism’ as a general orienting device, is too loosely specified at present. In particular, attention is drawn to the growth of social and spatial integration as a key element of interfirm relations in a context of growing flexibility. Empirical evidence is adduced in support of the argument that flexibility involves internal changes in work practices and external changes in relations with competitors which are likely to have far-reaching spatial resonances.

scholarly journals Innovative capabilities and strategic alliances: Who is gaining what in the pharmaceutical industry?

1969 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marisa Ohba ◽  
Paulo N Figueiredo
Keyword(s):  
Pharmaceutical Industry ◽  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Strategic Alliances ◽  
Pharmaceutical Companies ◽  
Entry And Exit ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Corporate Managers ◽  
The Past ◽  
Innovative Capabilities

There have been several respected studies, from a capability-based perspective, pointing to the emergence of a new division of innovative labour in the pharmaceutical industry over the past decades. We still, however, miss empirical evidence relative to the implications of collaborative arrangements, like strategic alliances, for the innovative capabilities of companies involved in such collaborative arrangements. Drawing on a scrutiny of specialised databases (Galé, Dialog, and Business & Industry) covering the 1993–2003 period, this paper examines the entry and exit composition of innovative capabilities of 25 pharmaceutical companies' capabilities involved in such alliances. They are organised in three groups: (i) large pharmaceutical companies ('big-pharma'); (ii) large bio-pharmaceutical companies ('bio-pharma'); and (iii) small and research-intensive companies. The evidence shows the extent to which each of these three types companies, particularly large companies, benefit from these alliances in terms of absorption of strategic pieces of innovative capabilities. Such type of evidence is important to provide researchers, corporate managers, and policy makers with a concrete notion of some features of the nature of such division of innovative labour that occurs and the actual changes going on in the structure and organisation of innovative activities in the pharmaceutical industry.

Challenges to the social motivation theory of autism: The dangers of counteracting an imprecise theory with even more imprecision

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirko Uljarević ◽  
Giacomo Vivanti ◽  
Susan R. Leekam ◽  
Antonio Y. Hardan
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Social Motivation ◽  
Motivation Theory ◽  
The Social

Abstract The arguments offered by Jaswal & Akhtar to counter the social motivation theory (SMT) do not appear to be directly related to the SMT tenets and predictions, seem to not be empirically testable, and are inconsistent with empirical evidence. To evaluate the merits and shortcomings of the SMT and identify scientifically testable alternatives, advances are needed on the conceptualization and operationalization of social motivation across diagnostic boundaries.

Integrating perspectives: How the development of second-personal competence lays the foundation for a second-personal morality

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Corbit ◽  
Chris Moore
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Developmental Process ◽  
Focal Point ◽  
Personal Information ◽  
Personal Competence ◽  
Triadic Interactions ◽  
Personal Morality ◽  
Integrative Process

Abstract The integration of first-, second-, and third-personal information within joint intentional collaboration provides the foundation for broad-based second-personal morality. We offer two additions to this framework: a description of the developmental process through which second-personal competence emerges from early triadic interactions, and empirical evidence that collaboration with a concrete goal may provide an essential focal point for this integrative process.

Men Are Hierarchical, Women Are Egalitarian: An Implicit Gender Stereotype

2004 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Schmid Mast
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Implicit Association Test ◽  
Gender Stereotype ◽  
Association Test ◽  
Implicit Association ◽  
Two Samples

The goal of the present study was to provide empirical evidence for the existence of an implicit hierarchy gender stereotype indicating that men are more readily associated with hierarchies and women are more readily associated with egalitarian structures. To measure the implicit hierarchy gender stereotype, the Implicit Association Test (IAT, Greenwald et al., 1998) was used. Two samples of undergraduates (Sample 1: 41 females, 22 males; Sample 2: 35 females, 37 males) completed a newly developed paper-based hierarchy-gender IAT. Results showed that there was an implicit hierarchy gender stereotype: the association between male and hierarchical and between female and egalitarian was stronger than the association between female and hierarchical and between male and egalitarian. Additionally, men had a more pronounced implicit hierarchy gender stereotype than women.

Socially Shared Regulation of Learning: A Review

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernesto Panadero ◽  
Sanna Järvelä
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Learning Theory ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Social Regulation ◽  
Observation Data ◽  
Optimal Form ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
The Past ◽  
Recorded Observation ◽  
Socially Shared Regulation

Abstract. Socially shared regulation of learning (SSRL) has been recognized as a new and growing field in the framework of self-regulated learning theory in the past decade. In the present review, we examine the empirical evidence to support such a phenomenon. A total of 17 articles addressing SSRL were identified, 13 of which presented empirical evidence. Through a narrative review it could be concluded that there is enough data to maintain the existence of SSRL in comparison to other social regulation (e.g., co-regulation). It was found that most of the SSRL research has focused on characterizing phenomena through the use of mixed methods through qualitative data, mostly video-recorded observation data. Also, SSRL seems to contribute to students’ performance. Finally, the article discusses the need for the field to move forward, exploring the best conditions to promote SSRL, clarifying whether SSRL is always the optimal form of collaboration, and identifying more aspects of groups’ characteristics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document