Theoretical Chemistry: S. Shaik Honored / Coordination Chemistry: Prize for P. Arnold / Organic Chemistry: Awards for A. Deiters

2007 ◽  
Vol 46 (34) ◽  
pp. 6400-6400
Chemistry ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 759-776
Author(s):  
Edwin C. Constable ◽  
Catherine E. Housecroft

Chiral compounds have played an important role in the development of coordination chemistry. Unlike organic chemistry, where mechanistic rules allowed the establishment of absolute configurations for numerous compounds once a single absolute determination had been made, coordination compounds are more complex. This article discusses the development of crystallographic methods and the interplay with coordination chemistry. Most importantly, the development of the Flack parameter is identified as providing a routine method for determining the absolute configuration of coordination compounds.


2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 318-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katerina N. Lazarou ◽  
Iordanis Chadjistamatis ◽  
Vassilis Psycharis ◽  
Spyros P. Perlepes ◽  
Catherine P. Raptopoulou

1999 ◽  
Vol 71 (8) ◽  
pp. 1557-1585 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Salzer

Organometallic compounds are defined as containing at least one metal-carbon bond between an organic molecule, ion, or radical and a metal. Organometallic nomenclature therefore usually combines the nomenclature of organic chemisty and that of coordination chemistry. Provisional rules outlining nomenclature for such compounds are found both in Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry, 1979 and in Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry, 1990This document describes the nomenclature for organometallic compounds of the transition elements, that is compounds with metal-carbon single bonds, metal-carbon multiple bonds as well as complexes with unsaturated molecules (metal-p-complexes).Organometallic compounds are considered to be produced by addition reactions and so they are named on an addition principle. The name therefore is built around the central metal atom name. Organic ligand names are derived according to the rules of organic chemistry with appropriate endings to indicate the different bonding modes. To designate the points of attachment of ligands in more complicated structures, the h, k, and m-notations are used. The final section deals with the abbreviated nomenclature for metallocenes and their derivatives.ContentsIntroduction Systems of Nomenclature2.1 Binary type nomenclature 2.2 Substitutive nomenlcature 2.3 Coordination nomenclature Coordination Nomenclature3.1 General definitions of coordination chemistry 3.2 Oxidation numbers and net charges 3.3 Formulae and names for coordination compounds Nomenclature for Organometallic Compounds of Transition Metals 4.1 Valence-electron-numbers and the 18-valence-electron-rule 4.2 Ligand names 4.2.1 Ligands coordinating by one metal-carbon single bond 4.2.2 Ligands coordinating by several metal-carbon single bonds 4.2.3 Ligands coordinating by metal-carbon multiple bonds 4.2.4 Complexes with unsaturated molecules or groups 4.3 Metallocene nomenclature


ChemInform ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (38) ◽  
pp. no-no
Author(s):  
J. F. HAW ◽  
J. B. NICHOLAS ◽  
T. XU ◽  
L. W. BECK ◽  
D. B. FERGUSON

Vestnik RFFI ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 113-140
Author(s):  
Roman A. Novikov ◽  
Yury V. Tomilov

The main aspects of modern organic chemistry of the Group 13 elements – aluminum (Al), gallium (Ga), indium (In), and thallium (Tl) – are considered. Herewith, the main emphasis is placed on their use for the various carbonyl compounds activation in organic synthesis and reactions, which are specific for these elements. The 21th century marked a new era in the development of chemistry of the Group 13 elements; it is connected with the discovery of surprising and unexpected reactions and new compounds (primarily in the area of organic and coordination chemistry), defining various fields of these elements application.


1996 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 259-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F. Haw ◽  
John B. Nicholas ◽  
Teng Xu ◽  
Larry W. Beck ◽  
David B. Ferguson

2003 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 22-56
Author(s):  
K. V. Raman

Computer programming has been used effectively by theoretical chemists and organic chemists to solve various types of problem in chemistry. Initially the languages used for computations in chemistry were FORTRAN and BASIC. Later the Pascal language was used for solving problems in chemistry and physics. Recently the languages C and C++ and Java have been used to solve problems in chemistry. In this paper I will illustrate features of C, C++ choosing examples from chemistry. Computer programming has been used effectively by theoretical chemists and organic chemists to solve various types of problem in chemistry. Initially the languages used for computations in chemistry were FORTRAN and BASIC. Later the Pascal language was used for solving problems in chemistry and physics. Recently the languages C and C++ and Java have been used to solve problems in chemistry. In this paper I will illustrate features of C, C++ choosing examples from chemistry. Some examples presented in this these languages are Program to calculate reduced mass of homo diatomic or hetero diatomic Program to calculate the molecular weight of a tetra atomic system ABCD Program to calculate NMR frequencies of spin 1/2 nuclei only Program to calculate NMR and ESR frequencies The examples presented in Java 2 are Program to calculate unit cell dimension of a crystal Program to generate the chair form and boat form of cyclohexane. The examples presented in this monograph will help researchers in theoretical chemistry and organic chemistry to develop their own software.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document