Major vascular injury during laparoscopy

Major Vascular injury during laparoscopy is most deadly complication of laparoscopy. This report is review major vascular injuries based on surgeon’s relation and literature. The incidence of MVI is 0,04–0,1%. Extremely important is to learn proper technique of insuflation. According to patient’s physique surgeon should consider best technique of insuflation, take caution against slim people, and induct implements with proper angle. We should avoid excesive force during trocar and Verres’s needle insertion, we also should avoid redundant movement after Verres needle is inserted in abdomen cavity. Elevation of the anterior abdominal wall at the time of Veress or primary trocar insertion is routinely recomended. Major vascular injury is seriously underestimated problem of laparoscopic operations.

Major vascular injury during laparoscopy

Major Vascular injury during laparoscopy is most deadly complication of laparoscopy. This report is review major vascular injuries based on surgeon’s relation and literature. The incidence of MVI is 0,04 % - 0,1 %. Extremely important is to learn proper technique of insuflation. According to patient’s physique surgeon should consider best technique of insuflation, take caution against slim people, and induct implements with proper angle. We should avoid excesive force during trocar and Verres’s needle insertion, we also should avoid redundant movement after Verres needle is inserted in abdomen cavity. Elevation of the anterior abdominal wall at the time of Veress or primary trocar insertion is routinely recomended. Major vascular injury is seriously underestimated problem of laparoscopic operations.

Port site complications following laparoscopic surgeries: a prospective study

Background: Port site complications are bothersome complications which undermine the benefits of minimal invasive surgery, not only does it add to the morbidity of the patient but also spoil the reputation of the surgeon. Aims and objective of the study was to determine the morbidity associated with the port site complications in laparoscopic surgery and to identify risk factors for complications.Methods: Three hundred patients having age between 15-50 years admitted for elective laparoscopic procedure were studied. All the patients had preoperative workup and general anaesthesia was given with endotracheal intubation. The patients were observed for any port-site complication during operation and in the immediate and postoperative till three months.Results: Female preponderance (77.34%) was observed with maximum patients belonging to age group of 41-50 years (31.7%). Majority of the patients were in the BMI range of 18.5-25kg/m2 (53.33%). In 54.66% and45.33% patients Verres needle and Hasson’s (Open) method was used to create pneumoperitoneum. Cholecystectomy was the indication in 80% patients. Port site morbidity was observed in 8.67% patients. As an early port site complication, bleeding, surgical site infection, emphysema and visceral injury was observed in 6, 8, 4 and 1 patient respectively. As a late port site complication, 4 and 3 patients developed hernia and hypertrophic scar respectively.Conclusions: Port site complications are least in elective laparoscopic surgery.

Initial experience with single-port robotic hysterectomy

ABSTRACT Objective: This article presents the first series of robotic single-port hysterectomy cases performed at a hospital in Brazil. Methods: From November 2014 to October 2016, 11 patients were indicated to undergo, and nine of them were submitted to single-port hysterectomy using da Vinci Single-Site® platform. However, in two patients, due to multiple previous abdominal surgeries, large uterine volume, and/or a uterus with no mobility, a pneumoperitoneum was performed with a Verres needle, and the pelvic cavity was assessed using a 5mm optics endoscope. In these cases, single-port surgery was not recommended; therefore, multiportal robotic access was chosen, and no intercurrent events were reported. Nine single-port cases were operated on by the same surgeon at Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. Patient data analyzed included age, body mass index, previous surgeries, and clinical diagnosis. Surgical data included operative time, skin incision, report of intraoperative complications, need for conversion to laparotomy, need for transfer to intensive care unit, need for blood transfusion, inadvertent injury to other organs, length of hospital stay, and death. Results: All cases were completed with da Vinci Single-Site® system, with no intercurrent events. Four patients presented with adenomyosis as the surgical indication, two had uterine myoma, one endometrial cancer, one endometrial polyp, and one desquamative inflammatory vaginitis. The mean age of patients was 44 years (range, 40 to 54 years), and body mass index varied between 23.4 and 33.2kg/m2 (mean 26.4). No complications occurred in any of the cases, such as intestinal or bladder injury, bleeding, or the need for a second surgery. All nine procedures were completed with the robotic single-port access, and no patient required a blood transfusion. Conclusion: Although this study merely presented an initial series of patients submitted to robotic single-port surgery, it demonstrated that the method is feasible and safe, suggesting the possible use of this technique in elective hysterectomy and other gynecological procedures in the future, as described in large reference centers of advanced surgery worldwide. Specifically, in gynecological practice, existing evidence on the use of robot-assisted, single-port surgery seems promising, and although it is not indicated in all cases, it should be considered as a surgical option. Nonetheless, further randomized and controlled clinical studies are necessary to establish the preeminence of robot-assisted, single-port surgery versus single-incision and conventional laparoscopy.

Establishing pneumoperitoneum: Verres or Hasson? The debate continues

INTRODUCTION The technique of establishing pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery remains contentious, with various different techniques available and each having its own advocates. The Verres needle approach has attracted much criticism and is seen to entail more risk, but is this view justified in the era of evidence-based medicine? PATIENTS AND METHODS Over a 6-year period, a prospective study was undertaken of 3126 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery performed by two upper gastrointestinal surgeons. One surgeon preferred the Verres needle and the other an open technique. A database was created of all cases and complication rates of the different techniques ascertained. RESULTS Peri-umbilical Verres needle was used in 1887 cases (60.4%) with two complications encountered, both of which were colonic injuries, with an incidence of 0.1%. Open port insertion was used in 1200 cases (38.4%) with one complication, a small bowel perforation, to give an incidence of 0.08%. The Verres needle was used in alternative positions in 22 cases (0.75%) and, when used in the left upper quadrant (19 cases), there was one complication, a left hepatic lobe puncture, with an incidence of 5.26%. Our overall incidence of intra-abdominal injury was 0.13%, all in patients who had undergone previous abdominal surgery, and in the subgroup of patients with previous surgery the rate was 0.78%. There was no mortality. CONCLUSIONS Practice varies as to the method chosen to induce pneumoperitoneum, but our results show there is no significant difference between the technique chosen and incidence of complications, and this is supported in the literature.