scholarly journals Factors influencing productivity of eastern wild turkeys in northeastern South Dakota

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 8838-8854
Author(s):  
Reina M. Tyl ◽  
Christopher T. Rota ◽  
Chadwick P. Lehman
Keyword(s):  
South Dakota ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Wild Turkeys

Factors Influencing Stored-oat Insect Populations in South Dakota

1986 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 518-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Ingemansen ◽  
D. L. Reeves ◽  
R. J. Walstrom
Keyword(s):  
South Dakota ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Insect Populations

Pre-incubation movements of female wild turkeys relative to nest initiation in South Dakota

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 1062-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad P. Lehman ◽  
Lester D. Flake ◽  
Mark A. Rumble ◽  
Roger D. Shields ◽  
Dan J. Thompson
Keyword(s):  
South Dakota ◽  
Wild Turkeys ◽  
Nest Initiation

scholarly journals Multiple-Scale Roost Habitat Comparisons of Female Merriam's Wild Turkeys in the Southern Black Hills, South Dakota

2009 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-34
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Thompson ◽  
Mark A. Rumble ◽  
Lester D. Flake ◽  
Chad P. Lehman
Keyword(s):  
South Dakota ◽  
Multiple Scale ◽  
Black Hills ◽  
Wild Turkeys ◽  
Habitat Comparisons

Community Fisheries in Eastern South Dakota: Angler Demographics, Use, and Factors Influencing Satisfaction

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 254-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Greiner ◽  
David O. Lucchesi ◽  
Steven R. Chipps ◽  
Larry M. Gigliotti
Keyword(s):  
South Dakota ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Community Fisheries

Factors influencing adhesive bonding at the bone/implant interface

1992 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 1114-1115
Author(s):  
Julie A. Martini ◽  
Robert H. Doremus
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Adhesive Bonding ◽  
Microscopy Study ◽  
Electron Microscopy Study ◽  
Bone Implant ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Lr White ◽  
Transmission Electron ◽  
New Zealand White Rabbits ◽  
Scanning Electron

Tracy and Doremus have demonstrated chemical bonding between bone and hydroxylapatite with transmission electron microscopy. Now researchers ponder how to improve upon this bond in turn improving the life expectancy and biocompatibility of implantable orthopedic devices.This report focuses on a study of the- chemical influences on the interfacial integrity and strength. Pure hydroxylapatite (HAP), magnesium doped HAP, strontium doped HAP, bioglass and medical grade titanium cylinders were implanted into the tibial cortices of New Zealand white rabbits. After 12 weeks, the implants were retrieved for a scanning electron microscopy study coupled with energy dispersive spectroscopy.Following sacrifice and careful retrieval, the samples were dehydrated through a graduated series starting with 50% ethanol and continuing through 60, 70, 80, 90, 95, and 100% ethanol over a period of two days. The samples were embedded in LR White. Again a graduated series was used with solutions of 50, 75 and 100% LR White diluted in ethanol.

Factors Influencing Electrophysiologic Responsivity in Normal Adults

1965 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-347
Author(s):  
Robert Goldstein ◽  
Benjamin RosenblÜt
Keyword(s):  
Conditioned Stimulus ◽  
White Light ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Alpha Rhythm ◽  
White Women ◽  
White Men ◽  
Inverse Relation ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Electrodermal Responses ◽  
Normal Adults

Electrodermal and electroencephalic responsivity to sound and to light was studied in 96 normal-hearing adults in three separate sessions. The subjects were subdivided into equal groups of white men, white women, colored men, and colored women. A 1 000 cps pure tone was the conditioned stimulus in two sessions and white light was used in a third session. Heat was the unconditioned stimulus in all sessions. Previously, an inverse relation had been found in white men between the prominence of alpha rhythm in the EEG and the ease with which electrodermal responses could be elicited. This relation did not hold true for white women. The main purpose of the present study was to answer the following questions: (1) are the previous findings on white subjects applicable to colored subjects? (2) are subjects who are most (or least) responsive electrophysiologically on one day equally responsive (or unresponsive) on another day? and (3) are subjects who are most (or least) responsive to sound equally responsive (or unresponsive) to light? In general, each question was answered affirmatively. Other factors influencing responsivity were also studied.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document