oddity discrimination
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

11
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 13-23
Author(s):  
Abu Bokor Siddik ◽  
Najjeda Nahar

We investigated the formation of oddity concept in human subjects by means of multiple oddity discrimination tasks. Four human subjects were concurrently trained to discriminate an odd object from three identical objects in a row where the former one was reinforced. Discrimination tasks were gradually increased (e.g. 12 oddity tasks, 30 oddity tasks). Two out of four human subjects rapidly learned the acquisition tasks with higher accuracy rate suggesting that they seemed to avoid responding based on the strategy of the item-specific learning and to adopt relational processing. This assumption was stronger when robust transfer of learning with higher accuracy in baseline training performances was showed by them in transfer test 1 and transfer test 2. Although these findings offer evidence of relational oddity learning in humans, the possibility of the effect of stimulus generalization and the sense of perceptual oddity could not be excluded.


2017 ◽  
Vol 140 ◽  
pp. 6-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tohru Taniuchi ◽  
Ryohei Miyazaki ◽  
Md. Abu Bokor Siddik

PeerJ ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. e3209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasia Giannakopoulou ◽  
Helen Brown ◽  
Meghan Clayards ◽  
Elizabeth Wonnacott

BackgroundHigh talker variability (i.e., multiple voices in the input) has been found effective in training nonnative phonetic contrasts in adults. A small number of studies suggest that children also benefit from high-variability phonetic training with some evidence that they show greater learning (more plasticity) than adults given matched input, although results are mixed. However, no study has directly compared the effectiveness of high versus low talker variability in children.MethodsNative Greek-speaking eight-year-olds (N= 52), and adults (N= 41) were exposed to the English /i/-/ɪ/ contrast in 10 training sessions through a computerized word-learning game. Pre- and post-training tests examined discrimination of the contrast as well as lexical learning. Participants were randomly assigned to high (four talkers) or low (one talker) variability training conditions.ResultsBoth age groups improved during training, and both improved more while trained with a single talker. Results of a three-interval oddity discrimination test did not show the predicted benefit of high-variability training in either age group. Instead, children showed an effect in thereversedirection—i.e., reliably greater improvements in discrimination following single talker training, even for untrained generalization items, although the result is qualified by (accidental) differences between participant groups at pre-test. Adults showed a numeric advantage for high-variability but were inconsistent with respect to voice and word novelty. In addition, no effect of variability was found for lexical learning. There was no evidence of greater plasticity for phonetic learning in child learners.DiscussionThis paper adds to the handful of studies demonstrating that, like adults, child learners can improve their discrimination of a phonetic contrast via computerized training. There was no evidence of a benefit of training with multiple talkers, either for discrimination or word learning. The results also do not support the findings of greater plasticity in child learners found in a previous paper (Giannakopoulou, Uther & Ylinen, 2013a). We discuss these results in terms of various differences between training and test tasks used in the current work compared with previous literature.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasia Giannakopoulou ◽  
Helen Brown ◽  
Meghan Clayards ◽  
Elizabeth Wonnacott

Background. High talker variability (i.e. multiple voices in the input) has been found effective in training non-native phonetic contrasts in adults. A small number of studies suggest that children also benefit from high-variability phonetic training with some evidence that they show greater learning (more plasticity) than adults given matched input, although results are mixed. However no study has directly compared the effectiveness of high versus low talker variability in children. Methods. Native Greek speaking 8-year-olds (N=52), and adults (N=41) were exposed to the English /i/-/ɪ/ contrast in ten training sessions through a computerized word-learning game. Pre- and post-training tests examined discrimination of the contrast as well as lexical learning. Participants were randomly assigned to high (4 talkers) or low (1 talker) variability training conditions. Results. Both age groups improved during training, and both improved more while trained with a single talker. Results of a 3-interval oddity discrimination test did not show the predicted benefit of high-variability in training in either age group. Instead, children showed an effect in the reverse direction – i.e. reliably greater improvements in discrimination following single talker training, even for untrained generalization items, although the result is qualified by (accidental) differences in participant groups at pre-test. Adults showed a numeric advantage for high-variability but were inconsistent with respect to voice and word novelty. In addition, no effect of variability was found for lexical learning. There was no evidence of greater plasticity for phonetic learning in child learners. Discussion. This paper adds to the handful of studies demonstrating that, like adults, child learners can improve their discrimination of a phonetic contrast via computerized training. There was no evidence of a benefit of training with multiple talkers, either for discrimination or word learning. The results also do not support the findings of greater plasticity in child learning found in a previous paper (Giannakopoulou et al., 2013a). We discuss these results in terms of various differences between training and test tasks used in the current work compared with previous literature.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasia Giannakopoulou ◽  
Helen Brown ◽  
Meghan Clayards ◽  
Elizabeth Wonnacott

Background. High talker variability (i.e. multiple voices in the input) has been found effective in training non-native phonetic contrasts in adults. A small number of studies suggest that children also benefit from high-variability phonetic training with some evidence that they show greater learning (more plasticity) than adults given matched input, although results are mixed. However no study has directly compared the effectiveness of high versus low talker variability in children. Methods. Native Greek speaking 8-year-olds (N=52), and adults (N=41) were exposed to the English /i/-/ɪ/ contrast in ten training sessions through a computerized word-learning game. Pre- and post-training tests examined discrimination of the contrast as well as lexical learning. Participants were randomly assigned to high (4 talkers) or low (1 talker) variability training conditions. Results. Both age groups improved during training, and both improved more while trained with a single talker. Results of a 3-interval oddity discrimination test did not show the predicted benefit of high-variability in training in either age group. Instead, children showed an effect in the reverse direction – i.e. reliably greater improvements in discrimination following single talker training, even for untrained generalization items, although the result is qualified by (accidental) differences in participant groups at pre-test. Adults showed a numeric advantage for high-variability but were inconsistent with respect to voice and word novelty. In addition, no effect of variability was found for lexical learning. There was no evidence of greater plasticity for phonetic learning in child learners. Discussion. This paper adds to the handful of studies demonstrating that, like adults, child learners can improve their discrimination of a phonetic contrast via computerized training. There was no evidence of a benefit of training with multiple talkers, either for discrimination or word learning. The results also do not support the findings of greater plasticity in child learning found in a previous paper (Giannakopoulou et al., 2013a). We discuss these results in terms of various differences between training and test tasks used in the current work compared with previous literature.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasia Giannakopoulou ◽  
Helen Brown ◽  
Meghan Clayards ◽  
Elizabeth Wonnacott

Background. High talker variability (i.e. multiple voices in the input) has been found effective in training non-native phonetic contrasts in adults. A small number of studies suggest that children also benefit from high-variability phonetic training with some evidence that they show greater learning (more plasticity) than adults given matched input, although results are mixed. However no study has directly compared the effectiveness of high versus low talker variability in children. Methods. Native Greek speaking 8-year-olds (N=52), and adults (N=41) were exposed to the English /i/-/ɪ/ contrast in ten training sessions through a computerized word-learning game. Pre- and post-training tests examined discrimination of the contrast as well as lexical learning. Participants were randomly assigned to high (4 talkers) or low (1 talker) variability training conditions. Results. Both age groups improved during training, and both improved more while trained with a single talker. Results of a 3-interval oddity discrimination test did not show the predicted benefit of high-variability in training in either age group. Instead, children showed an effect in the reverse direction – i.e. reliably greater improvements in discrimination following single talker training, even for untrained generalization items, although the result is qualified by (accidental) differences in participant groups at pre-test. Adults showed a numeric advantage for high-variability but were inconsistent with respect to voice and word novelty. In addition, no effect of variability was found for lexical learning. There was no evidence of greater plasticity for phonetic learning in child learners. Discussion. This paper adds to the handful of studies demonstrating that, like adults, child learners can improve their discrimination of a phonetic contrast via computerized training. There was no evidence of a benefit of training with multiple talkers, either for discrimination or word learning. The results also do not support the findings of greater plasticity in child learning found in a previous paper (Giannakopoulou et al., 2013a). We discuss these results in terms of various differences between training and test tasks used in the current work compared with previous literature.


Author(s):  
Rosane Silveira

The present research is an investigation of the role played by pronunciation instruction in the discrimination of English CVC and CVCV syllabic patterns in word-final position. The participants of this study were two groups of Brazilian learners (beginners): the control group (10 students), and the experimental group (12 students). Both groups were given a discrimination pretest and posttest, between which the experimental group received instruction based on a pronunciation manual with activities focused on the English syllable and word-final consonants, whereas the control group received no such instruction. The pre and posttests consisted of an oddity discrimination test, in which the participants had to discriminate between the CVC and CVCV syllabic patterns. The posttest results showed somewhat greater improvement for the experimental group than for the control group, but this difference was not statistically significant.


1977 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl F. Schaefer ◽  
C. G. Gunn ◽  
Kurt M. Dubowski

Information processing was tested in 12 male subjects after smoking marihuana containing 0, 10, or 20 mg. of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in three consecutive experimental sessions according to a Latin square protocol. Successful dose control was indicated both by the dose-related linear increase observed in heart rate and by preliminary assays of THC metabolites excreted in the urine. During tachistoscopic presentation of varying numbers of circles, statistically significant decrements in information processing occurred as a function of THC dosage. However, adding irrelevant information (triangles) to the display of circles eliminated effects of marihuana on accuracy of counting. Complex reaction times for oddity discrimination increased significantly only after the high dose. Nonetheless, both the social and high doses inappropriately inhibited the general tendency to respond to changing stimuli during oddity discrimination. Marihuana had no effect on field-dependence as measured by the Rod-and-frame test.


1974 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 1327-1331
Author(s):  
Richard A. Wunderlich

36 institutionalized children whose MA scores were at least 3 yr. below their CAs were divided into three matched groups of 12 subjects each and presented with a two-odd oddity discrimination. In two groups (S … R and Double-response), a 6-in. spatial gap was imposed between the oddity stimuli and the site response. Group Double-response differed from Group S … R only in requiring a double response, i.e., touching a chosen S before making R, In a third group (S + R), no spatial discontiguity between S and R existed; subjects responded directly to the oddity stimulus and not to the remote response block. In contrast to earlier studies there was little effect of discontiguity or of double responding on performance. Most subjects learned the oddity discrimination regardless of their experimental condition and in this regard were unlike retardates of other studies. Several possible explanations are offered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document