scholarly journals Understanding addiction – mediators and moderators of behaviour change processes: an introduction

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (S1) ◽  
pp. S1-S3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Bühringer ◽  
Hans-Ulrich Wittchen
Keyword(s):  
Behaviour Change ◽  
Change Processes

scholarly journals A systematic review of the transtheoretical model of behaviour change and alcohol use

Psychologica ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-22
Author(s):  
Flaviane Bevilaqua Felicíssimo ◽  
Víviam Vargas Barros ◽  
Sabrina Maura Pereira ◽  
Natália Quintela Rocha ◽  
Lélio Moura Lourenço
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Alcohol Use ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
Behaviour Change ◽  
Stages Of Change ◽  
Transtheoretical Model ◽  
Readiness To Change ◽  
Change Processes ◽  
Processes Of Change ◽  
Change Assessment

Introdução: O estudo sobre o álcool tem aumentado em todo o mundo devido ao seu impacto social e econômico, e as doenças relacionadas ao uso de álcool estarem entre os distúrbios mais comuns de abuso de substâncias. Desta forma, faz-se necessário investigar os métodos mais eficazes e adequados de tratamento para diferentes populações. Método: Este trabalho analisou a literatura científica sobre o Modelo Transteórico de Mudança de Comportamento relacionados ao consumo de álcool. Foram consultadas as bases de dados Scopus, PubMed, PsycINFO, PepsiCo e Lilacs, utilizando os descritores transtheoretical model, transtheoretical approach, stages of change, processes of change e cycle of change cruzado com o descritor alcoholism, no período de dez anos (2001 a 2011). Principais resultados: A maioria das pesquisas encontradas utilizavam métodos longitudinais e quantitativos, além de uma prevalência no uso dos questionários Readiness to Change Questionnaire e University of Rhode Island Change Assessment utilizados na mensuração do ModeloTransteórico. Os resultados indicaram que outras variáveis podem influenciar o comportamento do indivíduo em relação à sua fase de mudança de comportamento e identificou problemas relacionados ao uso de álcool em pacientes que procuravam tratamento para outras condições de saúde. Esta constatação reforça a necessidade de práticas de triagens para a prevenção dos agravos relacionados ao uso de álcool.Implicações: O modelo Transteórico é importante no processo de mudança de comportamento, uma vez que permite a identificação dos estágios e a escolha de intervenções mais adequadas ao estágio do paciente, além de evitar que esforços sejam feitos na direção contrária à necessidade do usuário. Conclusão: Ressalta-se a necessidade de mais estudos na área, especialmente em relação às práticas de profissionais de saúde.

scholarly journals Developing and applying a framework to understand mechanisms of action in group-based, behaviour change interventions: the MAGI mixed-methods study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-162
Author(s):  
Aleksandra J Borek ◽  
Jane R Smith ◽  
Colin J Greaves ◽  
Fiona Gillison ◽  
Mark Tarrant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Behaviour Change ◽  
Group Processes ◽  
Mechanisms Of Action ◽  
Change Processes ◽  
Group Level ◽  
Behaviour Change Interventions ◽  
Group Sessions ◽  
Weight Loss Interventions

Background Theories and meta-analyses have elucidated individual-level mechanisms of action in behaviour change interventions. Although group-based interventions are commonly used to support health-related behaviour change, such interventions rarely consider theory and research (e.g. from social psychology) on how group-level mechanisms can also influence personal change. Objectives The aim was to enhance understanding of mechanisms of action in group-based behaviour change interventions. The objectives were to (1) develop a potentially generalisable framework of change processes in groups, (2) test the framework by analysing group session recordings to identify examples illustrating group processes and facilitation techniques and (3) explore links between group-level mechanisms and outcomes. Data sources In this mixed-methods study, the research team reviewed literature, conducted consultations and analysed secondary data (i.e. delivery materials and 46 audio-recordings of group sessions) from three group-based weight loss interventions targeting diet and physical activity: ‘Living Well Taking Control’ (LWTC), ‘Skills for weight loss Maintenance’ and ‘Waste the Waist’. Quantitative LWTC programme data on participant characteristics, attendance and outcomes (primarily weight loss) were also used. Methods Objectives were addressed in three stages. In stage 1, a framework of change processes in groups was developed by reviewing literature on groups (including theories, taxonomies of types of change techniques, qualitative studies and measures of group processes), analysing transcripts of 10 diverse group sessions and consulting with four group participants, four facilitators and 31 researchers. In stage 2, the framework was applied in analysing 28 further group sessions. In stage 3, group-level descriptive analyses of available quantitative data from 67 groups and in-depth qualitative analyses of two groups for which comprehensive quantitative and qualitative data were available were conducted to illustrate mixed-methods approaches for exploring links between group processes and outcomes. Results Stage 1 resulted in development of the ‘Mechanisms of Action in Group-based Interventions’ (MAGI) framework and definitions, encompassing group intervention design features, facilitation techniques, group dynamic and development processes, interpersonal change processes, selective intrapersonal change processes operating in groups, and contextual factors. In stage 2, a coding schema was developed, refined and applied to identify examples of framework components in group sessions, confirming the content validity of the framework for weight loss interventions. Stage 3 demonstrated considerable variability in group characteristics and outcomes and illustrated how the framework could be applied in integrating group-level qualitative and quantitative data to generate and test hypotheses about links between group mechanisms and outcomes (e.g. to identify features of more or less successful groups). Limitations The framework and examples were primarily derived from research on weight loss interventions, and may require adaptations/additions to ensure applicability to other types of groups. The mixed-methods analyses were limited by the availability and quality of the secondary data. Conclusions This study identified, defined, categorised into a framework and provided examples of group-level mechanisms that may influence behaviour change. Future work The framework and mixed-methods approaches developed provide a resource for designers, facilitators and evaluators to underpin future research on, and delivery of, group-based interventions. Funding This project was funded by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme, a Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research partnership.

scholarly journals What Drives Us to Walk: Understanding Components and Processes of Behaviour Change Towards Active Mobility

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Millonig
Keyword(s):  
Behaviour Change ◽  
Social Groups ◽  
Human Behaviour ◽  
Change Processes ◽  
Target Groups ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Selection Of

Walking is widely promoted as a healthy and sustainable way to get around. Still, although the benefits of walking are undisputed, it is equally known that most people walk much less than they could and should do. This article explores this discrepancy from the angle of human behaviour change processes and applies a theoretically grounded systematics for identifying the most important barriers against walking. This is followed by a description of behaviour types and related behaviour change motives to inspire strategies and arguments to address different types of target groups. The proposed framework can support the selection of measures and strategies to increase walking in different environments and addressing specific social groups.

scholarly journals Change Processes: Multi-Disciplinary Teamwork

2020 ◽  
pp. 129-143
Author(s):  
Louise Ackers ◽  
Gavin Ackers-Johnson ◽  
Joanne Welsh ◽  
Daniel Kibombo ◽  
Samuel Opio
Keyword(s):  
Behaviour Change ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Clinical Pharmacy ◽  
Change Processes ◽  
Professional Boundaries ◽  
Team Working ◽  
Poor Patient ◽  
Inappropriate Antibiotics ◽  
Multi Disciplinary Team

AbstractThis chapter examines the importance of multi-disciplinary team-working to the management of antimicrobial stewardship and behaviour change processes. MDT has played a major role in improving communication and reducing professional boundaries that had previously contributed to high levels of infection; extended use of, often inappropriate antibiotics and poor patient outcomes. The functioning of such teams facilitates the role of clinical pharmacy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document