scholarly journals Induction of DNA damage signaling by oxidative stress in relation to DNA replication as detected using “click chemistry”

2011 ◽  
Vol 79A (11) ◽  
pp. 897-902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Zhao ◽  
Jurek Dobrucki ◽  
Paulina Rybak ◽  
Frank Traganos ◽  
H. Dorota Halicka ◽  
...  
Intervirology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 116-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
I-Hsiang Lai ◽  
Ching-Dong Chang ◽  
Wen-Ling Shih

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 884-898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronika Butin-Israeli ◽  
Stephen A. Adam ◽  
Nikhil Jain ◽  
Gabriel L. Otte ◽  
Daniel Neems ◽  
...  

Nuclear lamins play important roles in the organization and structure of the nucleus; however, the specific mechanisms linking lamin structure to nuclear functions are poorly defined. We demonstrate that reducing nuclear lamin B1 expression by short hairpin RNA-mediated silencing in cancer cell lines to approximately 50% of normal levels causes a delay in the cell cycle and accumulation of cells in early S phase. The S phase delay appears to be due to the stalling and collapse of replication forks. The double-strand DNA breaks resulting from replication fork collapse were inefficiently repaired, causing persistent DNA damage signaling and the assembly of extensive repair foci on chromatin. The expression of multiple factors involved in DNA replication and repair by both nonhomologous end joining and homologous repair is misregulated when lamin B1 levels are reduced. We further demonstrate that lamin B1 interacts directly with the promoters of some genes associated with DNA damage response and repair, includingBRCA1andRAD51. Taken together, the results suggest that the maintenance of lamin B1 levels is required for DNA replication and repair through regulation of the expression of key factors involved in these essential nuclear functions.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3114-3114
Author(s):  
Francesca Cottini ◽  
Teru Hideshima ◽  
Giovanni Tonon ◽  
Kenneth C. Anderson

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is a clonal proliferation of malignant plasma cells, carrying abnormal karyotypes, chromosomal translocations, and innumerous DNA copy-number variations. We and others have previously shown that MM cells have constitutive DNA damage and DNA damage response (DDR), while normal plasma cells (NPCs) are negative for these DDR markers. Moreover, we recently observed that markers of replicative stress, such as p-ATR and p-CHK1 together with RPA foci, are also present in MM cells. The MYC (or c-MYC) oncogene is pervasively altered in MM. Since MYC is associated with DNA replication stress, oxidative stress, and DDR, we explored whether MYC is implicated in these pathways in MM. Indeed, by analyzing various DNA damage gene expression signatures, we found a positive correlation between MYC levels and ongoing DNA damage. We next examined whether MYC modulation could alter replicative stress markers, and induce DNA double-strand breaks. In a gain-of-function model, c-MYC was expressed in U266 MM cell line, which has low c-MYC levels and importantly shows low levels of ongoing DNA damage. In parallel, the H929 and MM.1S MM cell lines were used to knock-down c-MYC expression. Re-expression of a functional MYC-EGFP in U266 cells induced replicative stress markers, such as RAD51, RPA, and phospho-CHK1 foci, as well as increased RAD51, RPA and phospho-CHK1 protein levels. To determine whether this phenotype was linked to concomitant oxidative stress, we incubated MM cells with an antioxidant reagent N-Acetylcysteine (NAC). We observed a modest reduction in replicative markers after NAC treatment, which was more evident by MYC overexpression. Taken together, these results suggest that the replicative stress induced by MYC is, at least in part, associated with oxidative stress. Additionally, MYC-EGFP positive U266 cells also show DNA damage, evidenced by appearance of phospho-H2A.X foci (which detect DNA double strand breaks), that in turn triggers an intense DNA damage response, assessed by phospho-ATM/phospho CHK2 positivity. In contrast, all these DDR markers were downregulated by MYC silencing, prior to cell death, in MM.1S and H929 MM cell lines. Finally, we examined whether targeting the replicative stress response may represent a novel therapeutic strategy in MM cells with high expression of MYC. Specifically, we treated U266 cells transduced with MYC or control LACZ cells, as well as MM.1S and H929 transfected with a specific MYC-shRNA or their scrambled shRNA controls, with a small molecule ATR inhibitor VE-821 which prevents proper DNA repair after DNA damage. Cells overexpressing MYC were significantly more sensitive to VE-821 treatment compared to controls; conversely MYC-silenced cells were more resistant to VE-821. These results suggest the potential utility of VE-821 as a novel therapeutic agent in cells with high expression of MYC. In conclusion, our data show that MYC may exert its oncogenic activity partly through its ability to trigger DNA replication stress, leading to DNA damage and genomic instability in MM cells. Given the pervasive deregulation of MYC present in MM cells, its role in DNA replication and DNA damage may correlate with the extensive genomic rearrangements observed in MM cells. Therefore, treatment strategies targeting this Achilles' heel may improve patient outcome in MM. Disclosures: Hideshima: Acetylon Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Anderson:Acetylon, Oncopep: Scientific Founder, Scientific Founder Other; Celgene, Millennium, BMS, Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


2016 ◽  
Vol 212 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Liu ◽  
Marcus B. Smolka

TOPBP1 is a key player in DNA replication and DNA damage signaling. In this issue, Moudry et al. (2016. J. Cell Biol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201507042) uncover a crucial role for TOPBP1 in DNA repair by revealing its requirement for RAD51 loading during repair of double strand breaks by homologous recombination.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 450-450
Author(s):  
Han Liu ◽  
Shugaku Takeda ◽  
Rakesh Kumar ◽  
Todd Westergard ◽  
Tej Pandita ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 450 Cell cycle checkpoints are implemented to safeguard our genome. Accordingly, checkpoint deregulation can result in human cancers. Although the S phase checkpoint plays an essential role in preventing genetic aberrations, the detailed molecular makeup of this signaling cascade, especially how it is executed in higher eukaryotes remains largely unknown. Human chromosome band 11q23 translocation disrupting the MLL gene leads to poor prognostic leukemias. MLL is a histone H3 lysine 4 methyl transferase that maintains HOX gene expression. The importance of HOX gene deregulation in MLL leukemogenesis has been intensively investigated. However, physiological murine MLL leukemia knockin models have indicated that incurred HOX gene aberration alone is insufficient to initiate MLL leukemia. Thus, additional signaling pathways must be involved, which remains to be discovered. Here, we demonstrate a novel function of MLL in executing the S phase DNA damage checkpoint response. We found that MLL was accumulated in the S phase upon DNA damage triggered by various agents including UV, ionizing radiation, etoposide, hydroxyurea and aphidocholin, which was observed in all of the cell lines examined including HeLa, 293T, NIH 3T3, and BJ-1 cells. During a normal cell cycle progression, MLL was recognized and degraded by the SCFskp2 proteasome in the S phase. Upon DNA damage, MLL was phosphorylated and thereby no longer recognized by SCFskp2, leading to its ultimate accumulation in the S phase. To determine the importance of DNA-damage induced MLL accumulation, we investigated whether MLL deficiency compromises S phase checkpoint in response to DNA damage. MLL knockout or knockdown cells displayed radioresistant DNA synthesis (RDS) and chromatid type genomic abnormalities (two hallmarks of S phase checkpoint defect). Using genetically well-defined mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), we identified ATR, but not ATM or DNA-PK, as the kinase required for the MLL accumulation. Furthermore, MLL with mutation of the ATR phosphorylation site failed to accumulate upon DNA damage and thus was unable to rescue the RDS and genomic instability phenotypes of MLL deficient cells. In summary, MLL is phosphorylated by ATR upon DNA damage, which disrupts its interaction with SCFskp2, leading to its accumulation in the S phase that is essential for the proper DNA damage checkpoint execution. We further dissected the mechanism by which MLL participates in the S phase checkpoint execution. We demonstrated that ATR -mediated phosphorylation of Chk1 remained intact in the absence of MLL, which positions MLL downstream to the DNA damage signaling cascade. CDC45 loading onto the replication origin constitutes the critical step of origin firing and thus ushers DNA replication - a step that is normally inhibited upon DNA damage signaling. Using co-immunoprecipitation and chromatin-immunoprecipitation assays, we demonstrated that S phase-accumulated MLL interacts with the MCM complex at the late replication origin, prevents the loading of CDC45, and thereby inhibits DNA replication. In other words, CDC45 was aberrantly loaded in the absence of MLL, which explains the observed RDS defects associated with the loss of MLL. To determine whether MLL leukemogenic fusions incur S phase checkpoint defects, we employed a MLL-CBP knockin mouse model. The RDS phenotype was observed in murine myeloid progenitor cells (MPCs) with haploinsufficiency of MLL. More importantly, MPCs expressing one knockin allele of MLL-CBP exhibited even greater S phase checkpoint defects, suggesting that MLL fusion further compromised DNA damage checkpoint. Taken together, our study establishes a previously unrecognized activity of MLL in direct inhibition of late origin firing upon DNA damage signaling, the deregulation of which may contribute to the pathogenesis of MLL leukemias. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document