Incidence and classification of adverse reactions to plasma substitutes

1982 ◽  
Vol 60 (17) ◽  
pp. 997-1002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Ring ◽  
Heinz Laubenthal ◽  
Konrad Meßmer
2001 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Celik ◽  
W. Krack ◽  
T. Zeiler ◽  
V. Kretschmer ◽  
S. Solinas ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Philip Wiffen ◽  
Marc Mitchell ◽  
Melanie Snelling ◽  
Nicola Stoner

Introduction to ADRs 14Classification of ADRs 15Adverse reactions: drug or disease? 16Helping patients understand the risk of ADRs 17Reporting ADRs 18Drug interactions 20Managing drug interactions 23Adverse drug reactions (ADRs), also known as ‘side effects’, ‘adverse drug events’, or ‘drug misadventures’, are a frequent cause of morbidity in hospital and the community. They have a significant cost both financially and in terms of quality of life. Few studies of ADRs have been carried out in the community so the effect on primary care is harder to assess, but studies in the hospital environment have shown the following. ...


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 336-344
Author(s):  
G. I. Syraeva ◽  
A. S. Kolbin ◽  
A. V. Matveev ◽  
V. S. Panezhina

The aim of the review article was to highlight the methodologies for assessing the financial costs of adverse drug reactions exemplified by the Russian Federation and Brazil.Materials and methods: for a comparative analysis, materials from open sources were used. The study of the experience of methods used for assessing the burden of adverse drug reactions, was carried out using the system for calculating payments for medical care by clinical-statistical and clinical-profile groups, the methodology for assessing the severity of adverse events of the US National Cancer Institute, drug-associated problems, and “the decision tree” model.Results. When comparing the costs of ADR management in the Russian Federation and Brazil, the following results have been obtained: in the Russian Federation, the “cost” of reaction can be estimated only for a limited number of nosological groups that are regulated by the classification of diseases by clinical and statistical groups; in Brazil, when predicting the costs of adverse reactions management, the combination of “the decision tree” method and the Delphi method is used. In the Russian Federation, the cost of the 3rd and above severity adverse event (according to CTCAE v. 4.03), varies from 26,849.22 up to 26,196.37 RUB in the North-West region (St. Petersburg). In Brazil, the cost of ADR ranges from 13 USD (the best scenario for the patient) to 574 USD (the worst scenario for the patient), which is about 975 and 43,000 RUB, respectively. The introduction of methods that make it possible to predict the development and potential outcomes of adverse drug reactions, as well as taking into account the experiences of foreign colleagues in their modeling, will reduce economic costs in the Russian Federation at the federal level.Conclusion: for the economic value analysis and further forecasting, an improvement of existing methodologies is required. The models used in the Russian Federation (“the decision tree”, classification of diseases by clinical groups, Markov model) do not take into account the time factor, therefore, when planning the analysis of potential costs for adverse reactions, it is necessary to reinforce the methods with such tools as QALY, YLL, and YLD.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Renate Viebahn-Hänsler ◽  
Olga Sonia Leon-Fernandez ◽  
Ziad Fahmy

Now that indications are clearly defined, applications have mostly become standardized and the active mechanisms have been well confirmed, medical ozone application in the form of the low-dose concept, is established and proven as a complementary medical method in the treatment of chronic inflammations or diseases associated with chronic inflammatory conditions. More than 11,000 systemic ozone treatments in the form of Major Ozone Autohemotherapy (MAH) in 577 patients and ? 47,000 Rectal Insufflations (RI) in 716 patients in various clinical studies are subjected to critical clinical assessment and classification according to the criteria of evidence-based medicine (EBM). Statistically significant clinical and/or pharmacological improvements without side-effects or adverse reactions are found in all studies; special attention is drawn to maintaining hygiene when working with blood and to the use of ozone-resistent and biocompatible materials. On summarizing the evidence classification under RCT + CT (Randomized Controlled Trials + Controlled Trials), i.e. Levels Ib and IIa, 12 studies with 657 ozone-treated patients are obtained for MAH and 6 studies with 227 patients for RI. As a result of the evidence here assessed, the two systemic ozone applications, MAH and RI are part of evidence-based medicine. Both applications are effective, safe and economic.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-6
Author(s):  
Amanda L. Cox ◽  
Scott H. Sicherer

Foods can induce adverse reactions by a variety of mechanisms. An understanding of the characteristic signs and symptoms and the related mechanisms of adverse food reactions allows the clinician to efficiently diagnose and treat patients. Adverse reactions to foods can be classified based on whether there is a nonimmunologic or immunologic basis for symptoms. Food intolerance, or a nonimmunologic reaction, includes a range of responses to foods that result primarily from an individual’s intrinsic inability to metabolize a component of the food, e.g., lactose sugar in dairy products. Other nonimmunologic adverse reactions may be attributed to food toxins or pharmacologic properties pharmacologic properties of foods themselves. Immunologic adverse reactions, in contrast, involve immune responses to food and are termed food allergy. Food allergy may further be categorized based on the underlying immunopathophysiology as immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated, non‐IgE mediated, or cell mediated. Some chronic allergic responses involve a combination of immune mechanisms. This review provides a general classification system for adverse food reactions and describes specific conditions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Sicong Li ◽  
Fang Liu ◽  
Kai Zhang ◽  
Yujia Tong ◽  
Xin Liu

As the spectrum of ophthalmic diseases keeps changing, uveitis has gradually become one of the major blinding eye diseases in the world. Although the efficacy and safety of adalimumab and other biological agents in the treatment of uveitis have been proved in clinical studies, no biological agents have been approved for the treatment of uveitis by Chinese National Medical Products Administration (NMPA). The quality of life and prognosis of uveitis patients are affected by the adverse reactions of currently available immunosuppressive drugs. In recent years, it has become a research hotspot to select effective components for uveitis treatment from natural drugs. Based on the classification of chemical structure, the therapeutic effect and mechanism of natural drug components on uveitis were discussed in detail, in order to provide reference for basic drug development and clinical research.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Polina Mamoshina ◽  
Blanca Rodriguez ◽  
Alfonso Bueno-Orovio

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document