The impact of regulatory focus on affective responses to social discrimination

2006 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 421-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Sassenberg ◽  
Nina Hansen
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Focus ◽  
Affective Responses ◽  
Social Discrimination ◽  
The Impact

Earnouts in Acquisitions: The Impact of CEO Regulatory Focus

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viswa Prasad Gada ◽  
Lakshmi Goyal ◽  
Manish Popli
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Focus ◽  
The Impact

The Impact of Pathological Narcissism on Affect Following Social Rejection

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 691-707
Author(s):  
Scott Sasso ◽  
Nicole M. Cain ◽  
Kevin B. Meehan ◽  
Ruifan Zeng ◽  
Philip S. Wong
Keyword(s):  
Negative Affect ◽  
Social Rejection ◽  
Affective Responses ◽  
Pathological Narcissism ◽  
State Anger ◽  
Narcissistic Vulnerability ◽  
Interpersonal Difficulties ◽  
Amazon's Mechanical Turk ◽  
The Impact

Previous research has shown that narcissism is associated with interpersonal difficulties and maladaptive affective responses to social rejection. In the current studies, the authors examined two phenotypes of pathological narcissism, narcissistic grandiosity and narcissistic vulnerability, and their impact on individuals' affective responses in two distinctive social rejection paradigms. Participants from Study 1 (N = 239), recruited from a multicultural university and Amazon's Mechanical Turk, completed Cyberball, a computerized social rejection paradigm. Participants from Study 2 (N = 238) were recruited from a multicultural university and participated in an in vivo group rejection paradigm in a laboratory. Results indicated that following the rejection in both studies, narcissistic vulnerability positively predicted explicit negative affect and state anger. In addition, the positive relationship between narcissistic vulnerability and explicit negative affect was moderated by greater implicit negative affect in Study 2. The implications and limitations of these findings are discussed.

Speaking in the classroom: the impact of gender and affective responses on oral participation

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roseanne Russell ◽  
Rachel Cahill-O’Callaghan
Keyword(s):  
Affective Responses ◽  
Oral Participation ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Regulatory focus and generalized trust: the impact of prevention-focused self-regulation on trusting others

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Keller ◽  
Ruth Mayo ◽  
Rainer Greifeneder ◽  
Stefan Pfattheicher
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Focus ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Generalized Trust ◽  
The Impact

Impacts of regulatory focus and institutions on innovation

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 939-954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birton J. Cowden ◽  
Joshua S. Bendickson
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Focus ◽  
New Ventures ◽  
New Venture ◽  
Institutional Setting ◽  
Prevention Focus ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Institutional Settings ◽  
Cognitive Motivations ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Shed Light

Purpose Many factors influence entrepreneurs, some of which influence the level of innovation (i.e. innovative or imitative) of new products or services pursued. The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of the psychological motivations of the entrepreneurs and their institutional setting on the innovativeness of the new venture they pursue. Through this exploration, we can gain a better understanding of how innovative new ventures still occur in varying institutional environments. Design/methodology/approach In order to deliver the authors’ propositions as they pertain to innovation, the authors review the literature on entrepreneurs’ default regulatory focus (i.e. promotion or prevention seeking) and the strength of the institutions in which they are operating. Findings The authors theorize that promotion focus enhances innovativeness of ventures while prevention focus enhances imitativeness of ventures. The authors also provide a conceptual framework for the interplay among institutions and regulatory focus and provide a typology for how these varying combinations impact innovativeness or imitativeness of venture type. Originality/value In this study, the authors discuss and unpack the entrepreneurial mindset in order to bridge gaps between institutions and cognitive motivations of entrepreneurs as they pertain to innovativeness of venture type. By synthesizing several areas of research, the authors shed light on entrepreneurs’ innovativeness by proposing how these factors work together in determining whether an entrepreneur’s venture is more or less innovative based on regulatory disposition and in different institutional settings.

The Application of the Fuzzy Cognitive Map among Intravenous Drug Users

2015 ◽  
Vol 734 ◽  
pp. 428-434
Author(s):  
Qun Xiu Yu ◽  
Shou Ming Zhang ◽  
Gui Hong Bi ◽  
Chun Tao Wei
Keyword(s):  
Complex Network ◽  
Drug Users ◽  
Decision Rules ◽  
Cognitive Map ◽  
Independent Learning ◽  
Learning Ability ◽  
Fuzzy Cognitive Map ◽  
Social Discrimination ◽  
Individual Values ◽  
The Impact

This article carries on a research about spreading and imitating based on network modal of dynamic, complex and comparing various Agents. The Agent regarded as drug complex network nodes and combine Agent itself functions. Propose a dynamic complex network technology combined with Agent simulation model based on fuzzy cognitive map to study the spread of HIV. Using fuzzy cognitive map design with independent learning ability node agent based on personal emotion and cognition, agent considers the individual perception of the epidemic of surrounding environment, social discrimination, legal constraints strength, national testing and treatment, free needle exchange extrinsic and intrinsic factors in the environment of individual course, emotion, etc., Under the combined effect of individual values ​​derived drug fuzzy cognitive map. Develop individualized decision rules to circumvent virus. This article studied the impact of fuzzy cognitive and social discrimination and legal factors on HIV transmission.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document