A method for the selection of auxotrophic mutants of the yeastSchizosaccharomyces pombe

1964 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 320-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Megnet
1969 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter S. Carlson

A method has been devised for the selection of auxotrophic mutants in higher plants. The method depends upon the incorporation of BUdR into the DNA of non-auxotrophic cells and upon its lack of incorporation into the DNA of auxotrophic cells. A wide range of auxotrophic types were recovered.


1987 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi TSUGE ◽  
Noriki HAYASHI ◽  
Syoyo NISHIMURA

1979 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 486-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Delgado ◽  
L. S. Herrera ◽  
C. Pérez ◽  
R. López

The determination of the best conditions for the application of the snail enzyme digestion method in the enrichment of auxotrophic mutants in Candida utilis was carried out following Box and Wilson's mathematical method. The selection procedure proposed was tested in the enrichment of auxotrophic mutants from a mutagenized culture of a wild-type strain. Mutant frequency was increased 46-fold by treatment with snail enzyme. The method also proved useful in the selection of additional auxotrophic mutations from single auxotrophs.


Science ◽  
1959 ◽  
Vol 129 (3348) ◽  
pp. 572-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. E. LESTER ◽  
S. R. GROSS

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gian Domenico Iannetti ◽  
Giorgio Vallortigara

Abstract Some of the foundations of Heyes’ radical reasoning seem to be based on a fractional selection of available evidence. Using an ethological perspective, we argue against Heyes’ rapid dismissal of innate cognitive instincts. Heyes’ use of fMRI studies of literacy to claim that culture assembles pieces of mental technology seems an example of incorrect reverse inferences and overlap theories pervasive in cognitive neuroscience.


1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 395-407
Author(s):  
S. Henriksen

The first question to be answered, in seeking coordinate systems for geodynamics, is: what is geodynamics? The answer is, of course, that geodynamics is that part of geophysics which is concerned with movements of the Earth, as opposed to geostatics which is the physics of the stationary Earth. But as far as we know, there is no stationary Earth – epur sic monere. So geodynamics is actually coextensive with geophysics, and coordinate systems suitable for the one should be suitable for the other. At the present time, there are not many coordinate systems, if any, that can be identified with a static Earth. Certainly the only coordinate of aeronomic (atmospheric) interest is the height, and this is usually either as geodynamic height or as pressure. In oceanology, the most important coordinate is depth, and this, like heights in the atmosphere, is expressed as metric depth from mean sea level, as geodynamic depth, or as pressure. Only for the earth do we find “static” systems in use, ana even here there is real question as to whether the systems are dynamic or static. So it would seem that our answer to the question, of what kind, of coordinate systems are we seeking, must be that we are looking for the same systems as are used in geophysics, and these systems are dynamic in nature already – that is, their definition involvestime.


1978 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 515-521
Author(s):  
W. Nicholson

SummaryA routine has been developed for the processing of the 5820 plates of the survey. The plates are measured on the automatic measuring machine, GALAXY, and the measures are subsequently processed by computer, to edit and then refer them to the SAO catalogue. A start has been made on measuring the plates, but the final selection of stars to be made is still a matter for discussion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document