TEM in situ observation of fracture behavior in ceramic materials

2005 ◽  
Vol 241 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 68-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ii ◽  
C. Iwamoto ◽  
K. Matsunaga ◽  
T. Yamamoto ◽  
Y. Ikuhara
2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (16) ◽  
pp. 162013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamaki Shibayama ◽  
Genichiro Matsuo ◽  
Kouichi Hamada ◽  
Seiichi Watanabe ◽  
Hirotatsu Kishimoto

2016 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 361-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zilan X. Lin ◽  
Zhi-Hui Xu ◽  
Yuehuei H. An ◽  
Xiaodong Li

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (19) ◽  
pp. 5794
Author(s):  
Suping Pan ◽  
Mingzhu Fu ◽  
Huiqun Liu ◽  
Yuqiang Chen ◽  
Danqing Yi

The plastic deformation processes and fracture behavior of a Ti–5Al–5Mo–5V–1Cr–1Fe alloy with bimodal and lamellar microstructures were studied by room-temperature tensile tests with in situ scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations. The results indicate that a bimodal microstructure has a lower strength but higher ductility than a lamellar microstructure. For the bimodal microstructure, parallel, deep slip bands (SBs) are first noticed in the primary α (αp) phase lying at an angle of about 45° to the direction of the applied tension, while they are first observed in the coarse lath α (αL) phase or its interface at grain boundaries (GBs) for the lamellar microstructure. The β matrix undergoes larger plastic deformation than the αL phase in the bimodal microstructure before fracture. Microcracks are prone to nucleate at the αp/β interface and interconnect, finally causing the fracture of the bimodal microstructure. The plastic deformation is mainly restricted to within the coarse αL phase at GBs, which promotes the formation of microcracks and the intergranular fracture of the lamellar microstructure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document