Considering adjustment disorders as stress response syndromes for DSM-5

2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 818-823 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J. Strain ◽  
Matthew J. Friedman
2007 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 135-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Maercker ◽  
Franziska Einsle ◽  
Volker Köllner

Author(s):  
David E. Henley ◽  
Joey M. Kaye ◽  
Stafford L. Lightman

In the face of any threat or challenge, either real or perceived, an organism must mount a series of coordinated and specific hormonal, autonomic, immune, and behavioural responses that allow it to either escape or adapt (1–3). To be successful, the characteristics and intensity of the response must match that posed by the threat itself and should last no longer than is necessary. A response that is either inadequate or excessive in terms of its specificity, intensity or duration may result in one or more of a multitude of psychological or physical pathologies (2–5). This concept of threat and the organism’s response to it is frequently recognized and understood as ‘stress’ but is so diverse that it lacks a universally accepted definition (2) and thus is difficult to investigate or study (6). In the early 1900s, Walter Cannon introduced the concept of homoeostasis (4)—an ideal steady state for all physiological processes. Stress has been defined as the state where this ideal is threatened. More easily appreciated, however, are those factors, both intrinsic and extrinsic, which represent a challenge to homoeostasis (termed stressors) and the complex physiological, hormonal, and behavioural responses that occur to restore the balance, the stress response (1). The importance of endocrine systems in this stress response was emphasized by Hans Selye (7), who described the need for multiple, integrated systems to respond in a coordinated fashion following exposure to a particular stressor. Nonspecific activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) and sympatho-adrenomedullary (SAM) axes occurred following initial exposure to a noxious stimulus. Continued exposure to the same agent has been shown to have lasting and damaging effects on various endocrine, immune, and other systems, although recovery from this state was possible provided the stress was terminated (7). In addition to various noxious agents, numerous potential stressors exist including exertion, physical extremes, trauma, injury, and psychological stress. Indeed, psychological stressors are some of the most potent stimuli of the endocrine stress response particularly when they involve elements of novelty, uncertainty, and unpredictability. This has been highlighted by the observation that anticipating an event can be as potent an activator of the stress response as the event itself (7).


2017 ◽  
pp. S173-S185 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. TONHAJZEROVA ◽  
M. MESTANIK

The reactions of human organism to changes of internal or external environment termed as stress response have been at the center of interest during recent decades. Several theories were designed to describe the regulatory mechanisms which maintain the stability of vital physiological functions under conditions of threat or other environmental challenges. However, most of the models of stress reactivity were focused on specific aspects of the regulatory outcomes – physiological (e.g. neuroendocrine), psychological or behavioral regulation. Recently, a novel complex theory based on evolutionary and developmental biology has been introduced. The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress response employs a broad range of the findings from previous theories of stress and analyzes the responsivity to stress with respect to interindividual differences as a consequence of conditional adaptation – the ability to modify developmental trajectory to match the conditions of the social and physical environment. This review summarizes the contributions of the most important models in the field of stress response and emphasizes the importance of complex analysis of the psycho-physiological mechanisms. Moreover, it outlines the implications for nonpharmacological treatment of stress-related disorders with the application of biofeedback training as a promising tool based on voluntary modification of neurophysiological functions.


Author(s):  
Anahid Kabasakalian ◽  
Eric Hollander

The chapter considers past investigations of neuropeptides and their dysregulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and related conditions, and future directions for study. It reviews how the diagnostic reclassification of OCD in DSM-5, the stress response, reward mechanisms, as well as neuropsychological, functional imaging and genetic studies contribute to understanding of the role that neuropeptides have played in OCD and related areas. Avenues of further investigation are considered in the context of novel endogenous neuropeptides, newly identified roles for established neuropeptides, and the greater understanding of interactions between neuropeptides both with other neuropeptides and with neurotransmitters.


Author(s):  
Keith Rix

Sitting uncomfortably at the end or, as some might assert, off the end of the spectrum of mental disorder and in that grey area between normality and abnormality, adjustment disorders are already a challenge when they arise in legal settings. The challenge will be all the greater when reliance is placed on ICD-11 and DSM-5. This chapter analyzes cases from the civil and criminal jurisdictions to show the often pragmatic approaches taken by the courts in cases of adjustment disorder. These cases are used to suggest an approach as to how medical experts should report in cases where the diagnosis of adjustment disorder is an issue.


Author(s):  
Anne Doherty

The biological basis of adjustment disorders examines the evidence for the biological factors associated with this common diagnosis. Although adjustment disorder is usually characterized as a disorder of psychological adjustment to life stressors, and while it shares overlapping psychopathology with both normal stress response and with major depression, there is evidence that the diagnosis may have pathophysiological characteristics that distinguish it from both. This chapter explores the evidence supporting underlying theories derived from diverse fields including genetics, neuroimaging, and neuroendocrine and neurotransmitter functioning, and considers how the pharmacological management of adjustment disorder is linked to said theories. It discusses the gaps in our knowledge and considers the causes for the relative lack of interest in this diagnosis compared with other diagnoses.


2021 ◽  
pp. 313-319
Author(s):  
Froukje de Vries ◽  
Sarah Hales ◽  
Gary Rodin ◽  
Madeline Li

Adjustment disorder (AD) refers to a condition in which an individual reacts to an identifiable stressor with disproportionate symptoms and behaviors. It is now considered as a stress-related disorder in both the DSM-5 and ICD-11 and is the most commonly diagnosed psychiatric disorder in cancer patients. Nevertheless, this diagnosis remains problematic in terms of its conceptualization and evidence base. The specificity of the diagnostic criteria has been questioned and concern has been expressed that it medicalizes distress and increases the likelihood of unnecessary psychopharmacological interventions. However, evidence suggests that categorizing distress as AD may actually lead to appropriate interventions aimed at prevention or treatment. This chapter focuses on the validity and utility of the concept of and diagnostic criteria for AD and reviews the available evidence base regarding treatment of this disorder in cancer patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document