scholarly journals Critical selection of reliable reference genes for gene expression study in the HepaRG cell line

2011 ◽  
Vol 81 (10) ◽  
pp. 1255-1261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liesbeth Ceelen ◽  
Ward De Spiegelaere ◽  
Michael David ◽  
Jurgen De Craene ◽  
Mathieu Vinken ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1487-1494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Guo ◽  
Jia-xin Chen ◽  
Shu Yang ◽  
Xu-ping Fu ◽  
Zheng Zhang ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 451-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liesbeth Ceelen ◽  
Jurgen De Craene ◽  
Ward De Spiegelaere

Abstract BACKGROUND The HepaRG cell line is widely used as an alternative for primary human hepatocytes for numerous applications, including drug screening, and is progressively gaining importance as a human-relevant cell source. Consequently, increasing numbers of experiments are being performed with this cell line, including real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) experiments for gene expression studies. CONTENT When RT-qPCR experiments are performed, results are reliable only when attention is paid to several critical aspects, including a proper normalization strategy. Therefore, in 2011 we determined the most optimal reference genes for gene expression studies in the HepaRG cell system, according to the MIQE (Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments) guidelines. This study additionally provided clear evidence that the use of a single reference gene [glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), ribosomal protein S18 (RPS18), or actin, beta (ACTB)] was insufficient for normalization in HepaRG cells. Our screening of relevant studies published after our study suggested that the findings of our study were completely ignored. SUMMARY In none of the 24 reviewed studies was a proper normalization method used. Only 1 reference gene was included for normalization in 21 out of the 24 reported studies we screened, with RPS18 and GAPDH used most frequently, followed by hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 (HPRT1), glutathione synthetase (GSS) (hGus), β-2 microglobin (B2M), and acidic ribosomal phosphoprotein P0 (36B4). For 2 studies the use of multiple reference genes (2 and 3) was reported, but these had not been prevalidated for expression stability in HepaRG cells. In 1 study, there was no evidence that any reference gene had been used. Current RT-qPCR gene expression studies in HepaRG cells are being performed without adequate consideration or evaluation of reference genes. Such studies can yield erroneous and biologically irrelevant results.


Genes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 372
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Dunislawska ◽  
Anna Slawinska ◽  
Maria Siwek

The selection of a suitable reference gene assures a reliable gene expression analysis when using the qPCR method. Normalization of the reaction is based on the basic metabolism genes. These genes show a constant, unregulated expression in all cells and function throughout their lifetime. In the current study, seven reference gene candidates were screened using RT-qPCR, to determine the best-matched pair of reference genes in the chicken DT40 cell line. The DT40 was derived from bursal lymphoma cells that were subjected to RAV-1 bird retroviral infection. It is a simplified in vitro model that allows tracking the direct interaction of stimulants on the lymphoid population and profiling of the hepatocellular B cell transcriptome. The reference gene analysis was carried out using statistical tools integrating four independent methods—geNorm, Best Keeper, NormFinder, delta Ct and RefFinder. Based on the selected reference genes, the relative gene expression analysis was done using the ddCt method. Complete relative gene expression study on a panel of the target genes revealed that proper selection of reference genes depending on the tissue eliminate decreases in data quality. The SDHA and RPL4 genes constitute stable internal controls as reference genes when analyzing gene expression in the DT40 cell line.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 595-604
Author(s):  
Archana A. Naik ◽  
Chhaya H. Gadgoli ◽  
Arvind B. Naik

Background: Tubular calyx of flowers of Nyctanthes arbour-tristis contains an apocarotenoid crocin, a major constituent present in saffron stigma. The flowers of N. arbortristis are readily available, hence can be an economic substitute for saffron. Lutein from flowers of Tagetes patula, is another carotenoid which is a popular antioxidant. Objective: Oxidative stress is a major contributor to the process of aging. Carotenoids are powerful antioxidants. Hence, the study was carried out to evaluate anticollagenase activity and antielastase activity using gene expression study in Human dermal fibroblasts. Methods: Crocin was isolated from the tubular calyx of Nyctanthes arbortristis using flash chromatographic technique and lutein was isolated using column chromatography. Anticollagenase and antielastase activity of crocin and lutein were carried out using collagenase from Clostridium histolyticum as enzyme and porcine pancreatic elastase. Cytotoxicity of crocin and lutein was determined in Human Dermal Fibroblast cell line (HDF) through MTT assay. In gene expression study, the HDF Cell line was inoculated with Crocin (450 and 250 ppm) and lutein (100 and 50 ppm) separately for 24 hrs and the m-RNA expression levels of COL Type-1 and elastin were determined using RT-PCR. The results were compared with standards. Result: Crocin and lutein both showed inhibition of collagenase and elastase enzyme which are responsible for aging process. The cytotoxic concentration CTC 50 (ppm) for Crocin and lutein was found to be 790.2 ppm and 137.14 ppm. Gene expression study on crocin rich extract of Nyctanthes arbortristis showed upregulation of both collagen and elastin gene whereas lutein rich extract having concentration100 μg/ml showed up regulation by 0.02 fold and concentration 50 μg/ml showed down regulation. Conclusion: In vitro collagenase and elastase enzyme study and Gene expression study showed that these carotenoids are potential antiageing agents which can be substituted to synthetic cosmeceuticals as well as saffron.


2014 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise Zampieri ◽  
Luísa C. Nora ◽  
Vanessa Basso ◽  
Marli Camassola ◽  
Aldo J. P. Dillon

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakan Savlı ◽  
Sara Galimberti ◽  
Deniz Sünnetçi ◽  
Martina Canesastraro ◽  
Giuseppe Palumbo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document