Potensi Usaha Ternak Sapi Bali Terintegrasi Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit Di Kecamatan Wiwirano Kabupaten Konawe Utara

Kecamatan Wiwirano merupakan Kecamatan di Kabupaten Konawe Utara, yang memiliki potensi untuk pengembangan usaha sapi Bali yang terintegrasi dengan perkebunan kelapa sawit. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui potensi usaha ternak sapi Bali terintegrasi perkebunan kelapa sawit di Kecamatan Wiwirano Kabupaten KonaweUtara. Penentuan lokasi dilakukan secara sengaja (Proposive Sampling) dengan memilih Kecamatan Wiwirano. Sampel responden diambil secara acak sederhana dari 4 desa sebanyak 60 responden. Variabel yang diukur adalah potensi usaha ternak sapi Baliberdasarkan sumber daya alam, sumber daya manusia fasilitas fisik dan non fisik menggunakan matriks internal factory analysis summery (IFAS), matriks external factory analysis summery (EFAS) matriks internal external (IE) dan matriks strength weakness oppourtunity threats (SWOT). Hasil penelitian menujukkan bahwa usaha ternak sapi bali potensial untuk dikembangkan di Kecamatan Wiwirano dengan SWOT nilai matrik IFAS yaitu (2,96>1,0) stabil, nilai EFAS yaitu (2,67>1,0) sehingga disimpulkan bahwa Kecamatan Wiwirano dikategorikan sebagai wilayah yang berpotensi pengembangan usaha ternak sapi Bali terintegrasi perkebunan kelapa sawit.

Autocracy and the Factory Order In Early Russian Industrialization

The Tsarist government played an important and fateful role in the development of the relationship between workers and employers in the early stages of Russian industrialization. Although the general character of this role is well known to historians, further study and reexamination of Tsarist labor policy, in the light of the contemporary concern with economic development, is invited by the Soviet publication in recent years of documentary evidence on nineteenth century labor problems. An attempt will be made in this article to integrate some of the new evidence with data from earlier sources in an analysis of the methods used by the Tsarist government to cope with the problem posed by internal government of industry in an era of growing labor unrest. It will focus on the period between the Emancipation and the 1905 Revolution. Russia did not become an industrial state during this period, but industry made enough progress to bring the country face to face with the modern labor problem. It was a period in which social and economic relations, rooted in feudal traditions, began to undergo significant changes in response to industrial growth. Labor unrest and protest are one of the chief symptoms of the problems inherent in this socio-economic readjustment. To understand the Tsarist approach to these problems it will be necessary to begin with a brief outline of the social milieu of Russian industrialization and of the governmental attitude toward industrial discipline and unrest before the Emancipation. The second section of the article covers the period between the Emancipation and the mideighties, during which the government did not formally regulate the internal order of the factory but was not unconcerned with the relations between employers and workers. The third section covers the period after 1886, when the internal factory order was subject to formal regulation and official inspection.