Chapter 2 examines two paradigms for the Taiwan and Tibet question, namely realism and democracy. It provides a brief account of the general features of each paradigm and outlines the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. It questions some presuppositions of the two intellectual frameworks through which scholars study Taiwan and Tibet and political actors propose various solutions to the Taiwan and Tibet question. The chapter introduces and employs Eric Wright’s “real utopian” approach, which combines both normative and empirical thinking, and considers the conditions under which various democratic solutions to the Taiwan and Tibet question are proposed and attempted. Moving back and forth between realism and democracy, the book develops a methodologically reflective equilibrium, which continues throughout the book.