The effects of psychomotor stimulants on single-spatial alternation behavior in dogs

1979 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc E. Risner ◽  
B. E. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Psychomotor Stimulants ◽  
Alternation Behavior ◽  
Spatial Alternation

Exploring the role of context-dependent hippocampal activity in spatial alternation behavior

Hippocampus ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 988-1002 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Ainge ◽  
Matthijs A.A. van der Meer ◽  
Rosamund F. Langston ◽  
Emma R. Wood
Keyword(s):  
Alternation Behavior ◽  
Spatial Alternation ◽  
Hippocampal Activity ◽  
Context Dependent

scholarly journals Contributions of dorsal striatal subregions to spatial alternation behavior

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 444-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Moussa ◽  
B. Poucet ◽  
M. Amalric ◽  
F. Sargolini
Keyword(s):  
Alternation Behavior ◽  
Spatial Alternation

Comparison of Alternation Behavior in Spatial and Non-Spatial Versions of the Sand Maze

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gretchen Hanson Gotthard ◽  
Dawn Carissan ◽  
David C. Riccio
Keyword(s):  
Alternation Behavior

Apomorphine Disrupts Discrete-Trial Delayed Spatial Alternation in Rats

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Kleier ◽  
Molly S. Griffith ◽  
Mark E. Bardgett
Keyword(s):  
Discrete Trial ◽  
Spatial Alternation

Stimulus-Change Effects of Forcing in Alternation Behavior

1966 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 515-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. N. Hughes
Keyword(s):  
Free Choice ◽  
Stimulus Change ◽  
Lower Degree ◽  
Alternation Behavior ◽  
Subsequent Removal ◽  
Transparent Barrier ◽  
Initial Attraction ◽  
High Degree

To test the hypothesis that forcing left or right in a T-maze produces more alternation because of the stimulus-change resulting from subsequent removal of the arm barrier, rats were given free-choice trials and forced trials with a wooden barrier (favouring a high degree of change) and with a transparent barrier (favouring a lower degree of change). Although alternation was unaffected by the three conditions, the percentage of first investigatory responses directed toward the alternate arm on Trial 2 was highest following forcing with the wooden barrier. It was concluded that a stimulus-change explanation for the effects of forcing was acceptable if these first investigatory responses were acknowledged as indices of initial attraction of attention by an arm.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document