carotid shunt
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

24
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. e350
Author(s):  
Jamie Bousleiman ◽  
Massimo Napolitano ◽  
Simon Tran ◽  
Maha Hamdani ◽  
Christopher Faries ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. e151
Author(s):  
Jamie Bousleiman ◽  
Massimo Napolitano ◽  
Simon Tran ◽  
Maha Hamdani ◽  
Christopher M. Faries ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Murukendiran GJ ◽  
Rupa Sreedhar ◽  
Shrinivas V. Gadhinglajkar ◽  
Jagadish A ◽  
Saravana Babu ◽  
...  

Acta Medica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 25-31
Author(s):  
Süreyya Talay

Objectives: In this study, we described and compared a modified carotid endarterectomy surgical technique. Our comparison was between arteriotomy incision from common to interna and from common to externa. Methods: This study included 73 isolated carotid anrterctomy operations from two different centers. We performed external incision in 61 cases (Group A) and internal incision in 12 cases (Group B). We also elaborated perioperative data and surgical results between Groups. All cases were performed under general anaesthesia. Results: 2 patients in Group A and 2 patients in Group B died at the early postoperative period due to severe neurological deteriorations in 3 and myocardial infarction in 1 case. All cases were solely operated for carotid artery stenosis. None of these patients were presenting contrlaterally serious carotid artery lesions.  4 patients from Group A and 3 patients from Group B were receiving haemodialysis, perioperatively. Trancient minor neurological complications such as lingual deviation and/or facial asymmetry which were associated with N.Hypoglossus injuries, was observed in 8 cases and 2 cases in Group A and Group B, respectively. Patchplasty was necessary in 5 from Group A. No patchplasty was applied in Group B. We tried to avoid carotid shunt from common to interna in all standart procedures. However, carotid shunt was mandatory in 4 patients and in 1 patient from Group A and B. Conclusion: Our modified carotid incision from common to externa is almost always suitable for internal plaque removal. Thus, an incision to interna can be avoided which prevents internal artery narrowing, endothelial disruption and/or occlusion prone deterioration and internal artery intraoperative dissection risks. Therefore, we believe that an incision from common to external carotid artery is the first choice surgical approach for carotid endarterectomy.  


2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Josip Figl ◽  
Dražen Perkov

2015 ◽  
Vol 174 (6) ◽  
pp. 13-16
Author(s):  
I. V. Mikhailov ◽  
A. V. Gusinskiy ◽  
V. V. Shlomin ◽  
O. V. Orlova ◽  
T. B. Rakhmatillaev ◽  
...  

The study generalized the 15-year experience of classical carotid endarterectomy performance with application of a temporary carotid shunt and an autovenous path in 325 patients. There were analyzed the more frequent complications in standard groups. Advantages of given method were determined and it was specified the ways, which facilitated to reduction of intraoperative risks and increase of technical quality realization of different stages of surgery.


2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 594.e1-594.e4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianfranco Varetto ◽  
Claudio Castagno ◽  
Simone Quaglino ◽  
Paolo Garneri ◽  
Emilio Benintende ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 89-91
Author(s):  
Giulio Illuminati ◽  
Francesco G. Caliò ◽  
Giulia Pizzardi ◽  
Francesco Vietri

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document