Probabilistic seismic vulnerability and loss assessment of a seismic resistance bridge system with post-tensioning precast segmental ultra-high performance concrete bridge columns

2020 ◽  
Vol 225 ◽  
pp. 111321
Author(s):  
Shuai Li ◽  
Taiyi Zhao ◽  
M. Shahria Alam ◽  
Zhao Cheng ◽  
Jing-quan Wang
Keyword(s):  
High Performance ◽  
Seismic Vulnerability ◽  
High Performance Concrete ◽  
Bridge Columns ◽  
Seismic Resistance ◽  
Concrete Bridge ◽  
Loss Assessment ◽  
Ultra High Performance Concrete ◽  
Resistance Bridge ◽  
Bridge System

scholarly journals Shrinkage in Ultra-High Performance Concrete Overlays on Concrete Bridge Decks

2019 ◽  
Vol 271 ◽  
pp. 07008
Author(s):  
William Toledo ◽  
Leticia Davila ◽  
Ahmed Al-Basha ◽  
Craig Newtson ◽  
Brad Weldon
Keyword(s):  
High Performance ◽  
High Performance Concrete ◽  
Bridge Decks ◽  
Plastic State ◽  
Early Age ◽  
Concrete Bridge ◽  
Ultra High Performance Concrete ◽  
Concrete Overlays ◽  
Concrete Bridge Decks ◽  
Normal Strength

This paper investigates the shrinkage and thermal effects of an ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) mixture proposed for use as an overlay material for concrete bridge decks. In this study, early-age and longer-term shrinkage tests were performed on the locally produced UHPC. Thermal and shrinkage effects in normal strength concrete slabs overlaid with UHPC were also observed. Early-age shrinkage testing showed that approximately 55% of the strain occurred in the plastic state and may not contribute to bond stresses since the elastic modulus of the UHPC should be small at such early ages. Thickness of the substrate and amount of reinforcing steel were important factors for shrinkage in the slabs. The thickest slab experienced greater shrinkage than thinner slabs. Comparing this slab to a thinner slab with the same reinforcement indicated that reinforcement ratio is more important than the area of steel.

scholarly journals Seismic Resistant Bridge Columns with NiTi Shape Memory Alloy and Ultra-High-Performance Concrete

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadi Aryan
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Shape Memory Alloy ◽  
Shape Memory ◽  
High Performance ◽  
High Performance Concrete ◽  
Permanent Deformation ◽  
Bridge Columns ◽  
Ultra High Performance Concrete ◽  
Niti Sma ◽  
Column Design

Reinforced concrete bridge columns often endure significant damages during earthquakes due to the inherent deficiencies of conventional materials. Superior properties of the new materials such as shape memory alloy (SMA) and ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC), compared to the reinforcing steel and the normal concrete, respectively, are needed to build a new generation of seismic resistant columns. Application of SMA or UHPC in columns has been separately studied, but this paper aims to combine the superelastic behavior of NiTi SMA and the high strength of UHPC, in order to produce a column design with minimum permanent deformation and high load tolerance subjected to strong ground motions. Additionally, the excellent corrosion resistance of NiTi SMA and the dense and impermeable microstructure of UHPC ensure the long-term durability of the proposed earthquake resistant column design. The seismic performance of four columns, defined as steel reinforced concrete (S-C), SMA reinforced concrete (SMA-C), SMA reinforced UHPC (SMA-UHPC), and reduced SMA reinforced UHPC (R-SMA-UHPC) is analyzed through a loading protocol with up to 4% drift cycles. The use of NiTi SMA bars for the SMA reinforced columns is limited to the plastic hinge region where permanent deformations happen. All the columns have 2.0% reinforcement ratio, except the R-SMA-UHPC column that has a 1.33% reinforcement ratio to optimize the use of SMA bars. Unlike the S-C column that showed up to 68% residual deformation compared to peak displacement during the last loading cycle the SMA reinforced columns did not experience permanent deformation. The SMA-C and R-SMA-UHPC columns showed similar strengths to the S-C column, but with about 5.0- and 6.5-times larger ductility, respectively. The SMA-UHPC column showed 30% higher strength and 7.5 times larger ductility compared to the S-C column.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document