Optimal Dyadic Integration of Complementary Perceptual Judgments Under Condition of Prescribed Agreement

We investigated whether prescribing an agreement can result in optimal inter-individual integration of perceptual judgments in absence of verbal communication. Participants in pairs performed a localization task in a virtual 3D environment, where the goal was to make projections from an upper plane to the target on the bottom plane. Partners were provided with complementary viewpoints and could be optimal if each took over one orthogonal dimension. In the Revision condition partners saw each other’s individual judgments and could rely on them. In the Agreement condition they provided a joint response. In both conditions communication was not allowed. We found that participants could optimally distribute the dimensions, but only when agreement was mandated. Without the agreement requirement, participants failed to properly rely on their partner on the dimension where the latter were more accurate. We also found, that prescription of agreement exerts a general positive effect on individual performance.Our results demonstrate that even in absence of verbal communication, interacting in a shared environment can result in optimal integration of perceptual information under the condition that an agreement is reached.

ANALISIS PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM DALAM AKTA PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI (PPJB) TANAH ANTARA KOKO PURNOMO SANTOSO DENGAN PT. INTAN PLAZA ADIKA (Studi Kasus: Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 17/K/Pdt/2016)

Contract or agreement is an act pursuant to which one or more individuals commit themselves to one another. Based on the system that chapter III civil code used, chapter III civil code used opened system it means that every people can make an agreement with everybody and about anythings but the contract or agreement must be appropriate with terms of agreement and agreement principles. There are two kinds of agreement, first nominaat agreement, nominaat agreement is an agreement that already have a regulted in law. The second is innominaat agreement, innominaat agreement is an agreement that not regulated in law. condition sale and purchase agreement is innominaat agreement. Condition sale and purchase agreement was appeared because of freedom of contract. Eventhough condition sale and purchase agreement was made because freedom of contract but it must be appropriate with terms of agreement and agreement principles. If the agreement put aside the agreement principles and legal principles, the agreement can be null and void or can be canceled. In Koko Purnomo Santoso’s case, he already been punished for 4 years because, Koko sold lands that belongs to someone else and gave the wrong information in authentic deed. But, Intan Plaza Adika still want to continue the agreement because Intan Plaza Adika is a purchaser with good faith. The district court and high court agree with Intan Plaza Adika. But the supreme court said the opposite with district and high court, the supreme court said the agreement is null and void.

The impacts of customers’ observed severity and agreement on hotel booking intentions: moderating role of webcare and mediating role of trust in negative online reviews

Purpose The purpose of the paper is to examine the conditional role of webcare as a service failure recovery strategy on customers’ hotel booking intentions in presence of different levels of observed severity and review agreement. Furthermore, the study also examines the mechanism through which webcare can shape the adverse effect of observed severity and review agreement on hotel booking intentions. Design/methodology/approach A 2 (severity: high or low) × 2 (agreement: high or low) × 2 (webcare: webcare or no webcare) between-subject experimental design was conducted to collect responses. Analyses of variance and moderated mediation analysis were performed to analyze the study data. Findings Prospective customers who observed high severe service failure from a review reported less booking intention. Further, customers’ observed agreement strengthened these behaviors, i.e. customers who are exposed to high severe service failure in high-agreement condition reported low booking intention, as compared to those who exposed to low review agreement condition. Furthermore, results supported the fact that use of appropriate webcare plays a significant role to shape or mitigate the negative effect of severity and agreement on hotel booking intentions via perceived trust. Originality/value This is the first in its stream of studies that examined how webcare can be used to tackle the adverse effects of observed severity and agreement, so that perceived trust would be formed to create hotel booking intention.

Lexical Access Problems Lead to Disfluencies in Speech

A picture naming experiment in Dutch tested whether disfluencies in speech can arise from difficulties in lexical access. Speakers described networks consisting of line drawings and paths connecting these drawings, and we manipulated picture name agreement. Consistent with our hypothesis, there were more pauses and more self-corrections in the low name agreement condition than the high name agreement condition, but there was no effect on repetitions. We also considered determiner frequency. There were more self-corrections and more repetitions when the picture name required the less frequent (neuter-gender) determiner “het” than the more frequent (common-gender) determiner “de”. These data suggest that difficulties in distinct stages of language production result in distinct patterns of disfluencies.

A PROTOCOL FOR MAKING AN AGREEMENT IN A PEER-TO-PEER (P2P) SOCIETY

There are many discussions on agreement protocols of multiple peer processes (peers) where every peer just aims at agreeing on one value out of values shown by the peers. In meetings of human societies, agreement procedures are so flexible that persons can change their opinions and can use not only all-condition where every person agrees on one value but also various types of agreement conditions like majority-condition. In this paper, we discuss a flexible agreement protocol of multiple peers by taking into account human behaviors in social agreement procedures. Each peer first takes a value v1 and notifies the other peers of the value v1. A peer pi in turn receives values from other peers. Unless a set of the values from all the peers satisfy the agreement condition, the peer pi can take another value v2. In order to model the social human behavior, in our previous work we discussed E - and P -precedent relations [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] on values of a peer pi. The relations [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] show that a peer pi can take a value v2 after taking a value v1 and prefers v1 to v2, respectively. If a peer autonomously takes values based on its precedent relations, the peers might not make an agreement even if there exists a satisfiable set of previous values. We discuss what previous values the peer can take again. In this paper, we try to find a satisfiable set of previous values in a history of values which the peers have so far taken, in addition for each peer to taking a new value at each round.

Galvanic Skin Responses to Agreement and Disagreement in Relation to Dogmatism

48 female college students, selected to be relatively high or low on Rokeach's Dogmatism scale, listened to a series of tape-recorded statements asserting opinions that were either in strong agreement, strong disagreement, or mild disagreement with attitudes common in their group. Changes in galvanic skin responses were measured for each of 12 statements, 4 items representing each agreement condition. GSRs were greater for strong disagreement than strong agreement and for strong agreement than mild disagreement. Analysis of variance of the transformed GSR scores showed significant effects of level of dogmatism and extent of disagreement.