Basic and clinical research on photodynamic therapy at Tokyo Medical University Hospital

2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 371-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Kato ◽  
J. Usuda ◽  
T. Okunaka ◽  
K. Furukawa ◽  
H. Honda ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7229-7229 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Usuda ◽  
H. Kato ◽  
T. Okunaka ◽  
K. Furukawa ◽  
H. Honda ◽  
...  

7229 Background: In central type early stage lung cancer, the tumor must be located only as far as the segmental bronchi and be carcinoma in situ or with only limited invasion into the bronchial wall. Laserphyrin (mono-L-aspartyl chlorine e6, NPe6) is a second generation photosensitize and approved by the Japanese government and has been on sale from June 2004. Methods: Four h after the administration of Laserphyrin 40 mg/m2, we irradiated using diode laser (100 mJ/cm2). Before PDT, we evaluated the tumor lesions and tumor depth using autofluorescence bronchoscopy and endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS), and we confirmed the area of laser irradiation. Results: From February 1980 to December 2005, a total number of 204 patients with 264 lesions of centrally located early stage lung cancer underwent photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tokyo Medical University Hospital. There were 185 clinical stage 0 lesions and 79 stage I lesions. CRs and PRs were obtained in 224 lesions (84.8%) and 40 lesions (15.2%) out of 264 lesions. From July 2004 to December 2005, we performed Laserphyrin-PDT for 28 lesions of centrally located early stage lung cancer in Tokyo Medical University Hospital. The rate of CR was 92.9% (26 lesions) in 28 lesions. For Laserphyrin-PDT, Skin photosensitivity was very low and the clean-up bronchoscopies were not frequently needed, and the period of hospitalization was shorter compared to that for Photofrin-PDT. Conclusions: We conclude that PDT using Laserphyrin will be a standard option for stage 0 (TisN0M0) and stage I (T1N0M0) centrally located early stage lung cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kayo Sugiyama ◽  
Toru Iwahashi ◽  
Nobusato Koizumi ◽  
Toshiya Nishibe ◽  
Toshiki Fujiyoshi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is a relatively rare condition that is often life-threatening. Secondary AEF is a complication of previous surgery, which can be more critical and challenging than primary AEF. The number of secondary AEF is increasing due to increase in the number of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Although TEVAR has become a successful alternative surgical strategy for thoracic aortic aneurysms, secondary AEF after TEVAR might be critical than other secondary AEF because of severe adhesion between the esophagus and residual thoracic aortic wall. Methods This study analyzed six patients with secondary AEF who were treated at Tokyo Medical University Hospital between 2011 and 2016. These participants included four patients who had undergone TEVAR and two who had undergone total arch replacement. Results Although they were subsequently hospitalized for a long period, open surgical repair was completed in two patients who had undergone total arch replacement. TEVAR alone was performed in two patients who had undergone TEVAR and they were discharged without major complications shortly. Combined repair of TEVAR as a bridge to open surgery was planned for two patients who had undergone TEVAR. However, reconstruction of the aorta and esophagus could not be completed in these patients due to severe adhesions, and they died during hospitalization. Conclusions Definitive open repair was successfully performed in patients with secondary AEF after total arch replacement. However, in the patients with secondary AEF after TEVAR, severe adhesion between the aorta and esophagus led to difficulty in performing a successful definitive open repair. The strategy for secondary AEF should, therefore, be decided considering the etiology of secondary AEF. In secondary AEF after TEVAR, definitive open repair is difficult to complete because of catastrophic complication, and palliative treatment using TEVAR without reconstruction of aorta and esophagus can be an alternative.


2009 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 415-422
Author(s):  
Atsushi Kawano ◽  
Michio Hazama ◽  
Akira Hagiwara ◽  
Nobuhiro Nishiyama ◽  
Sachie Kawaguchi ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kinya Furukawa ◽  
Tetsuya Okunaka ◽  
Hideki Yamamoto ◽  
Takaaki Tsuchida ◽  
Jitsuo Usuda ◽  
...  

Since 1980, advanced lung carcinomas were treated with palliative laser therapy for the purpose of opening the endobronchial stenosis and obstruction by either photodynamic therapy (PDT) or Nd-YAG laser treatment at Tokyo Medical University. A total of 258 lesions were treated, 81 by PDT and 177 by Nd-YAG laser treatment. PDT achieved effective results in 61 (75%) of 81 lesions. In the Nd-YAG laser group, 143 (81%) of 177 lesions showed effective results. When the tumor was located in the trachea or main bronchi, effective results were obtained in 73% (19 of 26) of cases treated by PDT and in 93% of cases (64 of 69) treated by Nd-YAG laser. However, in cases in which the tumor was located in lobar or segmental bronchi, the tumor response was effective in 76% (42 of 55) of PDT-treated patients and 73% (79 of 108) of Nd-YAG laser-treated patients. With a mortality rate of 0%, the greatest advantage of PDT over Nd-YAG treatment was safety. Considering complications, PDT seems to be useful for obstruction of lobar and segmental bronchus. Nevertheless, when deciding among alternative therapies, physicians treating patients with advanced lung carcinoma should give careful consideration to the benefit and complications of both laser therapies and decide the most suitable modality.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiko Umazume ◽  
Jun Suzuki ◽  
Yoshihiko Usui ◽  
Yoshihiro Wakabayashi ◽  
Hiroshi Goto

Purpose. Endogenous endophthalmitis (EE) is a rare ocular disease caused by bacterial or fungal infection of intraocular spaces by hematogenous spread of pathogens from distant infectious loci in the body. We investigated the clinical characteristics and management of eyes with EE in ten consecutive patients. Methods. Ten patients (10 eyes) with EE treated at Tokyo Medical University Hospital in 2014 were reviewed. We retrospectively studied the causative organisms, systemic complications, pre/postoperative mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and status of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD). Results. The 10 patients comprised 8 males and 2 females, with mean age of 71.2 years. The causative organisms were bacteria in 6 eyes and fungi in 4 eyes. Systemic complications included septicemia or disseminated intravascular coagulation in 5 patients and diabetes mellitus in 4 patients. Postoperative BCVA was improved by 0.2log⁡MAR or greater in 4 eyes and decreased in 4 eyes. Vitrectomy was performed in all eyes, and 4 required multiple surgeries. During vitrectomy, PVD was absent in 8 eyes, 4 of which showed retinal necrosis. The mean age of patients with no PVD was 71.2 years. Conclusion. Despite an advanced age, PVD was absent in the majority of patients with EE. PVD may be related to the pathogenesis and aggravation of EE.


2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harubumi Kato ◽  
Masahiko Harada ◽  
Shu Ichinose ◽  
Jitsuo Usuda ◽  
Takaaki Tsuchida ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kayo Sugiyama ◽  
Toru Iwahashi ◽  
Nobusato Koizumi ◽  
Toshiya Nishibe ◽  
Toshiki Fujiyoshi ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundAortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is a relatively rare condition that is often life-threatening. Secondary AEF is a complication of previous surgery, which can be more critical and challenging than primary AEF. The number of secondary AEF is increasing due to increase in the number of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Although TEVAR has become a successful alternative surgical strategy for thoracic aortic aneurysms, secondary AEF after TEVAR might be critical than other secondary AEF because of severe adhesion between the esophagus and residual thoracic aortic wall.MethodsThis study analyzed six patients with secondary AEF who were treated at Tokyo Medical University Hospital between 2011 and 2016. These participants included four patients who had undergone TEVAR and two who had undergone total arch replacement.ResultsAlthough they were subsequently hospitalized for a long period, open surgical repair was completed in two patients who had undergone total arch replacement. TEVAR alone was performed in two patients who had undergone TEVAR and they were discharged without major complications shortly. Combined repair of TEVAR as a bridge to open surgery was planned for two patients who had undergone TEVAR. However, reconstruction of the aorta and esophagus could not be completed in these patients due to severe adhesions, and they died during hospitalization.ConclusionsDefinitive open repair was successfully performed in patients with secondary AEF after total arch replacement. However, in the patients with secondary AEF after TEVAR, severe adhesion between the aorta and esophagus led to difficulty in performing a successful definitive open repair. The strategy for secondary AEF should, therefore, be decided considering the etiology of secondary AEF. In secondary AEF after TEVAR, definitive open repair is difficult to complete because of catastrophic complication, and palliative treatment using TEVAR without reconstruction of aorta and esophagus can be an alternative.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document