In the autumn of 2010 the editors of this volume ran a seminar within a summer school organized by the Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes in the French Maritime Alps. The aim of that seminar was a comparative assessment of the various ‘restatements’, ‘model laws’, ‘reference texts’, or ‘non-legislative codifications’ on European contract law that had by then been published. That assessment turned out to be much more interesting than we had originally envisaged, for we discovered that those texts were genetically related in unexpectedly complex ways. We had known before, of course, that some rules and formulations in later texts had been taken over or adapted from older texts and that a number of the restatements were also connected to the European Union’s acquis communautaire. But we had not been aware of the extent to which the texts were interrelated; nor had we appreciated the changes of wording and systematic context that had occurred. The mixture of complex genetic relationships, of correspondence and differences in formulation, and of shifts in approach and policy thus became more interesting, but also more difficult to understand.