otolith stimulation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

24
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 0)

NeuroImage ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 155 ◽  
pp. 50-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ertl ◽  
M. Moser ◽  
R. Boegle ◽  
J. Conrad ◽  
P. zu Eulenburg ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (8) ◽  
pp. e75-e76
Author(s):  
M. Ertl ◽  
M. Moser ◽  
M. Dieterich

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (7) ◽  
pp. 2062-2077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torin K. Clark ◽  
Michael C. Newman ◽  
Charles M. Oman ◽  
Daniel M. Merfeld ◽  
Laurence R. Young

Hypergravity provides a unique environment to study human perception of orientation. We utilized a long-radius centrifuge to study perception of both static and dynamic whole body roll tilt in hypergravity, across a range of angles, frequencies, and net gravito-inertial levels (referred to as G levels). While studies of static tilt perception in hypergravity have been published, this is the first to measure dynamic tilt perception (i.e., with time-varying canal stimulation) in hypergravity using a continuous matching task. In complete darkness, subjects reported their orientation perception using a haptic task, whereby they attempted to align a hand-held bar with their perceived horizontal. Static roll tilt was overestimated in hypergravity, with more overestimation at larger angles and higher G levels, across the conditions tested (overestimated by ∼35% per additional G level, P < 0.001). As our primary contribution, we show that dynamic roll tilt was also consistently overestimated in hypergravity ( P < 0.001) at all angles and frequencies tested, again with more overestimation at higher G levels. The overestimation was similar to that for static tilts at low angular velocities but decreased at higher angular velocities ( P = 0.006), consistent with semicircular canal sensory integration. To match our findings, we propose a modification to a previous Observer-type canal-otolith interaction model. Specifically, our data were better modeled by including the hypothesis that the central nervous system treats otolith stimulation in the utricular plane differently than stimulation out of the utricular plane. This modified model was able to simulate quantitatively both the static and the dynamic roll tilt overestimation in hypergravity measured experimentally.


2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (03) ◽  
pp. 143-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen M. McNerney ◽  
Alan H. Lockwood ◽  
Mary Lou Coad ◽  
David S. Wack ◽  
Robert F. Burkard

Background: The vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) is a myogenic response that can be used clinically to evaluate the function of the saccule. However, to date, little is known about the thalamo-cortical representation of saccular activation. It is important to understand all aspects of the VEMP, as this test is currently used clinically in the evaluation of saccular function. Purpose: To identify the areas of the brain that are activated in response to stimuli used clinically to evoke the VEMP. Research Design: Electroencephalography (EEG) recordings combined with current density analyses were used to identify the areas of the brain that are activated in response to stimuli presented above VEMP threshold (500 Hz, 120 dB peak SPL [pSPL] tone bursts), as compared to stimuli presented below VEMP threshold (90 dB pSPL, 500 Hz tone bursts). Ten subjects without any history of balance or hearing impairment participated in the study. Results: The neural otolith-evoked responses (NOERs) recorded in response to stimuli presented below VEMP threshold were absent or smaller than NOERs that were recorded in response to stimuli presented above VEMP threshold. Subsequent analyses with source localization techniques, followed by statistical analysis with SPM5 (Statistical Parametric Mapping), revealed several areas that were activated in response to the 120 dB pSPL tone bursts. These areas included the primary visual cortex, the precuneus, the precentral gyrus, the medial temporal gyrus, and the superior temporal gyrus. Conclusions: The present study found a number of specific brain areas that may be activated by otolith stimulation. Given the findings and source localization techniques (which required limited input from the investigator as to where the sources are believed to be located in the brain) used in the present study as well as the similarity in findings between studies employing galvanic stimuli, fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging), and scalp-recorded potentials in response to VEMP-eliciting stimuli, our study provides additional evidence that these brain regions are activated in response to stimuli that can be used clinically to evoke the VEMP.


2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 569-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. A. Vorob’ev ◽  
S. D. Chistov ◽  
T. A. Rybachenko

Neuroscience ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 155 (3) ◽  
pp. 771-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Ventre-Dominey ◽  
M. Luyat ◽  
P. Denise ◽  
C. Darlot

2007 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. e15-e16
Author(s):  
S. Bense ◽  
P. Schlindwein ◽  
M. Müller ◽  
T. Bauermann ◽  
T. Brandt ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 37 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Bense ◽  
P Schlindwein ◽  
M Müller ◽  
T Bauermann ◽  
T Brandt ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document